Computational Modelling — Photoconductive metal-organic frameworks based on 10,20-meso-substituted Zn-porphyrin and fullerene C60

Measurement evidence

Computational Modelling

Photoconductive metal-organic frameworks based on 10,20-meso-substituted Zn-porphyrin and fullerene C60 · Granados-Tavera K., Montenegro-Pohlhammer N., Cardenas-Jiron G. · Surfaces and Interfaces · 2023 · 103002

34 measurement groups · 90 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

1 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.92 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

1@C60 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.48 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

2 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.95 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

2@C60 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.64 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

3 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap1.01 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

3@C60 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.66 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

4 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.83 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

4@C60 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.71 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

5 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.94 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

DFT band structure; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

5@C60 · Model

X-Gamma-Y-A-L-C-B-Z Brillouin-zone path; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
direct band gap0.45 eV——Figure Axis
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 3

Projected density of states; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

1@C60 · Model

Black total DOS; red C60 p orbitals; blue ligand p orbitals; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
6 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
frontier orbital contributionHOCO mainly ligand p orbitals; LUCO mainly C60 p orbitals——Qualitative
Qualitative
8 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4

Projected density of states; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

2@C60 · Model

Black total DOS; red C60 p orbitals; blue ligand p orbitals; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
6 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
frontier orbital contributionHOCO mainly ligand p orbitals; LUCO mainly C60 p orbitals——Qualitative
Qualitative
8 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4

Projected density of states; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

3@C60 · Model

Black total DOS; red C60 p orbitals; blue ligand p orbitals; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
6 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
frontier orbital contributionHOCO mainly ligand p orbitals; LUCO mainly C60 p orbitals——Qualitative
Qualitative
8 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4

Projected density of states; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

4@C60 · Model

Black total DOS; red C60 p orbitals; blue ligand p orbitals; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
6 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
frontier orbital contributionLUCO mainly ligand p orbitals due to NO2 acceptor substituent——Qualitative
Qualitative
8 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4

Projected density of states; PBE+D3/DZP/PseudoDojo

5@C60 · Model

Black total DOS; red C60 p orbitals; blue ligand p orbitals; Fermi level indicated

Context
computational model
Measurement source
6 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
frontier orbital contributionHOCO mainly ligand p orbitals; LUCO mainly C60 p orbitals——Qualitative
Qualitative
8 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Fig. 4

DFT interaction energy with counterpoise BSSE correction

1@C60 · Model

Eint = E(MOF@C60) - E(MOF) - E(C60); periodic model

Context
computational model
Measurement source
7 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE)0.31 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE+D3)Marked as a best value within this paper-0.78 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBES)0.01 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
non-counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE)-0.21 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
non-counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE+D3)-1.33 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
non-counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBES)-0.42 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2

DFT interaction energy with counterpoise BSSE correction

2@C60 · Model

Eint = E(MOF@C60) - E(MOF) - E(C60); periodic model

Context
computational model
Measurement source
7 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE+D3)Marked as a best value within this paper-0.69 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2

DFT interaction energy with counterpoise BSSE correction

3@C60 · Model

Eint = E(MOF@C60) - E(MOF) - E(C60); periodic model

Context
computational model
Measurement source
7 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE+D3)Marked as a best value within this paper-0.98 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2

DFT interaction energy with counterpoise BSSE correction

4@C60 · Model

Eint = E(MOF@C60) - E(MOF) - E(C60); periodic model

Context
computational model
Measurement source
7 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE+D3)Marked as a best value within this paper-0.96 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2

DFT interaction energy with counterpoise BSSE correction

5@C60 · Model

Eint = E(MOF@C60) - E(MOF) - E(C60); periodic model

Context
computational model
Measurement source
7 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
counterpoise-corrected interaction energy (PBE+D3)Marked as a best value within this paper-1.25 eV——Table
Exact Reported
3 · 3.2 Electronic Properties · Table 2

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

1 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a11.55 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.6 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b15.74 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.19 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.39 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.06 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

1@C60 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a12.11 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.46 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b15.47 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.14 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.36 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.62 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
pore size measured between core Zn metals12.1 angstrom——Text
Exact Reported
6 · 3.1 Molecular Structure

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

2 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a11.59 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.86 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b15.72 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.22 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.38 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.12 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

2@C60 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a12.13 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.68 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b15.37 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.25 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.36 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.29 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

3 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a11.71 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.73 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b15.65 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.22 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.39 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.14 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

3@C60 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a12.96 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.27 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b14.55 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta94.4 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.35 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.43 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

4 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a11.57 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.62 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b15.72 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.27 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.39 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

4@C60 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a12.98 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.98 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b14.59 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.39 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.35 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.23 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

5 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a11.66 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha92.39 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b15.68 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta95.49 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.35 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.13 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT geometry optimisation; PBES/DZP/PseudoDojo

5@C60 · Model

Optimised periodic unit cell; Hellmann-Feynman force threshold <0.05 eV/angstrom; 2 x 2 x 2 k-point mesh

Context
computational model
Measurement source
3 · Computational Methods; Results and Discussion · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
lattice parameter a12.85 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter alpha94.67 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter b14.67 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter beta93.11 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter c27.17 angstrom——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1
lattice parameter gamma90.54 degree——Table
Exact Reported
3 · Results and Discussion · Table 1

DFT-NEGF transmission spectrum and PDOS visual analysis

1@C60 · Model

SI Fig. 6S compares transmission spectra and PDOS for full cluster 1 and 1@C60.

Geometry
full molecular junction cluster with linker and Zn-O clusters
Context
computational model
Measurement source
9 · Supporting Information · Figure 6S
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
full-cluster transmission/PDOS support1 and 1@C60 transmission/PDOS plotted; p orbitals belong to the cluster used in the devices——Qualitative
Qualitative
9 · Supporting Information · Figure 6S

DFT-NEGF transmission spectrum and PDOS visual analysis

1@C60_wl · Model

SI Fig. 8S compares transmission spectra and PDOS for reduced clusters 1_wl and 1@C60_wl.

Geometry
reduced molecular junction without linker and Zn-O clusters
Context
computational model
Measurement source
10 · Supporting Information · Figure 8S
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
reduced-cluster transmission/PDOS support1_wl and 1@C60_wl transmission/PDOS plotted with signals closer to the Fermi level than full clusters——Qualitative
Qualitative
10 · Supporting Information · Figure 8S

Transmission orbital analysis under electrode influence

1@C60 · Model

Maximum transmission energy -1.6 eV

Context
computational model
Measurement source
8 · 3.4 Charge transport properties in molecular junction system · Fig. 5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
transmission orbital localisationlarge charge localisation in Zn-O clusters and lesser extent in linkers——Qualitative
Qualitative
9 · 3.4 Charge transport properties in molecular junction system · Fig. 5

Transmission orbital analysis under electrode influence

1@C60_wl · Model

Transmission function at -0.6 eV to Fermi level

Context
computational model
Measurement source
8 · 3.4 Charge transport properties in molecular junction system · Fig. 6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
transmission orbital delocalisationorbitals delocalised throughout porphyrin; signal mainly HOMO-1——Qualitative
Qualitative
9 · 3.4 Charge transport properties in molecular junction system · Fig. 6