Electrochemistry Application — Enhanced bioelectrochemical performance caused by porous metal-organic framework MIL-53(Fe) as the catalyst in microbial fuel cells

Measurement evidence

Electrochemistry Application

Enhanced bioelectrochemical performance caused by porous metal-organic framework MIL-53(Fe) as the catalyst in microbial fuel cells · Wang H., Jiang L., Chen J. et al. · Process Biochemistry · 2020 · 147-153

5 measurement groups · 24 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Cyclic voltammetry (CV)

MIL-53(Fe)-coated glassy carbon electrode · Electrode

CHI660E electrochemical workstation; conventional three-electrode system; 50 mM PBS; GCE coated catalyst working electrode; SCE reference electrode; Pt sheet counter electrode; O2-saturated and O2-free PBS for ORR comparison.

Atmosphere
O2-saturated and O2-free PBS electrolyte
Geometry
three-electrode GCE working electrode vs SCE
Context
MIL-53(Fe)-coated GCE; ORR catalyst test
Measurement source
2,4-5 · 2.3; 3.2 · Fig. 4a-b
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
CV oxidation peak potential-0.26 V vs SCEText
Rounded Reported
4 · 3.2 · Fig. 4a
Oxidation peak current vs scan speed R2R2 = 0.960Text
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 · Fig. 4c
CV reduction peak potential-0.05 V vs SCEText
Rounded Reported
4 · 3.2 · Fig. 4a
Reduction peak current vs scan speed R2R2 = 0.904Text
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2 · Fig. 4c
CV scan rates10, 25, 50, 75, 100 mV/sCaption
Exact Reported
4 · Figure caption · Fig. 4b

Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV)

MIL-53(Fe)/SS air cathode · Electrode

LSV comparison of MIL-53(Fe)/SS and bare SS under the electrochemical test conditions reported for ORR.

Atmosphere
PBS electrolyte; gas condition not specified for Fig. 4d
Geometry
electrode potential vs SCE
Context
MIL-53(Fe)/SS composite compared with bare SS control
Measurement source
4-5 · 3.2 · Fig. 4d
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Maximum current of MIL-53(Fe) electrodeMarked as a best value within this paperapproximately 0.05 mAapproximatelyText
Approximate
5 · 3.2 · Fig. 4d
Maximum current of bare SS electrodeapproximately 0.005 mAapproximatelyText
Approximate
5 · 3.2 · Fig. 4d

MFC power density and polarisation curves

Single-compartment MFC with MIL-53(Fe)/SS cathode · Electrode

When voltage was stable, resistance was gradually reduced from 2000 ohm to 20 ohm to obtain power-density and polarisation curves.

Atmosphere
operating MFC
Geometry
single-compartment MFC with MIL-53(Fe)/SS cathode; compared to bare SS cathode MFC
Context
MIL-53(Fe)/SS composite cathode versus bare SS control
Measurement source
5-6 · 3.3. Air-cathode performance in MFC · Fig. 5a-c
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Cathode-limited MFC performanceanode potential slightly changed whereas cathode potential significantly changedQualitative
Qualitative
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5c
Power-curve resistance sweep end20 ohmText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5a-b
Power-curve resistance sweep start2000 ohmText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5a-b
Open-circuit voltage of MIL-53(Fe)/SS MFC650 mV0.65 VText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5b
Maximum power density of bare SS MFC5.4 mW/m25.4 mW/m2Text
Exact Reported
6 · 4. Conclusions · Fig. 5b
Power-density enhancement over bare electrodeMarked as a best value within this paper73.5 timesText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3; Conclusions · Fig. 5b
Maximum power density of MIL-53(Fe)/SS MFCMarked as a best value within this paper397 +/- 6.3 mW/m2397 mW/m2+/- 6.3 mW/m2Text
Exact Reported
1,6 · Abstract; 3.3; Conclusions · Fig. 5b
Current density at peak MIL-53(Fe)/SS power densityapproximately 1.25 mA/m2 from Fig. 5b peak positionvisual estimate from axisVisual Estimate
Approximate
5 · Figure · Fig. 5b

Single-compartment microbial fuel cell operation

Single-compartment MFC with MIL-53(Fe)/SS cathode · Electrode

Cathode on one side of MFC; catalytic layer facing anode across PEM; graphite felt anode 5.0 cm diameter; titanium wire; anaerobic activated sludge; 1000 mg/L glucose and 50 mM PBS medium refreshed when voltage below 0.02 V.

Atmosphere
anaerobic anode chamber; air cathode
Geometry
anode chamber 3.0 cm long, 2.5 cm radius; single-compartment MFC
Context
MIL-53(Fe)/SS cathode in MFC
Measurement source
3 · 2.5. MFC structure and initiation
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
MFC initiation external resistance510 ohmText
Exact Reported
3 · 2.5
MFC glucose concentration1000 mg/L glucoseText
Exact Reported
3 · 2.5
MFC PBS concentration50 mM PBSText
Exact Reported
3 · 2.5

Voltage versus time cycling

Single-compartment MFC with MIL-53(Fe)/SS cathode · Electrode

Continuous MFC output voltage recorded; Fig. 5d caption states external resistance of 500 ohm.

Atmosphere
operating MFC
Geometry
single-compartment MFC with MIL-53(Fe)/SS cathode; bare SS control
Context
MIL-53(Fe)/SS composite cathode versus bare SS control
Measurement source
5-6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5d
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Stable-output durationone week7 daysText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5d
Continuous-operation durability durationmaximum voltage did not decrease in one month of continuous operationText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5d
Stable voltage output of MIL-53(Fe)/SS MFCapproximately 0.37 V with little change in one week0.37 VapproximatelyText
Approximate
1,6 · Abstract; 3.3 · Fig. 5d
Maximum voltage enhancement over bare electrodeMarked as a best value within this paper7.64 timesText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5d
Maximum voltage of MIL-53(Fe)/SS MFCMarked as a best value within this paper0.42 V0.42 VText
Exact Reported
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 5d
Displayed voltage-time durationapproximately 700 h shown on Fig. 5d x-axisvisual estimate from axisFigure Axis
Approximate
5 · Figure · Fig. 5d