Conclusion and Perspectives
587States remaining needs: larger macrocyclic and 3D-promoting ligands, heteroatom/functional-group design, ionic pathways and functional pillars.
Relevance: Core · 587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
Hoai T. B. Pham, Ji Yong Choi, Michael Stodolka, and Jihye Park · Accounts of Chemical Research · 2024
Summarise the Park group's design logic for overcoming limited molecular accessibility and limited functional diversity in electrically conductive MOFs while preserving charge transport.
The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.
States remaining needs: larger macrocyclic and 3D-promoting ligands, heteroatom/functional-group design, ionic pathways and functional pillars.
Relevance: Core · 587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
Frames EC-MOFs as porous conductors whose 2D structures and restricted functional building blocks limit accessibility and functional diversity.
Relevance: Core · 580 · Conspectus
Frames functional ligands and metal-node functionalisation as ways to add ion selectivity, metalation and proton-conducting pathways without losing electronic conduction.
Relevance: Core · 585 · Imparting Diverse Functionality in EC-MOFs
Defines MOFs and EC-MOFs, contrasts conventional carboxylate MOF tunability with EC-MOF conductivity requirements, and introduces d-p conjugation as a main transport motif.
Relevance: Core · 581 · Introduction
Explains why HHTC and EP macrocycles can increase theoretical and experimental surface area while retaining planar conjugation and pi-pi stacking.
Relevance: Core · 582 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2
Develops accessibility strategies: macrocyclic ligand pockets, improved crystallinity, larger channels, pillar insertion and metal-node geometry tuning.
Relevance: Core · 581 · Enhancing Molecular Accessibility within EC-MOFs · Figure 1
Describes requirements for postsynthetic pillar insertion and shows how square-planar, tetrahedral and octahedral coordination geometries change EC-MOF dimensionality and accessibility.
Relevance: Core · 584 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 5
Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.
Coordination geometry is used to rationalise why similar ligand symmetry can lead to 2D or 3D EC-MOF architectures and altered accessibility.
Categories: square-planar nodes producing honeycomb 2D lattices · tetrahedral nodes producing 3D frameworks · octahedral nodes preserving in-plane conjugation while adding axial ligands
584 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 5
Figure 1 organises the review around routes to overcome stacked-layer, non-macrocyclic-ligand and underutilised-site limitations in 2D EC-MOFs.
Categories: accessibility through expanded interlayer distance · accessibility and functionality through intrinsic macrocyclic pockets · functionality through metal-node or ligand functionalisation
581 · Introduction · Figure 1
The review distinguishes ligand-pocket hosting and metal-node axial substitution as ways to add function without destroying conductive pathways.
Categories: functional ligand pockets · metal-node axial ligands · postsynthetic pillar insertion
585 · Imparting Diverse Functionality in EC-MOFs
The review compares common benzene and triphenylene EC-MOF motifs with HHTC and EP macrocycles to explain how intrinsic pockets and larger channels increase theoretical surface area.
Categories: benzene-derived hexasubstituted ligands · triphenylene-derived ligands · HHTC macrocyclic ligands · EP macrocyclic ligands
582 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2
Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.
Conductive frameworks where metal-node geometry, rather than ligand symmetry alone, promotes three-dimensional structures.
Conduction: Effective conjugation is retained while tetrahedral or octahedral coordination creates non-2D architectures.
Representative materials: Zn-based 3D semiconductive MOF · 3D Fe-THQ EC-MOF
Nodes / linkers: Zn(II) · Fe · hexasubstituted benzene · tetrahydroxyquinone
584 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 5
2D EC-MOFs built from hexasubstituted benzene or triphenylene ligands coordinated to square-planar metal nodes.
Conduction: Rigid planar conjugated ligands and square-planar metal nodes support in-plane d-p conjugation and pi-pi interlayer pathways.
Representative materials: Ni3(HIB)2 · Cu3(HIB)2 · HHTP-based EC-MOFs
Nodes / linkers: Cu(II) · Ni(II) · hexasubstituted benzene · triphenylene · HITP/HHTP-like conjugated cores
582 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2
Cu-O coordinated 2D EC-MOFs using HHTC or EP macrocyclic ligands with intrinsic alkyne-rich pockets.
Conduction: Planar, shape-persistent and fully conjugated macrocycles satisfy d-p conjugation prerequisites while retaining conductive Cu-O4 node motifs.
Representative materials: Cu-HHTC · Cu-EP
Nodes / linkers: Cu(II) · 2,3,8,9,14,15-hexahydroxyltribenzocyclyne · ethynylphenanthrene
582 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2
A postsynthetically modified Cu-THQ EC-MOF in which 4,4'-bipyridyl pillars convert a 2D framework toward a 3D expanded architecture.
Conduction: The account frames BPY coordination as expanding layer spacing while preserving in-plane ligand-metal bonding.
Representative materials: Cu-THQ · Cu-THQ-BPY
Nodes / linkers: Cu · tetrahydroxy-1,4-benzoquinone · 4,4'-bipyridyl pillar
584 · Pillar Insertion · Figure 4
Iron HHTP EC-MOF with octahedral Fe nodes and axial DMF-derived distortion that expands interlayer spacing.
Conduction: Octahedral geometry is interpreted as retaining d-p conjugation within 2D layers while axial ligands increase interlayer spacing.
Representative materials: Fe-HHTP
Nodes / linkers: Fe · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene · axial DMF ligands
585 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 6
Zn-HHTP EC-MOFs with replaceable axial water ligands that can be substituted by urea to introduce proton-conducting sites.
Conduction: The framework is described as an electronically conducting platform that can gain proton conduction through hydrogen-bonding axial ligand substitution.
Representative materials: Zn-HHTP-H2O · Zn-HHTP-urea
Nodes / linkers: Zn · HHTP · axial water · urea
587 · Functionalization of Metal Nodes · Figure 8
Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.
Use octahedral metal nodes with replaceable axial ligands so functional molecules can be installed postsynthetically while keeping the conductive in-plane network.
Claimed effects: Introduces proton-conducting pathways while retaining electronic conductivity in the same order of magnitude.
Controlling variables: weak axial ligand lability · functional molecule hydrogen-bonding ability · relative humidity · temperature · framework retention after substitution
Representative materials: Zn-HHTP-H2O · Zn-HHTP-urea
Caveat: The example is promising but framed as a platform approach; generality across other EC-MOFs remains a future direction.
586 · Functionalization of Metal Nodes · Figure 8
Select metal nodes and axial ligands that shift frameworks from square-planar 2D sheets toward tetrahedral or octahedral geometries and expanded accessible structures.
Claimed effects: Enables 3D or expanded-layer EC-MOFs with higher expected porosity and enhanced accessibility.
Controlling variables: metal identity · coordination geometry · axial ligand presence · effective conjugation
Representative materials: Zn-based 3D EC-MOF · Fe-THQ · Fe-HHTP
Caveat: Geometry changes must preserve electronic coupling; axial ligands are framed as useful only when d-p conjugation remains intact.
584 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 5
Replace smaller benzene/triphenylene motifs with HHTC or EP macrocycles whose alkyne pockets add internal surface area and host sites while preserving planar conjugation.
Claimed effects: Raises accessible surface area, introduces additional pores and enables transition-metal or alkali-ion hosting.
Controlling variables: macrocycle size · intrinsic pocket diameter · ligand planarity · metal-ligand bond reversibility · framework crystallinity
Representative materials: Cu-HHTC · Cu-EP
Caveat: Large ligands alone are insufficient; poor crystallinity can keep experimental surface areas below theoretical values.
582 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2
Insert axial pillar ligands into a 2D EC-MOF to expand interlayer distance and add through-layer porosity.
Claimed effects: Can increase surface area, generate new pores and improve electrochemical capacitance through better electrolyte access.
Controlling variables: metal-node preference for square-planar and octahedral geometries · pillar basicity · pi-accepting character · framework stability during exfoliation or insertion
Representative materials: Cu-THQ-BPY
Caveat: Requires overcoming strong pi-pi stacking and avoiding degradation or disruption of in-plane bonding.
583 · Pillar Insertion
Use HHTC and EP ligand pockets as host sites for transition metals or size-selected alkali ions.
Claimed effects: Adds sensing, catalytic or ion-selective functionality and offers a tunable handle over surface area and conductivity.
Controlling variables: pocket size · ion diameter · electron-rich alkyne character · metalation dose · pocket occupancy
Representative materials: Co-metalated Cu-HHTC · Ni-metalated Cu-HHTC · Cs-metalated Cu-EP
Caveat: The review presents functionality as promising; specific sensing or catalytic performance still requires primary-paper validation.
585 · Functional Ligands · Figure 7
These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.
Greater pore accessibility is treated as important for electrolyte, analyte and substrate access in energy storage, sensing and electrocatalysis.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: Accessibility alone does not guarantee application performance; electronic coupling and crystallinity remain coupled constraints.
581 · Enhancing Molecular Accessibility within EC-MOFs
Changing metal-node coordination geometry can shift EC-MOF dimensionality from 2D honeycomb sheets toward 3D or expanded-layer frameworks with greater accessibility.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The accessibility benefit depends on preserving effective conjugation while changing geometry.
584 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 5
The review interprets lower Warburg coefficient for Cu-EP than Cu-HHTC as evidence for more effective electrolyte diffusion due to larger channels and pockets.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: This is an electrochemical interpretation from EIS in the cited primary study, not an independently established review measurement.
583 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 3
Electrical conductivity in the EC-MOF class is commonly pursued through effective d-p conjugation between conjugated organic cores and metal nodes.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review does not resolve microscopic transport mechanisms for all EC-MOFs.
581 · Introduction
Replacing axial water with urea in Zn-HHTP is interpreted as adding proton hopping sites while keeping electronic conductivity in the same order.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The account reports a single platform example; primary humidity- and temperature-dependent data remain the authority.
587 · Functionalization of Metal Nodes · Figure 8
Most EC-MOFs adopt 2D structures with modest surface areas and short interlayer distances, so the same design features that help conductivity can limit molecular accessibility.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The statement is a review-level synthesis rather than a universal rule for every EC-MOF.
581 · Introduction
Functionalising EC-MOF building blocks can disrupt preferred geometries and conducting pathways, making functional diversity harder than in conventional MOFs.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The contrast with conventional MOFs is broad and application-dependent.
585 · Imparting Diverse Functionality in EC-MOFs
The account identifies functional pillars as a future route to combine increased accessibility and new chemical functionality in EC-MOFs.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: Presented as an outlook rather than demonstrated broadly.
587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
Increasing ligand size can raise theoretical surface area, but experimental surface area depends strongly on crystallinity.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review focuses on BET-accessible surface area, not necessarily all forms of molecular accessibility.
581 · Enhancing Molecular Accessibility within EC-MOFs
HHTC and EP macrocyclic ligands are interpreted as simultaneously increasing surface area and creating host pockets while satisfying planar conjugation requirements.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The account centres on the authors' own materials and should be cross-checked against primary papers for detailed metrics.
582 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2
Pillar insertion into EC-MOFs requires metal nodes able to accommodate axial ligands and pillars with suitable donor and acceptor character.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review notes the approach was not previously reported for EC-MOFs and derives part of the design logic from computation.
583 · Pillar Insertion
Ion occupancy in macrocyclic pockets is presented as a chemical handle for tuning surface area and conductivity.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The review discusses Cs/Li selectivity in Cu-EP; generality across other ions and frameworks is not established here.
586 · Functional Ligands · Figure 7
Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.
| Material | Property | Reported value | Context and quality | Primary evidence | Review source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SecondaryCu-EP | electrical conductivity | 1.0 x 10^-3 S/cm | Review comparison to other 2D EC-MOFs with CuO4 nodes Text · Exact Reported | research_0086 | 583 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2d |
| SecondaryCs-metalated Cu-EP | Cs pocket occupancy | approximately 52% of pockets | Postsynthetic alkali-ion metalation; Li not detected in paired comparison Text · Approximate | research_0086 | 586 · Functional Ligands · Figure 7e,f |
| SecondaryCu-EP | BET surface area | 1502 m2/g | N2 sorption; review text summary of macrocyclic ligand EC-MOF Text · Exact Reported | research_0086 | 583 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2d |
| SecondaryCu-EP | Warburg coefficient | 1100 | EIS electrolyte diffusion comparison against Cu-HHTC Text · Exact Reported | research_0086 | 583 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 3d |
| SecondaryCu-HHTC | electrical conductivity | 3.0 x 10^-3 S/cm | Review comparison to other 2D EC-MOFs with CuO4 nodes Text · Exact Reported | research_0025 | 583 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2d |
| SecondaryCu-HHTC | BET surface area | 1193 m2/g | N2 sorption; review text summary of macrocyclic ligand EC-MOF Text · Exact Reported | research_0025 | 583 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 2d |
| SecondaryCu-HHTC | Warburg coefficient | 45 000 | EIS electrolyte diffusion comparison against Cu-EP Text · Exact Reported | research_0025 | 583 · Macrocyclic Ligand Motifs · Figure 3d |
| SecondaryCu-THQ-BPY | gravimetric capacitance | 66.1 F/g at 10 mV/s | Cyclic voltammetry, 10 mV/s, 1 M aqueous KOH Text · Exact Reported | research_0038 | 584 · Pillar Insertion · Figure 4d,e |
| SecondaryCu-THQ-BPY | new pore width after BPY insertion | 7.3 A | NL-DFT pore width distribution from N2 sorption after pillar insertion Text · Exact Reported | research_0038 | 584 · Pillar Insertion · Figure 4c |
| SecondaryCu-THQ-BPY | BET surface area after pillar insertion | 139.5 to 196.9 m2/g | BET surface area before and after postsynthetic BPY pillar insertion Text · Exact Reported | research_0038 | 584 · Pillar Insertion · Figure 4c |
| SecondaryFe-HHTP | double-layer capacitance gain | approximately 150% higher than Cu and Ni analogs | Relative double-layer capacitance comparison to Cu and Ni analogues Text · Approximate | research_0017 | 585 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 6 |
| SecondaryFe-HHTP | expanded interlayer distance | approximately 12.9 A versus approximately 3.4 A common stacking distance | DMF-distorted Fe-HHTP structure compared with common 2D stacking distance Text · Approximate | research_0017 | 585 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 6a,b |
| SecondaryFe-HHTP | BET surface area | 675 m2/g | N2 sorption of Fe-HHTP Text · Exact Reported | research_0017 | 585 · Coordination Geometry · Figure 6c |
| SecondaryZn-HHTP-H2O | electrical conductivity | 4.5 x 10^-2 S/cm | 343 K and 95% relative humidity Text · Exact Reported | research_0039 | 587 · Functionalization of Metal Nodes · Figure 8d,e |
| SecondaryZn-HHTP-H2O | proton conductivity | 1.6 x 10^-5 S/cm | 343 K and 95% relative humidity Text · Exact Reported | research_0039 | 587 · Functionalization of Metal Nodes · Figure 8d,e |
| SecondaryZn-HHTP-urea | proton conductivity | up to 1.0 x 10^-4 S/cm | After postsynthetic urea treatment; 343 K and 95% relative humidity context Text · Exact Reported | research_0039 | 587 · Functionalization of Metal Nodes · Figure 8d,e |
Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.
EC-MOFs must overcome limited molecular accessibility and functional diversity to become practical beyond promising demonstrations.
Proposed direction: Combine intrinsic pockets, expanded interlayer distances and molecular-level functionalisation while preserving charge transport.
587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
Functional pillars are proposed as a route to combine interlayer expansion and added chemical function, but the account presents this as future work.
Proposed direction: Develop pillars that both increase molecular accessibility and introduce useful chemical functionality.
587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
EC-MOF ligands that include heteroatoms and functional groups for pre- or postsynthetic modification are still needed.
Proposed direction: Design redox-compatible ligand functionalities that do not disrupt the geometry required for conductive pathways.
587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
Ionic conducting pathways, including Li+ and Na+ pathways, are proposed but remain underdeveloped in EC-MOFs.
Proposed direction: Introduce suitable interactive functionalities at metal nodes to support ionic conduction alongside electronic transport.
587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
Larger macrocyclic ligands with spacious pockets and 3D-promoting ligands remain a future need for greater accessibility.
Proposed direction: Explore macrocycles and ligand structures that tailor pore shapes and apertures for targeted applications.
587 · Conclusion and Perspectives
Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.
| Reference | Study | Role and context | Corpus mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. 12022 | From 2D to 3D: Postsynthetic Pillar Insertion in Electrically Conductive MOF | pillar_insertion · accessibility_benchmark · electrochemical_contextUsed as the account's proof of postsynthetic BPY pillar insertion, higher surface area, new pore formation and enhanced capacitance. | research_0038 |
| Ref. 22022 | Imparting Functionality and Enhanced Surface Area to a 2D Electrically Conductive MOF via Macrocyclic Linker | macrocyclic_ligand · surface_area_benchmark · pocket_functionalitySupports the macrocyclic linker strategy and Cu-HHTC surface area, conductivity and transition-metal hosting discussion. | research_0025 |
| Ref. 32023 | 2D Conjugated Metal-Organic Framework as a Proton-Electron Dual Conductor | mixed_conduction · metal_node_functionalisation · proton_transportUsed for axial-ligand substitution on Zn-HHTP and proton-electron dual conduction benchmarks. | research_0039 |
| Ref. 42024 | Macrocyclic Ligand-Driven Ion Selectivity and High Surface Area in a 2D Conductive MOF | macrocyclic_ligand · ion_selectivity · surface_area_benchmarkSupports Cu-EP surface area, electrolyte diffusion, Cs/Li ion selectivity and pocket-occupancy claims. | research_0086 |
| Ref. 122020 | Electrically Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks | background_review · transport_motif · field_scopeCited for conductive MOF background, carboxylate-MOF insulation contrast and d-p conjugation design constraints. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 132023 | 2D Metal-Organic Frameworks as an Emerging Platform with Tunable Electronic Structures | background_review · electronic_structureCited in the introduction for electronic-structure background and the insulating nature of typical carboxylate MOFs. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 172018 | Robust and Conductive Two-Dimensional Metal-organic Frameworks with Exceptionally High Volumetric and Areal Capacitance | 2d_ec_mof_baseline · electrochemical_contextUsed as an example of square-planar Cu/Ni 2D honeycomb EC-MOFs and as application background for energy storage. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 182021 | Metal-Organic Framework-Based Hierarchically Porous Materials: Synthesis and Applications | accessibility_context · porosity_backgroundCited for the general premise that accessibility enables interactions with electrolytes, analytes and substrates. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 222023 | In Silico High-Throughput Design and Prediction of Structural and Electronic Properties of Low-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks | theoretical_surface_area · ligand_motif_contextSource for theoretical surface-area ceilings and the gap between predicted and experimental EC-MOF surface areas. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 232021 | Electronic Challenges of Retrofitting 2D Electrically Conductive MOFs to Form 3D Conductive Lattices | pillar_insertion_theory · electronic_structureCited for computational criteria governing whether pillar insertion can create bonding rather than nonbonding interactions in 2D EC-MOFs. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 252021 | Atomically Precise Single-Crystal Structures of Electrically Conducting 2D Metal-Organic Frameworks | crystallinity · 2d_ec_mof_structureUsed as an illustrative example that ligand design can improve crystallinity and bridge theoretical and experimental surface areas. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 272017 | Signature of Metallic Behavior in the Metal-Organic Frameworks M3(Hexaiminobenzene)2 (M = Ni, Cu) | 2d_ec_mof_baseline · metallic_behaviourUsed as part of the square-planar 2D honeycomb EC-MOF baseline. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 372020 | High Thermopower in a Zn-Based 3D Semiconductive Metal-Organic Framework | 3d_ec_mof · coordination_geometry · thermoelectric_contextUsed as an example where Zn(II) tetrahedral geometry produces a 3D framework rather than square-planar 2D sheets. | research_0141 |
| Ref. 382020 | Valence-Dependent Electrical Conductivity in a 3D Tetrahydroxyquinone-Based Metal-Organic Framework | 3d_ec_mof · coordination_geometry · electrical_conductivityUsed as an example of an octahedral Fe-based 3D EC-MOF with THQ ligands. | research_0066 |
| Ref. 392022 | Iron-Based 2D Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Nanostructure with Enhanced Pseudocapacitance | coordination_geometry · surface_area_benchmark · electrochemical_contextSupports the Fe-HHTP interlayer expansion, surface-area and capacitance-gain discussion. | research_0017 |
| Ref. 412019 | Single Crystals of Electrically Conductive Two-Dimensional Metal-Organic Frameworks: Structural and Electrical Transport Properties | 2d_ec_mof_baseline · transport_propertiesCited as part of the comparison set for common HHTP-based EC-MOF surface areas. | research_0005 |
| Ref. 422012 | New Porous Crystals of Extended Metal-Catecholates | 2d_ec_mof_baseline · porosity_baselineCited as part of the HHTP-based comparison set for Fe-HHTP accessibility. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 432020 | Postsynthetic Modification: An Enabling Technology for the Advancement of Metal-Organic Frameworks | postsynthetic_modification · conventional_mof_contextUsed to contrast broad conventional MOF functionalisation with more constrained EC-MOF functionalisation. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 452014 | Tuning the Structure and Function of Metal-Organic Frameworks via Linker Design | linker_design · conventional_mof_contextUsed as conventional MOF linker-functionality context before contrasting EC-MOF constraints. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 541989 | Synthesis and Structural and Theoretical Characterization of a Nickel(0) Complex of Tribenzocyclyne (TBC) and the Preparation of a Novel Organometallic Conductor | macrocyclic_pocket_context · metalation_contextCited for precedent relevant to transition-metal hosting in HHTC-like macrocyclic pockets. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 551994 | Crystal Structures of Synthetic 7 A and 10 A Manganates Substituted by Mono- and Divalent Cations | ion_size_context · ion_selectivityCited for ionic diameter context used in the Cs versus Li pocket selectivity discussion. | Unmapped |