Pham H.T.B., Choi J.Y., Fang X. et al. · Chem · 2024 · 199-210
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Cu-EP shows much higher capacitive performance than Cu-HHTC in 1 M Na2CO3, attributed to larger surface area, larger pockets/channels, and additional redox activity.
Caveat: Electrochemical measurements use MOF/Super P/PTFE composite electrodes, so values are application performance rather than intrinsic framework transport.
204-205 · Electrochemical properties · Figure 4; Table S5 · Linked to 5 structured results
After Cs metalation, Cs ions are assigned to in-plane intrinsic pockets rather than between adjacent planes.
Caveat: Assignment relies on simulated PXRD comparison and absence of between-plane peaks.
206 · Post-synthetic metalation · Figure S30-S31 · Linked to 2 structured results
The intrinsic pockets of Cu-EP selectively host Cs+ over Li+.
Caveat: Selectivity evidence combines experimental metalation/XPS/EDS and molecular model calculations.
205 · Post-synthetic metalation · Figures S26-S27; Tables S6-S7 · Linked to 5 structured results
Cu-EP reaches a record-high surface area among reported 2D EC-MOFs because the macrocyclic EP ligand contributes large intrinsic pockets and channels.
Caveat: Record claim is relative to the comparison set cited by the authors through 2023.
203 · Structure characterization of Cu-EP · Figure S20; Table S4 · Linked to 3 structured results
Water improves Cu-EP crystallinity by acting as a base to deprotonate the EP ligand during synthesis.
Caveat: Mechanistic inference is based on DFT pKa trends and synthesis optimisation rather than direct in situ observation.
201 · Synthesis and optimization of Cu-EP · Tables S1-S2; Figure S16 · Linked to 3 structured results
Cu-EP is an electrically conductive 2D MOF with pressed-pellet conductivity around 10^-3 S/cm and activated transport with Ea about 0.2 eV.
Caveat: Bulk pellet conductivity may be affected by pellet density and grain boundaries.
203-204 · Electronic structure characterization · Figure 3B; Table S4 · Linked to 2 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-EP | Cu3(EP)2; reported as Cu3EP2 for pristine frameworkcopper nodes; mixed Cu(I)/Cu(II) observed by XPS · macrocyclic ethynylphenanthrene (EP) ligand | 2D · Pristine2D electrically conductive MOF; hexagonal P6/mmm; AA slipped-parallel packing best fits PXRD | 201 · Synthesis and optimization of Cu-EP |
| Cu-HHTC | Cu-HHTCcopper nodes · HHTC ligand (2,3,8,9,14,15-hexahydroxyltribenzocyclyne) | 2D · PristineAnalogous 2D electrically conductive MOF control constructed from a TC derivative | 204 · Electrochemical properties |
| EP ligand | macrocyclic ethynylphenanthrene ligandphenanthrenediol and ethynyl units | 0D · Model SystemMacrocyclic ligand precursor and computational/complexation model system | 201 · Synthesis and optimization of Cu-EP · Figure 1C |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-EP-Cs-0.5research_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | post-synthetic metalation with 0.5 equiv CsNO3 | S30 · EDS characterization · Table S8 |
| Cu-EP-Cs-1research_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | post-synthetic metalation with 1 equiv CsNO3 | 206 · Post-synthetic metalation |
| Cu-EP-Cs-2research_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | post-synthetic metalation with 2 equiv CsNO3 | 205 · Post-synthetic metalation |
| Cu-EP-CsOAc-2research_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | post-synthetic metalation with 2 equiv CsOAc | S32 · Electronic structures of pristine Cu-EP and its metalated samples · Table S11 |
| Cu-EP/Super P/PTFE modified glassy carbon electroderesearch_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | drop-cast ink dried at 65 C for 15 minglassy carbon electrode, 3 mm diameter | 208 · Electrochemical characterization |
| Cu-EP-Li-2research_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | post-synthetic metalation attempt with 2 equiv LiNO3 | 205 · Post-synthetic metalation |
| pressed Cu-EP pelletresearch_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Pellet · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | approximately 5 mg powder pressed in 5 mm die under 1.5 Tonsmicrocaliper-measured; value not reported | S5 · Conductivity measurements |
| pristine Cu-EP powderresearch_0086__mat__mat_cu_ep | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | black solids isolated, washed and vacuum dried | 208 · Synthesis of Cu-EP |
| Cu-HHTC/Super P/PTFE modified glassy carbon electroderesearch_0086__mat__mat_cu_hhtc | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | drop-cast MOF inkglassy carbon electrode, 3 mm diameter | S3 · Electrochemical characterization |
| pressed Cu-HHTC pelletresearch_0086__mat__mat_cu_hhtc | Pellet · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | approximately 5 mg powder pressed in 5 mm die under 1.5 Tonsmicrocaliper-measured; value not reported | S5 · Conductivity measurements · Table S4 |
| Cu-HHTC powderresearch_0086__mat__mat_cu_hhtc | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | black solid product dried in vacuum oven | S25 · Synthesis of Cu-HHTC · Figure S23 |
| EP ligand modelresearch_0086__mat__mat_ep_ligand | Model · Model System · Model | DFT and solution complexation model | S2 · Computational details |