Sensing Application — One-step electrochemical synthesis of tremella-like Co-MOFs/carbon nanohorns films for enhanced electrochemical sensing of carbendazim in vegetable and fruit samples

Measurement evidence

Sensing Application

One-step electrochemical synthesis of tremella-like Co-MOFs/carbon nanohorns films for enhanced electrochemical sensing of carbendazim in vegetable and fruit samples · Peng G., Gao F., Zou J. et al. · Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry · 2022 · 116462

6 measurement groups · 25 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

DPV analytical calibration for CBZ

Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE composite sensing electrode · Electrode

CBZ concentration series 0.0005, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 uM in 0.1 M PBS, pH 6.0; optimum conditions.

Geometry
Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE
Context
composite target sample
Measurement source
p006-p007 · Section 3.6 · Figure 10; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
CBZ linear range upper bound20.0 uM20000 nMrange upper boundText
Range
p006-p007 · Section 3.6 · Figure 10; Table 1
CBZ linear range lower bound0.5 nM (0.0005 uM)0.5 nMrange lower boundText
Range
p006-p007 · Section 3.6 · Figure 10; Table 1
Calibration R2R2 = 0.993Text
Exact Reported
p006-p007 · Section 3.6 · Figure 10B
Calibration slope3.02 uA/uMText
Exact Reported
p006-p007 · Section 3.6 · Figure 10B
Limit of detection for CBZMarked as a best value within this paper0.2 nM (S/N = 3)0.0002 uMText
Exact Reported
p006-p007 · Section 3.6 · Table 1

Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV)

Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE composite sensing electrode · Electrode

0.1 M PBS, pH 6.0, containing 10.0 uM CBZ; working potential 0.4-1.2 V; pulse width 0.05 s; amplitude 50 mV.

Geometry
Bare GCE and modified GCE electrodes
Context
composite target compared against bare, Co-MOF, and CNH controls
Measurement source
p004-p005 · Sections 2.3 and 3.3 · Figure 6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
CBZ oxidation peak potential on Co-MOFs/GCE0.76 VText
Rounded Reported
p004-p005 · Section 3.3 · Figure 6
CBZ oxidation peak current on Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCEMarked as a best value within this paperabout 58 uA from Figure 6 axisvisual estimateFigure Axis
Approximate
p005 · Section 3.3 · Figure 6

DPV pH optimisation

Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE composite sensing electrode · Electrode

10.0 uM CBZ in 0.1 M PBS over pH 4.0-8.0.

Geometry
Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE
Context
composite target sample
Measurement source
p005-p006 · Section 3.4 · Figure 7
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Epa versus pH fit R2R2 = 0.997Text
Exact Reported
p005-p006 · Section 3.4 · Figure 7B
Epa versus pH slope-0.067 V/pHText
Exact Reported
p005-p006 · Section 3.4 · Figure 7B
Optimal PBS pH for CBZ peak currentMarked as a best value within this paperpH 6.0Text
Exact Reported
p005-p006 · Section 3.4 · Figure 7

DPV standard addition in strawberry and cabbage extracts

Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE composite sensing electrode · Electrode

Real samples centrifuged, filtered through 0.45 um membrane, diluted 100 times with 0.1 M PBS pH 6.0, and analysed by standard addition.

Geometry
Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE
Context
composite target sample
Measurement source
p002 and p006-p008 · Sections 2.4 and 3.8 · Table 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Detected CBZ for cabbage spiked 0.01 uM0.0099 uM detected; RSD 3.63%; recovery 99.0%RSD 3.63%Table
Exact Reported
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Detected CBZ for cabbage spiked 0.04 uM0.0402 uM detected; RSD 1.86%; recovery 100.5%RSD 1.86%Table
Exact Reported
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Detected CBZ for cabbage spiked 0.2 uM0.207 uM detected; RSD 2.32%; recovery 103.5%RSD 2.32%Table
Exact Reported
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Cabbage recovery maximum103.5%range maximumTable
Range
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Cabbage recovery minimum99.0%range minimumTable
Range
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Detected CBZ for strawberry spiked 0.01 uM0.0101 uM detected; RSD 2.66%; recovery 101.0%RSD 2.66%Table
Exact Reported
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Detected CBZ for strawberry spiked 0.04 uM0.0389 uM detected; RSD 2.07%; recovery 97.25%RSD 2.07%Table
Exact Reported
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Detected CBZ for strawberry spiked 0.2 uM0.203 uM detected; RSD 1.69%; recovery 101.5%RSD 1.69%Table
Exact Reported
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Strawberry recovery maximum101.5% in Table 2; text states 101.58%range maximum; text/table rounding discrepancyTable
Rounded Reported
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2
Strawberry recovery minimum97.25%range minimumTable
Range
p008 · Section 3.8 · Table 2

DPV reproducibility, repeatability, and interference tests

Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE composite sensing electrode · Electrode

10.0 uM CBZ in 0.1 M PBS, pH 6.0; seven independent electrodes; one electrode measured twenty times; interferents K+, Na+, Cu2+, Cl-, NO3-, SO4(2-), uric acid, ascorbic acid, fenitrothion, malathion, and thiabendazole.

Geometry
Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE
Context
composite target sample
Measurement source
p006-p008 · Section 3.7 · Figure 11
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Repeatability RSD for twenty repeated measurements2.36%Text
Exact Reported
p006-p008 · Section 3.7 · Figure 11A
Reproducibility RSD across seven electrodes2.45%Text
Exact Reported
p006-p008 · Section 3.7 · Figure 11A
Interference relative errorwithin ca. 5% relative errorca.Text
Approximate
p006-p008 · Section 3.7 · Figure 11B

DPV accumulation-time and electrodeposition-time optimisation

Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE composite sensing electrode · Electrode

10.0 uM CBZ on Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE in 0.1 M PBS, pH 6.0.

Geometry
Co-MOFs/CNHs/GCE
Context
composite target sample
Measurement source
p005-p006 · Section 3.4 · Figure 8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Optimal accumulation timeMarked as a best value within this paper90 sText
Exact Reported
p005-p006 · Section 3.4 · Figure 8A
Optimal electrodeposition timeMarked as a best value within this paper200 sText
Exact Reported
p005-p006 · Section 3.4 · Figure 8B