Computational Modelling — Catalysing the performance of Li-sulfur batteries with two-dimensional conductive metal organic frameworks

Measurement evidence

Computational Modelling

Catalysing the performance of Li-sulfur batteries with two-dimensional conductive metal organic frameworks · Bhauriyal P., Heine T. · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · 2022 · 12400-12408

13 measurement groups · 49 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Charge density difference and Bader charge analysis

Co3(HOTP)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Charge transfer between S8 or Li2Sx species and each modelled 2D MOF surface.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic adsorbate-slab model
Geometry
2D MOF surface adsorption model
Context
Li2Sx/S8 adsorbed on model frameworks
Measurement source
PDF p4-p5 / article p12403-p12404 · 3.2.1 Anchoring of Li2Sx on 2D MOFs · Figure 2c-d
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Li2S2 to Co3(HOTP)2 charge transferMarked as a best value within this paper1.38 |e|1.38 |e|Text
Exact Reported
PDF p5 / article p12404 · 3.2.1 Anchoring of Li2Sx on 2D MOFs · Figure 2d; Figure S5
S8-to-MOF charge transfer lower endpoint0.002-0.04 |e|0.002 |e|range endpointText
Range
PDF p5 / article p12404 · 3.2.1 Anchoring of Li2Sx on 2D MOFs · Figure 2d
S8-to-MOF charge transfer upper endpoint0.002-0.04 |e|0.04 |e|range endpointText
Range
PDF p5 / article p12404 · 3.2.1 Anchoring of Li2Sx on 2D MOFs · Figure 2d

DFT optimised structure, magnetic moment and HSE06 electronic band-gap calculation

Co3(HITP)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Pristine Co3(HITP)2 monolayer model.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic vacuum slab model
Geometry
2D monolayer periodic cell
Context
pristine model framework
Measurement source
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
electronic band gap0.24 eV0.24 eVTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
lattice constant21.92 A21.92 AngstromTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
magnetic moment per unit cell3 muB per cell3 muB per cellTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1

DFT optimised structure, magnetic moment and HSE06 electronic band-gap calculation

Co3(HOTP)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Pristine Co3(HOTP)2 monolayer model.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic vacuum slab model
Geometry
2D monolayer periodic cell
Context
pristine model framework
Measurement source
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Figure 1; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
effective electronic band gap0 eV; half-metallic0 eVTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
lattice constant21.51 A21.51 AngstromTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
magnetic moment per unit cell3 muB per cell3 muB per cellTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
spin-down band gap0.25 eV0.25 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Figure 1

PBE-D3 band structure and projected density of states calculation

S8 adsorbed Co3(THT)2 periodic DFT model · Model

S8 and Li2S adsorbed Co3(THT)2 monolayers; Fermi energy set to zero.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic adsorbate-slab model
Geometry
2D monolayer adsorption model
Context
guest-loaded Co3(THT)2 adsorption models
Measurement source
SI p5-p6 / S5-S6 · Figure S7 text · Figure S7
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Li2S adsorbed Co3(THT)2 band gap0.22 eV0.22 eVText
Exact Reported
SI p5 / S5 · Figure S7 text · Figure S7
retained electronic conductivity after adsorptionsmall band gaps suggest Co3(THT)2 can retain high electrical conductivityQualitative
Qualitative
PDF p7 / article p12406 · 3.3 Triangle of reactivity · Figure S7
S8 adsorbed Co3(THT)2 band gap0.39 eV0.39 eVText
Exact Reported
SI p5 / S5 · Figure S7 text · Figure S7
S8 adsorption-induced valence DOS onsetafter ca. -0.9 eV region-0.9 eVca.Text
Approximate
SI p5 / S5 · Figure S7 text · Figure S7

DFT optimised structure, magnetic moment and HSE06 electronic band-gap calculation

Co3(THT)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Pristine Co3(THT)2 monolayer model.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic vacuum slab model
Geometry
2D monolayer periodic cell
Context
pristine model framework
Measurement source
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Figure 1; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
electronic band gap0.40 eV0.4 eVTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
lattice constant23.22 A23.22 AngstromTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
magnetic moment per unit cell3 muB per cell3 muB per cellTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1

DFT average adsorption energy and surface loading calculation

S8 adsorbed Co3(THT)2 periodic DFT model · Model

S8 molecules allowed to completely cover both sides of the Co3(THT)2 unit-cell surface.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic adsorbate-slab model
Geometry
both sides of Co3(THT)2 unit cell
Context
S8-loaded Co3(THT)2 model
Measurement source
SI p6 / S6 · Figure S8 text · Figure S8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
average adsorption energy for maximum-loading model-0.47 eV for 10 Li2S adsorbed on both sides of unitcell-0.47 eVText
Exact Reported
SI p6 / S6 · Figure S8 text · Figure S8
maximum sulfur loading capacityMarked as a best value within this paper71.8 %71.8 wt%Text
Exact Reported
SI p6 / S6 · Figure S8 text · Figure S8

DFT optimised structure, magnetic moment and HSE06 electronic band-gap calculation

Cu3(HITP)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Pristine Cu3(HITP)2 monolayer model.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic vacuum slab model
Geometry
2D monolayer periodic cell
Context
pristine model framework
Measurement source
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Figure 1; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
electronic band gap0 eV; metallic0 eVTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Figure 1; Table 1
lattice constant22.09 A22.09 AngstromTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
magnetic moment per unit cell0 muB per cell0 muB per cellTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1

VASP periodic spin-polarised DFT; PBE-GGA; PAW; Grimme DFT-D3; CI-NEB for diffusion/decomposition barriers; HSE06 for electronic band gaps in Table 1

Co3(THT)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Plane-wave cutoff 520 eV; SCF convergence 1e-5 eV per atom; force convergence below 1e-2 eV Angstrom-1; Monkhorst-Pack meshes 5 x 5 x 1 for optimisation and 15 x 15 x 1 for electronic calculations; 25 Angstrom z-vacuum.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic vacuum slab model
Geometry
2D monolayer periodic cell
Context
applies to all five pristine model frameworks and adsorbed Li2Sx/S8 models
Measurement source
PDF p2 / article p12401 · 2. Computational details
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
plane-wave cutoff energy520 eV520 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p2 / article p12401 · Computational details
vacuum spacing along z25 A25 AngstromText
Exact Reported
PDF p2 / article p12401 · Computational details

DFT Gibbs free energy profile using Norskov model and zero-point-energy correction

Co3(THT)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Discharge lithiation sequence S8* -> Li2S8* -> Li2S4* -> Li2S2* -> Li2S* on MOF surfaces; entropy term neglected at 0 K.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic adsorbate-slab model
Geometry
2D MOF surface reaction pathway
Context
Li2Sx/S8 adsorbed on model framework
Measurement source
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.1 Discharging process · Figure 4
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Li2S4@MOF to Li2S2@MOF Gibbs free energy change-0.99 eV-0.99 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.1 Discharging process · Figure 4
rate-limiting Li polysulfide reduction Gibbs free energyMarked as a best value within this paper0.68 eV0.68 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.1 Discharging process · Figure 4

CI-NEB Li2S decomposition barrier calculation

Co3(THT)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Li2S decomposition path Li2S -> LiS + Li+ + e-; direct path-1 and indirect path-2 considered for each MOF, with preferred dissociative path used for barriers.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic adsorbate-slab model
Geometry
2D MOF surface decomposition pathway
Context
Li2S adsorbed on model framework
Measurement source
PDF p6-p7 / article p12405-p12406 · 3.2.3.2 Charging process · Figure 5; Table S1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Li2S decomposition barrier1.18 eV1.18 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.2 Charging process · Figure 5; Table S1
Li2S decomposition barrier1.27 eV1.27 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.2 Charging process · Figure 5; Table S1
Li2S decomposition barrier1.06 eV1.06 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.2 Charging process · Figure 5; Table S1
Li2S decomposition barrierMarked as a best value within this paper0.73 eV0.73 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.2 Charging process · Figure 5; Table S1
Li2S decomposition barrier1.08 eV1.08 eVText
Exact Reported
PDF p6 / article p12405 · 3.2.3.2 Charging process · Figure 5; Table S1

DFT adsorption energy calculation, Eads = EMOF-Li2Sx - EMOF - ELi2Sx

Co3(THT)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Li2Sx species with x = 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and S8 adsorbed on modelled 2D MOFs; most stable adsorption conformations selected.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic adsorbate-slab model
Geometry
2D MOF surface adsorption model
Context
pristine model framework with Li2Sx/S8 adsorbates
Measurement source
PDF p2-p5 / article p12401-p12404 · Computational details; 3.2.1 Anchoring of Li2Sx on 2D MOFs · Figure 2; Table S1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, least negative endpoint-0.85 to -1.98 eV-0.85 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, most negative endpoint-0.85 to -1.98 eV-1.98 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, least negative endpointMarked as a best value within this paper-1.93 to -3.54 eV-1.93 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, most negative endpointMarked as a best value within this paper-1.93 to -3.54 eV-3.54 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, least negative endpoint-1.40 to -2.68 eV-1.4 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, most negative endpoint-1.40 to -2.68 eV-2.68 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, least negative endpoint-1.14 to -1.60 eV-1.14 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, most negative endpoint-1.14 to -1.60 eV-1.6 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, least negative endpoint-0.98 to -1.44 eV-0.98 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li2S8-Li2S binding energy range, most negative endpoint-0.98 to -1.44 eV-1.44 eVrange endpointSI Table
Range
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1

CI-NEB Li+ diffusion barrier calculation

Co3(THT)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Li atom diffusion from one stable interaction site to a neighbouring site along MOF surface path-1; path-2 through pore also considered.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic vacuum slab model
Geometry
2D MOF surface diffusion pathway
Context
pristine model framework
Measurement source
PDF p5-p6 / article p12404-p12405 · 3.2.2 Diffusivity · Figure 3; Table S1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Li+ diffusion barrier0.26 eV0.26 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li+ diffusion barrier1.08 eV1.08 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
PDF p5 / article p12404 · 3.2.2 Diffusivity · Figure 3c; Table S1
Li+ diffusion barrier0.68 eV0.68 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
SI p4 / S4 · Table S1 · Table S1
Li+ diffusion barrier0.76 eV0.76 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
PDF p5 / article p12404 · 3.2.2 Diffusivity · Figure 3b; Table S1
Li+ diffusion barrierMarked as a best value within this paper0.22 eV0.22 eVSI Table
Exact Reported
PDF p5 / article p12404 · 3.2.2 Diffusivity · Figure 3c; Table S1

DFT optimised structure, magnetic moment and HSE06 electronic band-gap calculation

Ni3(HITP)2 periodic monolayer DFT model · Model

Pristine Ni3(HITP)2 monolayer model.

Temperature
0
Atmosphere
periodic vacuum slab model
Geometry
2D monolayer periodic cell
Context
pristine model framework
Measurement source
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Figure 1; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
electronic band gap0.12 eV0.12 eVTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
lattice constant21.88 A21.88 AngstromTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1
magnetic moment per unit cell0 muB per cell0 muB per cellTable
Exact Reported
PDF p3 / article p12402 · 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Table 1