cMOF Evidence Base
Electrical Transport — Gas-Induced Electrical and Magnetic Modulation of Two-Dimensional Conductive Metal–Organic Framework

Measurement evidence

Electrical Transport

Gas-Induced Electrical and Magnetic Modulation of Two-Dimensional Conductive Metal–Organic Framework · Meng Z., Stolz R.M., De Moraes L.S. et al. · Angewandte Chemie - International Edition · 2024 · e202404290

1 measurement group · 21 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

chemiresistive conductance response at constant 1.0 V

Cu3(C6O6)2 chemiresistive device on gold IDE · Electrode

NH3, H2S, NO diluted from 1% tanks in dry N2; 1-40 ppm or 1%; target exposure 10 min and N2 purge 20 min unless specified

Temperature
room temperature
Atmosphere
dry N2 baseline and analyte/N2 streams
Geometry
drop-cast MOF on gold IDE with 5 um gaps
Context
pristine MOF device exposed to analyte gases
Measurement source
S5-S6 · Chemiresistive Tests
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
1% H2S response multiplier versus 40 ppm103 times higher——Text
Exact Reported		4 · Electrical Response
1% NH3 response multiplier versus 40 ppm8 times higher——Text
Exact Reported		4 · Electrical Response
1% NO response multiplier versus 40 ppm25 times higher——Text
Exact Reported		4 · Electrical Response
H2S apparent rate constant1.23 min-1——Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
H2S recovery after N2 purge25 %——Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
H2S response at 40 ppm after 10 minMarked as a best value within this paper79.4 +/- 3.1 %—+/- 3.1 %Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
H2S calibration slope, Figure 2ey = 1.35x + 1.80; R2 = 0.98——Visual Estimate
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
H2S LOD, main textMarked as a best value within this paper25 ppb——Text
Rounded Reported		4 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
H2S LOD, SI Figure S625.1 ppb——Caption
Exact Reported		S9 · Chemiresistive Tests · Figure S6
NH3 LOD, main text/Figure 2Marked as a best value within this paper14 ppb——Text
Exact Reported		4 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NH3 LOD, SI Figure S68.3 ppb——Caption
Exact Reported		S9 · Chemiresistive Tests · Figure S6
NO LOD, main textMarked as a best value within this paper13 ppb——Text
Rounded Reported		4 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NO LOD, SI Figure S612.8 ppb——Caption
Exact Reported		S9 · Chemiresistive Tests · Figure S6
NH3 pseudo-first-order rate constant4.78 min-1——Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NH3 recovery after N2 purge93 %——Visual Estimate
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NH3 response at 40 ppm saturationMarked as a best value within this paper84.2 +/- 1.6 %—+/- 1.6 %Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NH3 calibration slope, Figure 2dy = 4.00x - 5.86; R2 = 0.98——Visual Estimate
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NO pseudo-first-order rate constant0.73 min-1——Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NO response drop/recovery after N2 purge53 %——Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NO response at 40 ppm after 10 minMarked as a best value within this paper-697.3 +/- 42.2 %—+/- 42.2 %Text
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2
NO calibration slope, Figure 2fy = -12.04x - 12.03; R2 = 0.95——Visual Estimate
Exact Reported		3 · Electrical Response · Figure 2