Porosity — Cu/Fe-MOFs based on mixed ligands: Synthesis, crystal structure and electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance

Measurement evidence

Porosity

Cu/Fe-MOFs based on mixed ligands: Synthesis, crystal structure and electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance · Sun X., Yang L., Chen P. et al. · Journal of Molecular Structure · 2024 · 137968

2 measurement groups · 8 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

N2 adsorption-desorption, BET surface area, and BJH pore-size distribution

Cu-MOF single crystals · Single Crystal

Cu-MOF N2 isotherm and BJH inset in Fig. 5a; BET values in Table 2.

Atmosphere
N2
Geometry
bulk powder/crystals
Context
pristine Cu-MOF
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2; Fig. 5a
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Cu-MOF average pore size7.906 nmTable
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2
Cu-MOF BET surface area1.4716 m2 g-1Table
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2
Cu-MOF optimal pore size from BJH distribution4 nmText
Rounded Reported
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Fig. 5a
Cu-MOF pore volume0.00259 cm3 g-1Table
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2

N2 adsorption-desorption, BET surface area, and BJH pore-size distribution

Fe-MOF single crystals · Single Crystal

Fe-MOF N2 isotherm and BJH inset in Fig. 5b; BET values in Table 2.

Atmosphere
N2
Geometry
bulk powder/crystals
Context
pristine Fe-MOF
Measurement source
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2; Fig. 5b
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Fe-MOF average pore sizeMarked as a best value within this paper16.521 nmTable
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2
Fe-MOF BET surface areaMarked as a best value within this paper3.3349 m2 g-1Table
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2
Fe-MOF optimal pore size from BJH distributionMarked as a best value within this paper100 nmText
Rounded Reported
5 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Fig. 5b
Fe-MOF pore volumeMarked as a best value within this paper0.01392 cm3 g-1Table
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2 X-ray diffraction (XRD) · Table 2