Electrical conductivity measurement of fabricated composite hydrogels
2D MOF@Pc/DNH · Unknown
Comparison of 3D MOF/DNH, 3D MOF@Pc/DNH, 2D MOF/DNH and 2D MOF@Pc/DNH; method details not specified beyond conductivity reporting.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2D MOF/DNH conductivity | 50 S m-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 2,5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2i |
| 2D MOF@Pc/DNH conductivityMarked as a best value within this paper | 78 S m-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 1,5 · Abstract; Results and Discussion · Figure 2i; Table S1 |
| 3D MOF/DNH conductivity | 16 S m-1 | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2i |
| 3D MOF@Pc/DNH conductivity | 28 S m-1 | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | 4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2i |
| Conductivity increase versus pristine 2D MOF/DNH | about 56% higher | — | — | Text Approximate | 2,5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2i |
| 2D MOF@Pc/DNH conductivity in SI comparison tableMarked as a best value within this paper | 78 S/m | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 30 · Results and discussion · Table S1 |