Review · secondary evidenceFeature

Tailored porous framework materials for advancing lithium-sulfur batteries

Bingqian Liu and V. Sara Thoi · Chemical Communications · 2022

This dossier represents secondary evidence: section summaries, claims and benchmarks are paraphrased for this database, not quoted. Check quantitative values against the linked primary study, and cite the review itself (10.1039/d1cc07087h) for its arguments.

8review sections
6material families
14review claims
12secondary benchmarks
18cited studies
5research gaps

Review scope

Describe MOF design strategies for lithium-sulfur cathodes, especially tuning polysulfide affinity, ionic conductivity, porosity, redox activity, electrode density and low-temperature behaviour.

Coverage
2009–2021
Category
Core Transport Physics
Material scope
Metal-organic frameworks as sulfur hosts and cathode additives · Zr-based MOFs including UiO-66, MOF-808 and NU-1000 · CuBTC, lithium-thiophosphate-functionalised MOFs, anthraquinone-functionalised MOFs and MOF/graphene composite cathodes
Transport scope
Polysulfide shuttle suppression and host-guest interactions · Ion diffusion through MOF pores and lithiated defect sites · Charge transfer through redox-active linkers, porosity tuning and conductive electrode composites
Application scope
Lithium-sulfur batteries · MOF-based sulfur cathodes and cathode additives · High-density and low-temperature Li-S operation
Explicit exclusions
Full primary synthesis recipes · Exhaustive Li-S battery literature outside MOF and porous-framework hosts · Primary-data treatment of the cited electrochemical values
Source
4005 · Abstract
Evidence role
Context, taxonomy and secondary benchmarking

Section map

The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.

Promoting charge transport in MOFs

4009-4012

Reviews node lithiation, redox-active anthraquinone incorporation and porosity tuning as ways to improve ion conductivity, charge transfer and rate capability.

Relevance: Core · 4009 · 2.2. Promoting charge transport in MOFs

Conclusions

4014

Summarises the framework design rules and highlights unresolved needs: denser polysulfide anchors, mapped ion pathways, improved electronic conductivity and balanced electrode energy density.

Relevance: Core · 4014 · 4. Conclusions

Design strategies for constructing better sulfur cathodes

4006-4012

Organises the review around increasing polysulfide affinity, ionic conductivity and charge-transport efficiency through MOF tunability.

Relevance: Core · 4006 · 2. Design strategies for constructing better sulfur cathodes · Scheme 1

Introduction

4005

Frames Li-S batteries as high-energy but cyclability-limited systems where soluble polysulfides create active-material loss, passivation and impedance; introduces MOFs as tunable porous sulfur hosts.

Relevance: Core · 4005 · 1. Introduction

Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites for polysulfide binding

4006-4007

Uses CuBTC to show how unsaturated Lewis acidic Cu sites bind sulfur species and how particle size changes surface-site density, polysulfide retention and performance.

Relevance: Core · 4006 · 2.1.1. Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites for polysulfide binding · Fig. 1

Promoting interactions between MOFs and lithium polysulfides

4006-4009

Reviews physical encapsulation and chemical binding approaches, including open Cu sites, organic linker tethering and node-bound lithium thiophosphate groups.

Relevance: Core · 4006 · 2.1. Promoting interactions between MOFs and lithium polysulfides

Polysulfide tethering groups

4007-4009

Separates covalent organic-linker tethering from post-synthetic node functionalisation, using maleimide-UiO-66 and lithium thiophosphate on Zr-MOF nodes as examples.

Relevance: Core · 4007 · 2.1.2. Polysulfide tethering groups · Figs. 2-4

Towards practical implementation of MOF-based Li-S batteries

4012-4014

Extends the materials design discussion to high-density graphene/ethyl-cellulose composite electrodes and LPS-functionalised additives for low-temperature operation.

Relevance: Core · 4012 · 3. Towards practical implementation of MOF-based Li-S batteries · Figs. 8-9

Taxonomies

Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.

Location And Chemical Nature Of Polysulfide BindingAuthor-proposed

MOF-polysulfide interaction routes

The review distinguishes pore confinement from chemical binding at Lewis acidic metal sites, organic linkers and Zr-MOF nodes.

Categories: Physical encapsulation in pores · Open metal sites · Organic linker tethering groups · Post-synthetic node functionalisation

4007 · 2.1.2. Polysulfide tethering groups

Device-Level Limitation For MOF-Based Li-S BatteriesAuthor-proposed

Practical implementation barriers

The implementation section separates electrode packing/contact problems from low-temperature transport and clustering problems.

Categories: Low electronic conductivity · Low electrode density · Low-temperature ion diffusion and polysulfide clustering · Sulfur loading and electrode porosity trade-off

4012 · 3.1. High-density cathode through materials engineering

Functional Role In Li-S Cathode PerformanceAuthor-proposed

Three design axes for porous Li-S cathode frameworks

Scheme 1 visually organises the review into chemical anchoring, transport enhancement and implementation-level electrode design.

Categories: Promote MOF-polysulfide interactions · Enhance charge transport · Achieve practical implementation

4006 · 2. Design strategies for constructing better sulfur cathodes · Scheme 1

Dominant Transport Bottleneck AddressedAuthor-proposed

Charge-transport enhancement strategies

Section 2.2 presents transport as coupled ionic and electronic limitations that can be altered by lithiation, redox chemistry and pore architecture.

Categories: Node lithiation for Li-ion pathways · Redox-active linkers for electron and ion mediation · Porosity tuning to balance ion flux and redox-site loading

4012 · 2.2.3. Porosity tuning

Material families

Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.

Anthraquinone-functionalised Zr-MOFs

Three-Dimensional Redox-Active Zr-MOFs

Zr-MOFs incorporating redox-active anthraquinone either as a linker or as a post-synthetically grafted open-site component.

Conduction: AQ provides redox-active sites for electron storage/mobilisation and Li-ion interaction, while loading must be balanced against pore blockage.

Representative materials: 2,6-Zr-AQ-MOF · Li-2,6-Zr-AQ-MOF · NU-1000-AQ · MOF-808-AQ

Nodes / linkers: Zr oxide clusters · 2,6-dicarboxy-9,10-anthraquinone · Anthraquinone-2-carboxylate

4010 · 2.2.2. Redox activity incorporation · Fig. 6

CuBTC with coordinatively unsaturated copper sites

Three-Dimensional MOF

Copper paddlewheel MOF whose axial aqua ligands can be removed to expose Lewis acidic Cu sites for sulfur/polysulfide binding.

Conduction: Charge transport is influenced by surface-site density and particle morphology; smaller particles provide more undercoordinated Cu sites for polysulfide retention.

Representative materials: CuBTC · CuBTC@S

Nodes / linkers: Copper paddlewheel · Benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate

4006 · 2.1.1. Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites · Fig. 1

Lithium-thiophosphate-functionalised Zr-MOFs

Three-Dimensional Zr-MOFs With Node-Bound Inorganic Groups

Zr-MOFs bearing PS4-based lithium thiophosphate groups at Zr nodes or defect sites to tether polysulfides and promote Li-S cycling.

Conduction: Lithium thiophosphate is framed as both a polysulfide tether and an ion-conducting motif that can lower overpotential and alter low-temperature polysulfide speciation.

Representative materials: LPS-UiO-66 · LPS-MOF-808 · MOF-808-LPS

Nodes / linkers: Zr6 clusters · UiO-66 linkers · MOF-808 linkers · Node-bound thiophosphate

4008 · 2.1.2.2 Open metal site functionalization · Fig. 3

Maleimide-functionalised UiO-66

Three-Dimensional Zr-MOF

UiO-66 derivative with maleimide groups on BDC linkers for covalent reaction with sulfide/polysulfide species.

Conduction: Maleimide tethering reduces polysulfide dissolution and may reduce cell polarisation by improving sulfur redox kinetics.

Representative materials: Mi-UiO-66 · NH2-UiO-66 control

Nodes / linkers: Zr6 clusters · Maleimide-functionalised BDC · Amino-functionalised BDC

4007 · 2.1.2.1. Organic linker functionalization · Fig. 2

MOF/graphene-ethyl cellulose composite cathodes

Composite Porous Electrode Architecture

High-density sulfur-loaded MOF cathode composites where graphene/ethyl cellulose replaces conventional carbon black and binder mixtures.

Conduction: Improved interfacial contact and more compact coatings are used to address low MOF conductivity and low electrode density.

Representative materials: MOF-808@S/GEC · LPS-MOF-808@S/GEC · MOF-808+S/SP

Nodes / linkers: Zr6 clusters · MOF-808 linkers · Graphene/ethyl cellulose conductive composite

4012 · 3.1. High-density cathode through materials engineering · Fig. 8

Zr-based UiO-66 and MOF-808 hosts

Three-Dimensional Zr-MOFs

Robust Zr-oxo cluster frameworks used as platforms for defect engineering, node functionalisation, lithiation and sulfur hosting.

Conduction: Native frameworks are stable and porous but typically electronically insulating; defects and open sites enable Li-ion incorporation and functional-group attachment.

Representative materials: UiO-66 · MOF-808 · NU-1000

Nodes / linkers: Hexanuclear Zr-oxo clusters · Dicarboxylate linkers · Multicarboxylate linkers · Carboxylate modulators

4005 · 1. Introduction

Synthesis strategies

Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.

Engineer dense conductive MOF composite electrodes

Combine sulfur-loaded MOF particles with graphene/ethyl cellulose to improve interfacial contact and electrode compactness.

Claimed effects: Improves gravimetric and volumetric capacity by addressing low electronic conductivity and low density of MOF-incorporated cathodes.

Controlling variables: Sulfur loading · Conductive additive identity · Slurry morphology · Electrode coating density · Interfacial contact

Representative materials: MOF-808@S/GEC · LPS-MOF-808@S/GEC

Caveat: Implementation benefit depends on electrode architecture, not just intrinsic framework chemistry.

4013 · 3.1. High-density cathode through materials engineering · Fig. 8

Install covalent polysulfide-tethering linkers

Use organic linker functionality, illustrated by maleimide groups, to chemically capture sulfide/polysulfide species within a MOF host.

Claimed effects: Forms C-S bonds with polysulfide species, avoids dissolution and improves cycling and rate performance relative to non-tethering controls.

Controlling variables: Linker functional group · Polysulfide reactivity · Framework stability · Cathode additive choice

Representative materials: Mi-UiO-66 · NH2-UiO-66

Caveat: The review frames this as a targeted chemical strategy rather than a universal solution for all polysulfide chemistries.

4007 · 2.1.2.1. Organic linker functionalization · Fig. 2

Lithiate defect sites in Zr-MOF nodes

Introduce missing-linker defects and replace labile protons at defect sites with Li ions to raise local lithium concentration.

Claimed effects: Enhances Li-ion conductivity, reduces resistance and improves rate performance when the MOF structure remains intact.

Controlling variables: Defect modulator · HCl activation · Lithiation base · Temperature · Framework crystallinity

Representative materials: Li-UiO-66(50Benz) · UiO-66(50Benz)

Caveat: Harsher lithiation conditions can increase Li content but diminish framework integrity and crystallinity, reducing benefit.

4009 · 2.2.1. Node lithiation · Fig. 5

Post-synthetically graft lithium thiophosphate to Zr-MOF nodes

Replace node-bound ligands or use defect/open sites to bind PS4-based lithium thiophosphate groups inside Zr-MOFs.

Claimed effects: Tethers polysulfides, lowers electrochemical overpotentials, improves sulfur utilisation and can disrupt low-temperature polysulfide clustering.

Controlling variables: Number of open Zr sites · Defect density · LPS loading · Parent MOF porosity

Representative materials: LPS-UiO-66 · LPS-MOF-808 · MOF-808-LPS

Caveat: The review notes that internal porosity is necessary; LPS-ZrO2 controls failed within 100 cycles.

4008 · 2.1.2.2 Open metal site functionalization · Figs. 3-4

Expose coordinatively unsaturated metal sites

Remove ligands or exploit undercoordinated surface sites to create Lewis acidic metal centres that bind sulfur species.

Claimed effects: Increases polysulfide retention and improves capacity retention by providing chemically active host sites.

Controlling variables: Thermal activation · Particle size · Surface morphology · S:MOF ratio

Representative materials: CuBTC · CuBTC@S

Caveat: The review's evidence is mainly from one CuBTC case; smaller particle size improves surface-site density but may not generalise to all MOFs.

4006 · 2.1.1. Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites · Fig. 1

Incorporate anthraquinone redox activity

Use AQ linkers or grafted AQ species to add reversible redox sites that store and mobilise electrons and lithium ions during Li-S cycling.

Claimed effects: Improves redox electrokinetics, charge-transfer resistance and sulfur utilisation, especially at high C-rates when ion flux is limiting.

Controlling variables: AQ linker identity · AQ loading · Lithiation state · C-rate · Pore accessibility

Representative materials: 2,6-Zr-AQ-MOF · Li-2,6-Zr-AQ-MOF · NU-1000-AQ · MOF-808-AQ

Caveat: Excess AQ loading blocks pores; the review stresses balancing redox-site density and free pore volume.

4011 · 2.2.3. Porosity tuning · Fig. 7

Review claims

These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.

Author InterpretationHigh supportTransport Mechanism

Anthraquinone units in Zr-MOFs are interpreted as redox-active components that facilitate sulfur redox electrokinetics and improve high-rate performance.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: Low-rate benefits are less pronounced in some lithiated AQ systems; rate regime matters.

4010 · 2.2.2. Redox activity incorporation · Fig. 6

Author InterpretationHigh supportApplication Relevance

Practical MOF-based Li-S electrodes require materials engineering to overcome low electronic conductivity and low density, not only molecular-level polysulfide anchoring.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: Composite electrode benefits depend on slurry morphology and conductive substrate choice.

4012 · 3.1. High-density cathode through materials engineering · Fig. 8

Author InterpretationHigh supportTransport Mechanism

Node lithiation can improve Li-ion transport and rate capability, but higher lithium content alone is insufficient if harsh lithiation damages framework integrity.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The beneficial balance depends on defect chemistry and preservation of the UiO-66 framework.

4010 · 2.2.1. Node lithiation · Fig. 5

Author InterpretationHigh supportTransport Mechanism

Lithium thiophosphate functionalisation is interpreted as disrupting low-temperature polysulfide clustering and producing more stable diffusion coefficients.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The low-temperature mechanism is inferred from electrochemical features and variable-temperature 7Li NMR in the cited study.

4014 · 3.2. Polysulfide tethering for low temperature batteries · Fig. 9

Author InterpretationHigh supportStructure Property Link

Lithium thiophosphate node functionalisation improves cycling through polysulfide tethering, but internal porosity remains essential for the effect.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The review's LPS-ZrO2 comparison cautions against attributing performance only to the anchor group without the porous host.

4008 · 2.1.2.2 Open metal site functionalization · Fig. 4

Author InterpretationHigh supportSynthesis Strategy

Maleimide-functionalised UiO-66 demonstrates that molecular sulfide-reactive chemistry can be incorporated into MOF linkers to chemically tether polysulfides.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The review frames the maleimide case as an example of linker chemistry rather than a complete general design rule.

4007 · 2.1.2.1. Organic linker functionalization · Fig. 2

Consensus SummaryHigh supportCaveat

Most MOFs have low electronic conductivity because of strong metal-oxygen bonding at the node, which limits their Li-S battery performance unless transport pathways are engineered.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: This is a broad MOF limitation; conductive MOF subclasses may differ.

4009 · 2.2. Promoting charge transport in MOFs

Consensus SummaryHigh supportDefinition Scope

MOFs are presented as tunable sulfur hosts because their polarity, porosity, conductivity, particle morphology and functional chemistry can be adjusted to confine polysulfides and mobilise charge.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review focuses on MOF cathode additives/hosts and does not claim MOFs alone solve all Li-S engineering constraints.

4005 · 1. Introduction

Author InterpretationHigh supportStructure Property Link

Open or undercoordinated metal sites in MOFs can bind polysulfides and improve retention, with CuBTC used as the review's main example.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The strongest evidence is for Cu-based paddlewheel sites; other node chemistries require separate verification.

4006 · 2.1.1. Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites · Fig. 1

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

The review identifies increasing the concentration of polysulfide anchors as a future chemical need for preventing polysulfide dissolution.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: Anchor density must be balanced with pore accessibility and electrode energy density.

4014 · 4. Conclusions

Author InterpretationHigh supportMeasurement Interpretation

The review states that mapping ion-conduction pathways in MOFs is needed to promote charge mobility and increase charge-discharge rate.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: This is an outlook statement and not a resolved mechanistic conclusion.

4014 · 4. Conclusions

Author InterpretationHigh supportStructure Property Link

For CuBTC@S, smaller particles are interpreted as providing a higher density of undercoordinated surface Cu sites, leading to better polysulfide retention and electrochemical performance.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: Particle-size effects are coupled to morphology and surface chemistry; the review does not separate every variable.

4007 · 2.1.1. Coordinatively unsaturated metal sites · Fig. 1

Author InterpretationHigh supportCaveat

Redox-active loading must be balanced against pore blocking because free pore volume is necessary for high ion flux.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The optimisation is framework-specific; higher redox-site loading is not automatically better.

4012 · 2.2.3. Porosity tuning · Fig. 7

Consensus SummaryHigh supportTransport Mechanism

Li-S cyclability is limited by soluble polysulfide shuttling, which couples mass transport, active-material loss, electrode passivation and impedance.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: This is background consensus in the review, not a new measurement by the review authors.

4005 · 1. Introduction

Secondary benchmarks

Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.

MaterialPropertyReported valueContext and qualityPrimary evidenceReview source
SecondaryLi-UiO-66(50Benz) cathodesMaximum specific capacity1272 mA h g-1 versus 918 mA h g-1 for UiO-66(50Benz)MOF+S cathodes in Li-S cycling
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4010 · 2.2.1. Node lithiation · Fig. 5d
SecondaryLi-UiO-66(50Benz)Room-temperature ionic conductivity1.20 x 10^-8 S cm-1 versus 1.98 x 10^-9 S cm-1 for UiO-66(50Benz)Pressed pellets formed from electrolyte-infiltrated MOF powders at room temperature
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4009 · 2.2.1. Node lithiation · Fig. 5c
SecondaryLi-2,6-Zr-AQ-MOFIonic conductivity4.8 x 10^-7 S cm-1 versus 2.4 x 10^-8 S cm-1 for pristine 2,6-Zr-AQ-MOFPellet EIS of lithiated framework
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4010 · 2.2.2. Redox activity incorporation · Fig. 6d
SecondaryLPS-MOF-808@S/GEC cellsInitial specific capacity858 +/- 51 mA h g-1 with 79.8% capacity retentionGEC composite cathode cycled at C/2
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4013 · 3.1. High-density cathode through materials engineering · Fig. 8
Secondary2xLPS-MOF-808 cellsMaximum capacity increase versus MOF-808300 mA h g-1 increase for 2xLPS-MOF-808Comparison of 0.7x, 1x and 2x LPS-MOF-808 loading
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4008 · 2.1.2.2 Open metal site functionalization · Fig. 4b
SecondaryLPS-UiO-66 cellsSpecific capacity after 100 cycles835 mA h g-1 versus 560 mA h g-1 for UiO-66 cellsAfter 100 cycles in Li-S cells
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4008 · 2.1.2.2 Open metal site functionalization · Fig. 4a
SecondaryLPS-UiO-66 cellsMaximum specific capacity1193 mA h g-1 versus 891 mA h g-1 for parent UiO-66 cellsLong-term Li-S cycling in the cited LPS-MOF study
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4008 · 2.1.2.2 Open metal site functionalization · Fig. 4a
SecondaryMOF-808-LPSLow-temperature discharge capacity after 20 cyclesnearly 810 mA h g-1 after 20 cycles at -10 CC/10 cycling at -10 C; minus sign verified from rendered Fig. 9 page
Text · Approximate
No verified corpus mapping4013 · 3.2. Polysulfide tethering for low temperature batteries · Fig. 9b
SecondaryNU-1000-AQ+SCapacity after 100 cycles693 mA h g-1 after 100 cycles at C/2Long-term cycling at C/2
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4011 · 2.2.3. Porosity tuning · Fig. 7d
SecondaryUiO-66-LPSLow-temperature discharge capacity after 20 cyclesnearly 530 mA h g-1 after 20 cycles at -10 CC/10 cycling at -10 C; minus sign verified from rendered Fig. 9 page
Text · Approximate
No verified corpus mapping4013 · 3.2. Polysulfide tethering for low temperature batteries · Fig. 9b
Secondary2,6-Zr-AQ-MOF cellsHigh-rate specific capacity667 mA h g-1 at 2CRate capability at 2C
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4010 · 2.2.2. Redox activity incorporation · Fig. 6c
Secondary2,6-Zr-AQ-MOF cellsCapacity after 300 cycles719 mA h g-1 after 300 cycles at 1C300 cycles at 1C
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping4010 · 2.2.2. Redox activity incorporation · Fig. 6c

Research gaps

Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.

Polysulfide anchor concentration

High

The review calls for chemical strategies that increase polysulfide-anchor concentration to better prevent dissolution.

Proposed direction: Design higher-density anchor sites while preserving pore accessibility and active-material loading.

4014 · 4. Conclusions

Ion-conduction pathway mapping

High

Ion conduction pathways in MOFs remain insufficiently charted for rational improvement of charge mobility and rate capability.

Proposed direction: Combine electrochemical, spectroscopic and structural probes to identify Li-ion/polysulfide pathways through nodes, pores and guest species.

4014 · 4. Conclusions

Electronic conductivity of MOFs

High

Low electronic conductivity is identified as a major drawback of MOF hosts.

Proposed direction: Tune metal and linker components to improve orbital overlap, through-bond charge delocalisation and framework conductivity.

4014 · 4. Conclusions

Porosity versus functional loading

High

Sulfur and redox-active component infiltration can lower porosity, so charge-transfer gains can conflict with ion-flux needs.

Proposed direction: Optimise pore volume, redox-site loading and conductive substrate selection together rather than maximising any single variable.

4014 · 4. Conclusions

Practical electrode energy density

High

MOF additives can extend cycle life but practical Li-S cells also require high sulfur loading, low electrode porosity and suitable gravimetric and volumetric energy density.

Proposed direction: Evaluate MOF cathode additives under electrode-level metrics including sulfur loading, electrode porosity, volumetric capacity and power density.

4014 · 4. Conclusions

Cited-study map

Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.

Show 18 cited-study records
ReferenceStudyRole and contextCorpus mapping
Ref. 12014Title unavailablebackground_lis_mechanismCited in the introduction for the shuttle effect and Li-S battery limitations.Unmapped
Ref. 42020Title unavailablebackground_lis_mechanismCited as part of the introductory shuttle-effect literature.Unmapped
Ref. 142018Title unavailablemof_tunability_contextCited for synthetic control over MOF properties such as morphology, porosity and conductivity.Unmapped
Ref. 162019Title unavailablemof_tunability_context · review_contextCited for synthetic control and tailorability of MOF properties relevant to Li-S hosts.Unmapped
Ref. 172018Title unavailablemof_lis_contextCited among works using MOFs with different compositions and pore structures to mitigate polysulfide dissolution.Unmapped
Ref. 202013Title unavailableopen_metal_sites · polysulfide_bindingCited as prior evidence that sulfur species bind at Lewis acidic Cu centres.Unmapped
Ref. 252014Title unavailablemof_hosts · open_metal_sitesCited as previous MOF-host work motivating later design strategies and as evidence for sulfur binding at Cu centres.Unmapped
Ref. 322018Title unavailableopen_metal_sites · structure_property_link · polysulfide_bindingPrimary cited study for CuBTC@S, Cu-S binding, particle-size effects and Fig. 1 benchmarks.Unmapped
Ref. 342021Title unavailablelinker_functionalisation · polysulfide_tetheringPrimary cited study for maleimide-functionalised UiO-66 and Fig. 2 cycling/tethering results.Unmapped
Ref. 352019Title unavailablesolid_electrolyte_context · lithium_thiophosphateCited to support lithium phosphorus sulfides as Li-ion conductors and solid-state electrolytes.Unmapped
Ref. 362013Title unavailablepolysulfide_chemistry · lithium_thiophosphateCited for phosphorus sulfides chemically interacting with lithium polysulfides through S-S bond formation.Unmapped
Ref. 372019Title unavailablelithium_thiophosphate · polysulfide_tethering · transport_benchmarkPrimary cited study for node-bound LPS-MOFs, their structural characterisation and cycling benchmarks in Figs. 3-4.Unmapped
Ref. 392018Title unavailablenode_lithiation · ionic_conductivity · transport_benchmarkPrimary cited study for lithiated UiO-66, EIS-derived ionic conductivity and high-rate cycling in Fig. 5.Unmapped
Ref. 412019Title unavailableredox_active_mof · anthraquinone · transport_benchmarkPrimary cited study for AQ-linker Zr-MOFs and redox/transport benchmarks in Fig. 6.Unmapped
Ref. 422019Title unavailableporosity_context · ion_diffusionCited as prior evidence that ion diffusion can be rate-limiting and larger pores can favour charge-transfer efficiency.Unmapped
Ref. 432020Title unavailableporosity_tuning · anthraquinone · transport_benchmarkPrimary cited study for post-synthetic AQ loading and the loading/porosity trade-off in Fig. 7.Unmapped
Ref. 442020Title unavailableelectrode_engineering · volumetric_capacity · transport_benchmarkPrimary cited study for high-density graphene/ethyl-cellulose MOF cathodes and Fig. 8 performance.Unmapped
Ref. 472021Title unavailablelow_temperature · lithium_thiophosphate · polysulfide_clustering · transport_benchmarkPrimary cited study for LPS-functionalised MOFs used as low-temperature Li-S cathode additives in Fig. 9.Unmapped