Electrical Transport — Macrocyclic ligand-driven ion selectivity and high surface area in a 2D conductive MOF

4 measurement groups · 10 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

four-point probe bulk conductivity

Electrical conductivity

pressed Cu-EP pellet · Pellet

Pressed pellet under ambient conditions; approximately 5 mg in 5 mm die under 1.5 Tons; no binder or conducting additive

Temperature: ambient
Atmosphere: ambient
Geometry: pressed pellet
Context: pristine target framework
Measurement source: 203 · Electronic structure characterization · Figure S20; Table S4

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
bulk electrical conductivityMarked as a best value within this paper	1.02 x 10^-3 S/cm	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S23 · Comparison in surface areas and conductivity · Table S4

temperature-dependent four-point probe conductivity; Arrhenius fit

Electrical conductivity

pressed Cu-EP pellet · Pellet

Conductivity as function of temperature 293-363 K fitted to Arrhenius equation

Temperature: 293-363
Atmosphere: vacuum
Geometry: pressed pellet
Context: pristine target framework
Measurement source: 204 · Electronic structure characterization · Figure 3B

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
thermal activation energyMarked as a best value within this paper	0.2 eV	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	204 · Electronic structure characterization · Figure 3B

four-point probe conductivity of metalated pellets

Electrical conductivity

Cu-EP-Cs-0.5 · Powder

Conductivity variations of pristine Cu-EP and Cs metalated samples; Table S11 gives pristine, CsNO3 low-dose and CsOAc samples; Figure 5B shows trend with Cs occupancy

Temperature: ambient
Atmosphere: ambient
Geometry: pressed pellet
Context: metalated Cu-EP samples
Measurement source: S32 · Electronic structures of pristine Cu-EP and its metalated samples · Table S11; Figure 5B

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
conductivity of oxidized Cu-EP-Cs-0.5Marked as a best value within this paper	0.60 +/- 0.06 mS/cm	0.0006 S/cm	+/- 0.06 mS/cm	SI Table Exact Reported	S32 · Electronic structures of pristine Cu-EP and its metalated samples · Table S11
conductivity of Cu-EP-Cs-1	approximately 0.4 mS/cm from Figure 5B	0.0004 S/cm	visual estimate	Visual Estimate Approximate	206 · Post-synthetic metalation · Figure 5B
conductivity of Cu-EP-Cs-2	approximately 0.3 mS/cm from Figure 5B	0.0003 S/cm	visual estimate	Visual Estimate Approximate	206 · Post-synthetic metalation · Figure 5B
band gap after CsNO3 metalation	0.86 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S32 · Electronic structures of pristine Cu-EP and its metalated samples · Table S11
band gap after CsOAc metalation	0.83 eV	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S32 · Electronic structures of pristine Cu-EP and its metalated samples · Table S11
conductivity of non-oxidized CsOAc-metalated Cu-EPMarked as a best value within this paper	0.75 +/- 0.07 mS/cm	0.00075 S/cm	+/- 0.07 mS/cm	SI Table Exact Reported	S32 · Electronic structures of pristine Cu-EP and its metalated samples · Table S11
pristine Cu-EP conductivity in metalation comparison table	0.90 +/- 0.10 mS/cm	0.0009 S/cm	+/- 0.10 mS/cm	SI Table Exact Reported	S32 · Electronic structures of pristine Cu-EP and its metalated samples · Table S11

four-point probe bulk conductivity

Electrical conductivity

pressed Cu-HHTC pellet · Pellet

Pressed pellet comparison value reported for Cu-HHTC in Table S4

Temperature: ambient
Atmosphere: ambient
Geometry: pressed pellet
Context: Cu-HHTC pristine control
Measurement source: S23 · Comparison in surface areas and conductivity · Table S4

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Cu-HHTC control conductivity	2.47 x 10^-3 S/cm	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S23 · Comparison in surface areas and conductivity · Table S4