Electrical Transport — Tunable Electrical Conductivity of Flexible Metal-Organic Frameworks

Measurement evidence

Electrical Transport

Tunable Electrical Conductivity of Flexible Metal-Organic Frameworks · Chong S., Rogge S.M.J., Kim J. · Chemistry of Materials · 2022 · 254-265

5 measurement groups · 53 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

HSE06 electronic band-structure calculation; CBM dispersion and electron effective mass

Co(NDIDP) computational model · Model

Band paths Gamma-X and Gamma-Z; lp, int1, int2, np, exp, and sq configurations considered.

Atmosphere
in silico
Context
model_system
Measurement source
259 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Co(NDIDP)-exp CBM dispersion Gamma-Z280 meVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6 and Figure S13
Co(NDIDP)-exp band gapEg = 1.73 eVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure S13
Co(NDIDP)-exp electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 0.91m0Text
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6 and Figure S13
Co(NDIDP)-int1 CBM dispersion Gamma-X5 meVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-int1 CBM dispersion Gamma-Z181 meVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-int2 CBM dispersion Gamma-X85 meVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-int2 CBM dispersion Gamma-Z86 meVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-lp CBM dispersion Gamma-Z130 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Co(NDIDP)-lp band gapEg = 1.78 eVText
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 5
Co(NDIDP)-lp electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 2.76m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Co(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-X121 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Co(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-Z211 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Co(NDIDP)-np band gapEg = 1.58 eVText
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 5
Co(NDIDP)-np electron effective mass Gamma-Xme* = 2.36m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Co(NDIDP)-np electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 1.64m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Co(NDIDP)-sq CBM dispersion Gamma-X330 meVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-sq CBM dispersion Gamma-ZMarked as a best value within this paper738 meVText
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-sq Gamma-Z dispersion enhancement versus npfactor of 3.5Text
Rounded Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-sq band gapEg = 1.00 eVText
Exact Reported
262 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure S13
Co(NDIDP)-sq electron effective mass Gamma-Xme* = 1.84m0Text
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Co(NDIDP)-sq electron effective mass Gamma-ZMarked as a best value within this paperme* = 0.37m0Text
Exact Reported
261 · Further Exploration of Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure 6
Maximum band-dispersion increase between configurationsMarked as a best value within this paperup to 5.7-fold increaseText
Rounded Reported
262 · Conclusions
Maximum effective-mass reduction between configurationsMarked as a best value within this paper7.5-fold reduction in effective carrier massText
Rounded Reported
262 · Conclusions

PBE+U-D3(BJ) geometry optimisation plus band-structure calculation

Zn(NDIDP) computational model · Model

Ueff values 7.5 eV for Zn, 3.3 eV for Co, 4.0 eV for Fe; lp and np phases compared.

Atmosphere
in silico
Context
model_system
Measurement source
S37 · Calculations at the DFT+U Theory-Level · Table S4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
DFT+U Co(NDIDP)-np electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 1.71m0SI Table
Exact Reported
S37 · Calculations at the DFT+U Theory-Level · Table S4
DFT+U Fe(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-X128 meVSI Table
Exact Reported
S37 · Calculations at the DFT+U Theory-Level · Table S4
DFT+U Fe(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-Z165 meVSI Table
Exact Reported
S37 · Calculations at the DFT+U Theory-Level · Table S4
DFT+U Zn(NDIDP)-lp CBM dispersion Gamma-Z5 meVSI Table
Exact Reported
S37 · Calculations at the DFT+U Theory-Level · Table S4
DFT+U Zn(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-X87 meVSI Table
Exact Reported
S37 · Calculations at the DFT+U Theory-Level · Table S4
DFT+U Zn(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-Z179 meVSI Table
Exact Reported
S37 · Calculations at the DFT+U Theory-Level · Table S4

HSE06 electronic band-structure calculation; CBM dispersion and electron effective mass

Fe(NDIDP) computational model · Model

Band paths Gamma-X and Gamma-Z corresponding to x- and z-axial directions.

Atmosphere
in silico
Context
model_system
Measurement source
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1 and Figure S9
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Fe(NDIDP)-lp CBM dispersion Gamma-Z212 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Fe(NDIDP)-lp band gapEg = 0.54 eVText
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure S9
Fe(NDIDP)-lp electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 1.71m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Fe(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-X403 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Fe(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-Z633 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Fe(NDIDP)-np band gapEg = 0.16 eVText
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure S9
Fe(NDIDP)-np electron effective mass Gamma-Xme* = 1.17m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Fe(NDIDP)-np electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 0.73m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1

HSE06 electronic band-structure calculation; CBM dispersion and electron effective mass

Zn(NDIDP) computational model · Model

Band paths Gamma-X and Gamma-Z corresponding to x- and z-axial directions.

Atmosphere
in silico
Context
model_system
Measurement source
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1 and Figure S8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Zn(NDIDP)-lp CBM dispersion Gamma-Z83 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Zn(NDIDP)-lp band gapEg = 2.39 eVText
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure S8
Zn(NDIDP)-lp electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 4.37m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Zn(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-X73 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Zn(NDIDP)-np CBM dispersion Gamma-Z200 meVTable
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Zn(NDIDP)-np band gapEg = 2.20 eVText
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Figure S8
Zn(NDIDP)-np electron effective mass Gamma-Xme* = 3.02m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1
Zn(NDIDP)-np electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 1.51m0Table
Exact Reported
260 · Electrical Conductivity of M(NDIDP) and Configuration-Dependent CT · Table 1

Computed electronic band structures and PDOS

Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 computational model · Model

Experimentally observed lp phase and computationally predicted np phase of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3.

Atmosphere
in silico
Context
model_system
Measurement source
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-lp CBM dispersion Gamma-Z123 meVText
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-lp band gapEg = 2.05 eVText
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-lp electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 4.37m0Text
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-np CBM dispersion Gamma-X45 meVText
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-np CBM dispersion Gamma-Z264 meVText
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-np band gapEg = 1.70 eVText
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-np electron effective mass Gamma-Xme* = 6.68m0Text
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23
Zn(NDIDP)-CH3-np electron effective mass Gamma-Zme* = 0.84m0Text
Exact Reported
S28 · Flexibility and Conductivity of Zn(NDIDP)-CH3 · Figure S23