Review · secondary evidenceFeature

Conjugated Coordination Polymers as Electrodes for Rechargeable Batteries

Chenyang Zhang, Kun Fan, Yuan Chen, Yanchao Wu, and Chengliang Wang · ACS Applied Electronic Materials · 2021

This dossier represents secondary evidence: section summaries, claims and benchmarks are paraphrased for this database, not quoted. Check quantitative values against the linked primary study, and cite the review itself (10.1021/acsaelm.1c00297) for its arguments.

10review sections
6material families
15review claims
14secondary benchmarks
20cited studies
8research gaps

Review scope

Highlight recent progress in conjugated coordination polymers as electrode materials for rechargeable batteries, with emphasis on chemical states, synthesis-structure relationships, molecular arrangement and charge-storage mechanisms.

Coverage
2012–2021
Category
Core Transport Physics
Material scope
Pi-d conjugated coordination polymers and conductive MOF-like frameworks · Square-planar M-X4 coordination units with N, O, S and Se ligating atoms · One-dimensional chains and two-dimensional layered CCPs used as battery electrodes
Transport scope
Electron delocalisation through pi-d conjugated skeletons · Effects of stacking, crystallinity, defects and chemical state on electronic conductivity · Ion diffusion and accommodation through ordered nanopores and interlayer spaces
Application scope
Lithium-ion, sodium-ion, potassium-ion and aqueous zinc batteries · Anode and cathode active materials using n-type and p-type redox processes · Charge-storage mechanism interpretation from ex situ spectroscopy and calculations
Explicit exclusions
Full primary synthesis recipes and exhaustive electrochemical datasets · Non-conductive MOFs except as contrast for traditional insulating MOFs · Applications outside rechargeable batteries except for brief context
Source
1947 · Abstract
Evidence role
Context, taxonomy and secondary benchmarking

Section map

The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.

Chemical Structures

1948-1949

Explains how planar ligands with NH, OH, SH or SeH groups coordinate transition metals, delocalise electrons and generate multiple possible redox/chemical states.

Relevance: Core · 1948 · 2.1. Chemical Structures · Figure 1

Conclusion and Outlook

1955-1956

Summarises CCP battery promise and identifies unresolved synthesis control, chemical-state identification, p-type mechanisms, metal-valence changes, complex compositions, exfoliation and scale-up.

Relevance: Core · 1955 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

CCPs as Electrode Active Materials for Batteries

1951-1955

Classifies battery mechanisms by ligating atom and distinguishes n-type cation storage, possible p-type anion storage, ligand redox and metal-centred redox contributions.

Relevance: Core · 1951 · 3. CCPs as Electrode Active Materials for Batteries

Introduction

1947-1948

Defines CCPs as pi-d conjugated frameworks that overcome the insulating character of many MOFs and frames their promise for rechargeable batteries.

Relevance: Core · 1947 · 1. Introduction

Molecular Arrangements

1950-1951

Connects one-dimensional and two-dimensional CCP packing motifs to charge and ion transport barriers, open channels and stability.

Relevance: Core · 1950 · 2.3. Molecular Arrangements · Figure 5

CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms

1952-1953

Reviews Ni-BTA, Ni-TABQ, Co-HAB, Ni-HAB and related nitrogen-ligated CCPs, emphasising relatively mature mechanistic understanding and remaining p-type uncertainty.

Relevance: Core · 1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 6

CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms

1953-1954

Reviews oxygen-ligated CCPs such as Cu-THQ and Cu3(HHTP)2, where higher ligand redox potentials and copper redox can support cathode operation but chemical-state mixtures complicate mechanism assignment.

Relevance: Core · 1953 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 8

Structural Features and Synthetic Principles

1948-1951

Organises CCP chemistry around ligand redox states, square-planar M-X4 units, ideal and nonideal chemical states, synthesis controls and molecular stacking.

Relevance: Core · 1948 · 2. Structural Features and Synthetic Principles · Figure 2

CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms

1954-1955

Reviews sulfur-ligated CCPs such as Ni-TTO/Ni-ETT and Cu-BHT, highlighting high conductivity, fast rates and mechanism uncertainty at low potentials.

Relevance: Core · 1955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 10

Synthesis

1948-1950

Presents synthesis as coupled coordination, deprotonation and oxidation, where reaction speed, base, oxidant, atmosphere and solvent determine crystallinity and chemical state.

Relevance: Core · 1949 · 2.2. Synthesis · Figure 4

Taxonomies

Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.

Framework Electronic Structure

CCPs as pi-d conjugated conductive MOF-like frameworks

The review distinguishes CCPs from most MOFs by extended pi-d conjugation between planar organic ligands and transition-metal nodes, leading to enhanced conductivity and stability.

Categories: Traditional insulating MOFs · Pi-d conjugated coordination polymers · Conductive MOFs

1947 · 1. Introduction

Electrochemical Carrier Type

n-type and p-type storage in CCPs

The review separates cation storage associated with reduced frameworks from possible anion storage associated with oxidised frameworks, while noting uncertainty about metal versus ligand electron origin.

Categories: n-type cation storage during reduction · p-type anion storage during oxidation · metal-centred redox contribution · ligand-centred redox contribution

1951 · 3. CCPs as Electrode Active Materials for Batteries

Molecular Arrangement

Dimensionality and stacking models

The review links the number of chelating groups and ligand geometry to 1D or 2D structures and then to packing motifs that influence charge and ion transport.

Categories: 1D staggered parallel packing · 1D herringbone packing · 2D eclipsed AA stacking · 2D slipped-parallel AB stacking · 2D staggered AB stacking

1950 · 2.3. Molecular Arrangements · Figure 5

Heteroatom Binding And Redox ChemistryAuthor-proposed

Ligating-atom families

The battery discussion is organised by ligating atom because the heteroatom affects chemical state, conductivity, electrode potential, stability and capacity.

Categories: Nitrogen-ligated CCPs · Oxygen-ligated CCPs · Sulfur-ligated CCPs · Selenium-ligated CCPs as structural possibility

1952 · 3. CCPs as Electrode Active Materials for Batteries

Coordination-Unit Redox And Charge StateAuthor-proposed

M-X4 chemical-state map

Figure 2 organises M-X4 units into possible resonant, reduced, oxidised and low-valent-metal states, which the review uses as a framework for interpreting synthesis and cycling.

Categories: State A electroneutral divalent metal semiquinone-like ligand · Reduced anionic ligand states · Oxidised p-type states · Low-valent metal states with counterions

1949 · 2.1. Chemical Structures · Figure 2

Material families

Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.

1D tetrasubstituted-benzene CCP chains

1D Chain Structures

One-dimensional CCPs from tetrasubstituted benzenes, ethenes or biphenyls that can adopt staggered parallel or herringbone packing.

Conduction: Packing is compared with conjugated organic semiconductors, implying through-framework and intermolecular transport relevance.

Representative materials: 1D Ni-BTA · M(dhbq)-type chains

Nodes / linkers: Ni · Mn · Co · Zn · tetrasubstituted benzene · dihydroxybenzoquinone

1950 · 2.3. Molecular Arrangements · Figure 5a,b

Cu-BHT copper bis(dithiol) framework

2D Copper Bis(Dithiol) Framework

A sulfur-rich 2D copper bis(dithiol) framework where each Cu coordinates four sulfur atoms and each sulfur connects to two Cu ions, differing from the usual M-X4 unit description.

Conduction: Reported by the review as highly conductive, with high Li-ion diffusion coefficient and strong rate/cycling behaviour.

Representative materials: Cu-BHT · [Cu3(C6S6)]n

Nodes / linkers: Cu · benzenehexathiolate

1955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms

M3(HITP)2 triphenylene conductive MOFs

2D Layered Frameworks

Hexaiminotriphenylene-based 2D conductive MOFs used in the review as examples of weak-base and solvent control over crystallinity.

Conduction: The review treats improved crystallinity and controlled deprotonation as relevant to conductivity and performance.

Representative materials: Ni3(HITP)2 · Cu3(HITP)2 · Co3(HITP)2

Nodes / linkers: Ni · Cu · Co · hexaiminotriphenylene

1950 · 2.2. Synthesis

Nitrogen-ligated M-(NH)4 CCPs

1D Chains And 2D Layered Frameworks

CCPs built from amine or imine ligands that form M-(NH)4-like coordination units after deprotonation and ligand oxidation.

Conduction: Precise state-A-like coordination is associated by the review with relatively high conductivity and electrochemical performance; mixed states can also produce conductivity but complicate mechanism assignment.

Representative materials: Ni-BTA · Ni-TABQ · Co-HAB · Ni-HAB · Co_xNi_1-x-HAB

Nodes / linkers: Ni · Co · 1,2,4,5-benzenetetramine · tetraminobenzoquinone · hexaaminobenzene

1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figures 6-7

Oxygen-ligated quinone/catecholate CCPs

Mostly 2D Layered Or Nonplanar Coordination Frameworks

CCPs using oxygen-rich quinone, catecholate or hydroxyquinone ligands, often with Cu centres and sometimes additional solvent coordination.

Conduction: Oxygen-ligated CCPs are discussed as higher-potential redox frameworks where ligand and metal valence changes can both contribute to capacity.

Representative materials: Cu-THQ · Cu3(HHTP)2 · Cu-HHB · [CuL(DMF)2]n · (H2NMe2)2Fe2(Cl2dhbq)3-type frameworks

Nodes / linkers: Cu · Fe · tetrahydroxyquinone · hexahydroxytriphenylene · hexahydroxybenzene · dihydroxybenzoquinone

1953 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms · Figures 8-9

Sulfur-ligated tetrathiooxalate and tetrathiolate CCPs

Primarily Polymeric Coordination Frameworks

CCPs with sulfur ligating atoms, including Ni-TTO/Ni-ETT-type polymers, where sulfur promotes strong electron delocalisation.

Conduction: The review attributes superior conductivity to sulfur's large size and low electronegativity, which favour electron delocalisation and faster reaction.

Representative materials: Ni-TTO · Ni-ETT · poly(nickel-ethylenetetrathiolate)

Nodes / linkers: Ni · tetrathiooxalate · ethenetetrathiolate

1955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 10

Synthesis strategies

Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.

Atmosphere and oxidant control

Air, inert atmosphere or vacuum determine whether metal ions and ligands remain in State A-like forms or shift toward reduced low-valence states.

Claimed effects: Cu-THQ prepared under inert atmosphere was dominated by State D, whereas air oxidation favoured dominant State A.

Controlling variables: Air exposure · Inert gas shielding · Vacuum · Presence or absence of oxygen

Representative materials: Cu-THQ · Cu-HHB

Caveat: Air-sensitive low-valent states complicate ex situ characterisation.

1950 · 2.2. Synthesis

Base and additive selection

Changing the base from ammonia to ethylenediamine or weak acetate-type bases is used to retard nucleation, suppress side coordination and improve crystallinity.

Claimed effects: Ethylenediamine enabled highly crystalline Cu-HHB, while weaker bases improved crystallinity in HITP frameworks.

Controlling variables: Base strength · Competing coordination · Additives · Metal-ion solubility

Representative materials: Cu-HHB · Ni3(HITP)2 · Cu3(HITP)2 · Co3(HITP)2

Caveat: Base effects are entangled with coordination chemistry and solvent effects.

1950 · 2.2. Synthesis

Coupled coordination, deprotonation and oxidation

The review interprets CCP formation as an in situ sequence of metal-ligand coordination, base-driven deprotonation and oxidant-driven partial ligand oxidation.

Claimed effects: Correct balancing of the three processes is needed to obtain ideal structures and avoid mixed valence, uncoordinated sites and uncertain ligand oxidation states.

Controlling variables: Metal precursor · Base · Oxidant · Order and rate of coordination/deprotonation/oxidation

Representative materials: Generic M-X4 CCPs

Caveat: The exact sequence in fast in situ reactions is stated as unrevealed.

1948 · 2.2. Synthesis · Figure 3

Hydrothermal, solvothermal and interfacial synthesis

The review lists hydro/solvothermal routes and gas-liquid, liquid-liquid and solid-liquid interfacial methods as common CCP formation strategies.

Claimed effects: These routes provide the practical synthesis landscape for CCPs, but the review stresses that product chemistry remains sensitive to reaction conditions.

Controlling variables: Solvent · Interface type · Concentration · Pressure · Atmosphere

Representative materials: Plentiful CCPs · Cu-THQ · Cu-BHT

Caveat: The review does not provide a universal route to ideal chemical states.

1948 · 2.2. Synthesis

Slow reaction and solvent-diffusion growth

Slowing reaction speed, nucleation and crystal growth by solvent diffusion or controlled feeding is presented as a way to improve crystallinity and state control.

Claimed effects: For Ni-BTA, slow solvent diffusion gave the highest crystallinity and chemical states closest to the ideal State A.

Controlling variables: Reaction speed · Nucleation rate · Crystal growth rate · Feeding manner · Reaction time

Representative materials: Ni-BTA

Caveat: The strategy is illustrated with selected materials and is not a universal recipe.

1949 · 2.2. Synthesis · Figure 4

Coordinating solvent modulation

Coordinating solvents and water mixtures are described as tools for modulating deprotonation, nucleation and growth, especially in HITP frameworks.

Claimed effects: Weak bases and organic cosolvents decelerate nucleation and growth, improving crystallinity.

Controlling variables: DMF · DMSO · DMA · Water mixtures · Organic cosolvent fraction

Representative materials: M3(HITP)2

Caveat: For oxygen-ligated CCPs, solvent can also enter coordination structures and change mechanistic interpretation.

1950 · 2.2. Synthesis

Review claims

These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.

Author InterpretationMedium supportTransport Mechanism

For 2D CCPs, interlayer spaces and nanopores are argued to facilitate ion diffusion and accommodation, enhancing rate performance and cyclability.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The review frames this as an opportunity; primary measurements are still needed for material-specific diffusion coefficients.

1951 · 2.3. Molecular Arrangements

Consensus SummaryMedium supportTransport Mechanism

Ordered molecular arrangements are interpreted as reducing transport barriers for charges and ions in CCPs.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review mainly provides structural analogy and selected literature examples rather than a single quantitative transport model.

1950 · 2.3. Molecular Arrangements · Figure 5

Author InterpretationMedium supportApplication Relevance

The review argues that high electrical conductivity, ordered nanopores, electrolyte-insoluble frameworks and flexible organic segments make CCPs promising rechargeable-battery electrodes.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The authors also state that battery applications remain in their infancy.

1947 · 1. Introduction

Consensus SummaryHigh supportDefinition Scope

CCPs are presented as conductive MOF-like frameworks that address the intrinsically insulating behaviour of many traditional MOFs through extended pi-d conjugation.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review notes that some reports use the term conductive MOFs for these materials.

1947 · 1. Introduction

ContestedHigh supportControversy

Precise CCP chemical states remain controversial, including counterions, radicals, metal valence and bond-order assignments.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: Difficulty arises partly from scarce large high-quality single crystals and dependence on characterisation purity and method.

1948 · 2.1. Chemical Structures · Figure 2

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

Despite rapid growth, CCPs for rechargeable batteries are still at an early stage with unresolved synthesis, state identification, mechanism and scale-up challenges.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The conclusion is an outlook statement rather than a measured result.

1955 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

SpeculativeMedium supportCaveat

Very low-potential discharge of sulfur-ligated materials can give high capacities but poor cyclability, possibly due to Ni-S bond breakage.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review states that different mechanisms need further investigation.

1955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms

Consensus SummaryHigh supportMaterial Comparison

Nitrogen-ligated CCPs are described as the most widely studied and mechanistically understood family, with Ni-BTA used to demonstrate two-electron Na storage and ligand-centred redox.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: Low-valent Ni can be difficult to verify ex situ because of air oxidation during handling.

1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 6

Consensus SummaryMedium supportMaterial Comparison

Oxygen-ligated CCPs are interpreted as higher-potential redox systems than nitrogen-ligated analogues and therefore as cathode candidates.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: Mixed Cu states and solvent participation complicate mechanism assignment.

1953 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 8

ContestedMedium supportControversy

P-type oxidation and anion insertion in nitrogen-ligated CCPs are promising for high-voltage operation, but the electron source and mechanism remain unresolved.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review states that stronger evidence is needed and some cells showed poor cyclability.

1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 7

Author InterpretationMedium supportStructure Property Link

Slow growth is presented as beneficial for precise coordination, deprotonation and oxidation, improving crystallinity and electrochemical properties in Ni-BTA.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: This is shown as an example rather than as a universally proven rule.

1949 · 2.2. Synthesis · Figure 4

Author InterpretationMedium supportStructure Property Link

The authors propose State A as the ideal CCP coordination-unit state: electroneutral, divalent metal ions, partially oxidised deprotonated ligands and delocalised pi-d conjugation.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The wording is explicitly probabilistic and the review acknowledges other states can form during synthesis.

1948 · 2.1. Chemical Structures · Figure 2

Author InterpretationMedium supportTransport Mechanism

Sulfur-ligated CCPs usually show superior conductivity because sulfur's size and low electronegativity increase electron delocalisation.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The same chemistry may also produce faster reactions and more reduced states, increasing state-control challenges.

1955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 10

Consensus SummaryHigh supportSynthesis Strategy

Growth control is central because small variations in base, oxidant, solvent, atmosphere and reaction speed can shift crystallinity, defects and chemical states.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review does not establish a universal parameter window for all CCP families.

1949 · 2.2. Synthesis · Figure 4

Author InterpretationMedium supportMeasurement Interpretation

The review stresses that voltage-window choice can determine whether CCP redox is reversible and cyclable, especially where metal reduction to low or zero valence may occur.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: Some high-capacity lithium-anode reports are flagged as poor-cycling and needing further investigation.

1954 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms

Secondary benchmarks

Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.

MaterialPropertyReported valueContext and qualityPrimary evidenceReview source
SecondaryCu-BHTReversible capacity175 mAh g-1 in 1.5-3.0 VLithium storage cathode; voltage window 1.5-3.0 V
Text · Exact Reported
research_03651955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms
SecondaryCu-BHTElectrical conductivity231 S cm-12D copper bis(dithiol) framework used as lithium-storage cathode
Text · Exact Reported
research_03651955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms
SecondaryCu-BHTSpecific capacity at low loading/current232 mAh g-1 at 50 mA g-1Low mass loading and low current density
Text · Exact Reported
research_03651955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms
SecondaryCu3(HHTP)2Initial capacity228 mAh g-1Cathode for rechargeable aqueous zinc batteries
Text · Exact Reported
research_01881954 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 9a
SecondaryCu-THQCapacity decay in broad voltage window400 to 144 mAh g-1 after 20 cyclesAir-synthesised Cu-THQ; 1.3-4.0 V vs Li/Li+ at 0.1 A g-1
Text · Range
research_00431954 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 8c
SecondaryCu-THQSpecific capacity after long cycling99 mAh g-1 after 1000 cycles at 1 A g-1Lower charge cutoff at 2.6 V; 1 A g-1
Text · Exact Reported
research_00431954 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 8f
SecondaryCu-THQSpecific capacity in narrowed voltage window300 mAh g-11.3-3.3 V at 0.1 A g-1
Text · Exact Reported
research_00431954 · 3.2. CCPs with Oxygen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 8d
SecondaryNi-BTALigand-centred sodium-storage redox potentialapproximately 1.0 V vs Na/Na+Sodium-ion battery discharge; quinoid imine to benzoid amine transformation
Text · Approximate
No verified corpus mapping1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 6a
SecondaryNi-BTANi2+/Ni+ reduction potentialapproximately 0.75 V vs Na/Na+Sodium-ion discharge with Ni reduced from divalent to monovalent state
Text · Approximate
No verified corpus mapping1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 6a
SecondaryNi-HABSpecific capacityapproximately 155 mAh g-1 at 10 mA g-1Lithium-ion cathode window 2.0-4.5 V
Text · Approximate
No verified corpus mapping1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 7c
SecondaryNi-TABQSpecific capacity454.2 mAh g-1 at 0.2 A g-1Sodium-ion storage; reported by the review for Ni-TABQ at 0.2 A g-1
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 6f,g
SecondaryNi-TABQSpecific capacity after cycling400.0 mAh g-1 at 1.0 A g-1 after 100 cyclesAfter 100 cycles at 1.0 A g-1
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping1952 · 3.1. CCPs with Nitrogen as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 6g
SecondaryNi-TTOHigh-rate initial capacity and retention155 mAh g-1 and 84% retention at 5 A g-1Sodium-ion cathode; 5 A g-1, 10 mA cm-2, 30C, 80% active material
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping1955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 10b,c
SecondaryNi-TTO / Ni-ETTElectrical conductivityas high as 30 S cm-1Sulfur-ligated CCPs based on ETT and Ni salt; structural assignment controversial
Text · Approximate
No verified corpus mapping1955 · 3.1.3. CCPs with Sulfur as the Ligating Atoms · Figure 10

Research gaps

Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.

Chemical-state assignment

High

Blurred or mixed chemical states create inconsistencies between theoretical expectations and experimentally observed properties.

Proposed direction: Combine better-controlled samples with more reliable structural and spectroscopic characterisation.

1955 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

Compositional complexity

Medium

More complex CCPs with multimetal centres, different ligands or different ligating atoms remain underdeveloped for battery performance.

Proposed direction: Explore multimetal, mixed-ligand and mixed-heteroatom frameworks with controlled state distributions.

1956 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

Synthesis and chemical-state control

High

Growth control of CCPs with ideal or desired chemical states and structures remains challenging.

Proposed direction: Develop synthesis routes that control coordination, deprotonation, oxidation, crystallinity and defect formation.

1955 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

Single-crystal structure determination

Medium

High-quality, large CCP single crystals suitable for single-crystal XRD are difficult to obtain, limiting chemical-state understanding.

Proposed direction: Improve crystal-growth control and use characterisation methods that avoid unreliable conclusions.

1948 · 2.1. Chemical Structures

Metal redox and low-valent states

Medium

The reduction of metal ions to low valences remains vague, while oxidation of Cu+ has been corroborated but still underperforms theoretical capacity.

Proposed direction: Design operando or air-protected characterisation to separate ligand and metal redox contributions.

1956 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

P-type storage mechanism

High

More evidence is required to support ligand oxidation and anion-intercalation mechanisms and to improve high-voltage performance.

Proposed direction: Directly verify p-type charge storage and optimise materials for high voltage, capacity and energy density.

1956 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

Post-treatment and nanosheets

Medium

Post-treatment routes such as exfoliation into nanosheets have not been sufficiently considered for utilising CCP merits.

Proposed direction: Develop exfoliation and nanosheet processing strategies that preserve conductivity and active sites.

1956 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

Application and scale-up

Medium

Low-cost and scalable mass production is required before CCPs can become practical battery materials.

Proposed direction: Prioritise scalable synthesis and processing routes alongside mechanistic studies.

1956 · 4. Conclusion and Outlook

Cited-study map

Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.

Show 20 cited-study records
ReferenceStudyRole and contextCorpus mapping
Ref. 32020Electrically Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworksdefinition_scope · transport_contextCited as background for conductive MOFs and for distinguishing CCPs from insulating MOFs.Unmapped
Ref. 72020The Chemical States of Conjugated Coordination Polymers10.1016/j.chempr.2020.12.007chemical_state_framework · structure_property_contextCentral cited framework for State A/B/C/D chemical-state interpretation and Figure 2 adaptation.Unmapped
Ref. 92012New Porous Crystals of Extended Metal-Catecholateshistorical_framing · material_familyCited as part of the early 2012 emergence of CCPs/conductive MOF-like frameworks.Unmapped
Ref. 172019A One-Dimensional pi-d Conjugated Coordination Polymer for Sodium Storage with Catalytic Activity in Negishi Couplingbattery_mechanism · synthesis_control · benchmark_contextUsed for Ni-BTA slow-growth synthesis, State A control, Na-storage mechanism and Ni reduction caveat.Unmapped
Ref. 182018Robust and Conductive Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks with Exceptionally High Volumetric and Areal Capacitanceformation_process · structure_contextCited for formation-process schematic and as an example of 2D CCP stacking/structure.Unmapped
Ref. 192018Synthetic Routes for a 2D Semiconductive Copper Hexahydroxybenzene Metal-Organic Frameworksynthesis_control · material_familyUsed for base/ethylenediamine effects and atmosphere sensitivity in Cu-HHB-type oxygen-ligated CCPs.research_0792
Ref. 202020A Redox-Active 2D Metal-Organic Framework for Efficient Lithium Storage with Extraordinary High Capacitybattery_mechanism · oxygen_ligatedUsed for inert-atmosphere Cu-THQ, State D dominance, two redox pairs and Cu1+/Cu2+ assignment.Unmapped
Ref. 212019A Highly Conductive Conjugated Coordination Polymer for Fast-Charge Sodium-Ion Batteries: Reconsidering Its Structurestransport_benchmark · battery_benchmark · chemical_stateUsed for sulfur-ligated high conductivity, Ni-TTO/Ni-ETT structural controversy and fast-charge sodium-ion battery performance.Unmapped
Ref. 292021Atomically Precise Single-Crystal Structures of Electrically Conducting 2D Metal-Organic Frameworksstructural_characterisation · chemical_state_contextCited for the rarity and value of high-quality single-crystal structural information.Unmapped
Ref. 302019Single Crystals of Electrically Conductive Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks: Structural and Electrical Transport Propertiesstructural_characterisation · transport_propertiesCited as evidence for single-crystal structural and electrical transport characterisation relevance.research_0005
Ref. 312020Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2 (M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloyssynthesis_control · transport_contextUsed for weak-base and coordinating-solvent effects on crystallinity and for conductivity-tuning context.research_0041
Ref. 352018Stabilization of Hexaaminobenzene in a 2D Conductive Metal-Organic Framework for High Power Sodium Storagebattery_mechanism · nitrogen_ligatedUsed for Co-HAB sodium-storage mechanism and the question of Co low-valence contribution.research_0004
Ref. 372020Ultrathin Two-Dimensional Conjugated Metal-Organic Framework Single-Crystalline Nanosheets Enabled by Surfactant-Assisted Synthesisoxygen_ligated · voltage_window · benchmark_contextUsed for air-synthesised Cu-THQ State A dominance, voltage-window tuning and cycling benchmarks.research_0043
Ref. 512018Multielectron-Transfer-Based Rechargeable Energy Storage of Two-Dimensional Coordination Frameworks with Non-Innocent Ligandsp_type_storage · benchmark_contextUsed for p-type/anion-insertion discussion and Ni-HAB capacity benchmark.Unmapped
Ref. 532020A Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Polymer Enabled by Robust Nickel-Nitrogen and Hydrogen Bonds for Exceptional Sodium-Ion Storagebattery_benchmark · nitrogen_ligatedUsed for high-capacity Ni-TABQ sodium-ion storage and four-electron-transfer interpretation.Unmapped
Ref. 672019Conductive 2D Metal-Organic Framework for High-Performance Cathodes in Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc Batteriesoxygen_ligated · battery_benchmarkUsed for aqueous zinc battery Cu3(HHTP)2 mechanism and initial capacity benchmark.research_0188
Ref. 682019Elucidating Metal and Ligand Redox Activities of a Copper-Benzoquinoid Coordination Polymer as the Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteriesoxygen_ligated · redox_mechanismUsed for solvent-coordinated oxygen-ligated CCPs and ligand/metal redox activity in lithium half-cells.Unmapped
Ref. 752020Highly Conductive Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks for Resilient Lithium Storage with Superb Rate Capabilitytransport_benchmark · battery_benchmark · sulfur_ligatedUsed for Cu-BHT high conductivity, rate/cycling performance and contested storage-mechanism interpretation.research_0365
Ref. 592019Nanostructured Metal-Organic Conjugated Coordination Polymers with Ligand Tailoring for Superior Rechargeable Energy Storageligand_tailoring · battery_mechanism · caveatUsed for reports of high initial but poor-cycling LIB behaviour and contrasting stable mixed N/S ligating-atom materials.Unmapped
Ref. 612020Tailoring the Electrochemical Properties of Two-Dimensional Bis(diimino)metal Coordination Frameworks by Introducing Co/Ni Heterometallic Structuresp_type_storage · heterometallic_frameworkUsed for heterometallic Co/Ni-HAB p-type redox activity and open question about electron origin.Unmapped