Review · secondary evidenceReview

Metal-organic frameworks for thermoelectric energy-conversion applications

A. Alec Talin, Reese E. Jones, and Patrick E. Hopkins · MRS Bulletin · 2016

This dossier represents secondary evidence: section summaries, claims and benchmarks are paraphrased for this database, not quoted. Check quantitative values against the linked primary study, and cite the review itself (10.1557/mrs.2016.242) for its arguments.

6review sections
6material families
15review claims
17secondary benchmarks
36cited studies
7research gaps

Review scope

Review recent advances and design logic for metal-organic frameworks and Guest@MOFs as thermoelectric materials, focusing on Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and tunability through metal, ligand, and guest selection.

Coverage
1911–2016
Category
Core Thermoelectric
Material scope
Conducting metal-organic frameworks and Guest@MOFs · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 as the main MOF thermoelectric example · Conducting polymers and coordination polymers used as thermoelectric comparators · Conventional Bi2Te3-based thermoelectric comparators
Transport scope
Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, power factor and figure of merit · Electronic structure effects of guest infiltration · Lattice and electronic thermal conductivity · Phonon-glass/electron-crystal design logic in MOFs
Application scope
Near-ambient thermoelectric energy conversion · Wearable electronics and sensors powered by body heat · Low-cost large-area thermoelectric fabrication on paper or fabric
Explicit exclusions
Exhaustive synthetic recipes for individual MOF films · Primary-data extraction beyond selected review benchmarks · Comprehensive coverage of all thermoelectric inorganic materials
Source
877 · Abstract
Evidence role
Context, taxonomy and secondary benchmarking

Section map

The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.

Introduction

877-878

Defines the Seebeck effect, figure of merit ZT, power factor and the coupled tradeoffs among S, sigma and kappa.

Relevance: Core · 877 · Introduction · Equation 1

Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics

878-879

Frames MOFs and Guest@MOFs as crystalline, porous, thermally stable alternatives to polymers whose electronic and thermal transport can be tuned through metal, ligand and guest choice.

Relevance: Core · 879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics

Summary

881

Concludes that MOFs could combine inorganic-like structural order with organic-like tunability and low cost, but TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 remains limited by low electrical conductivity.

Relevance: Core · 881 · Summary

TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric

879-880

Reviews Cu3(BTC)2 deposition, TCNQ infiltration, measured Seebeck response, conductivity, thermal conductivity, TDTR measurement and the low power factor bottleneck.

Relevance: Core · 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figures 1-2

Thermoelectric materials

878

Compares inorganic Bi2Te3 alloys, conducting polymers and coordination polymers, highlighting cost/processability benefits and n-type organic limitations.

Relevance: Core · 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I

Thermal transport in MOFs

880-881

Explains low lattice thermal conductivity in MOFs using phonon-glass/electron-crystal reasoning, heterogeneous bonds, soft open structures, guest effects and weak temperature dependence.

Relevance: Core · 880 · Thermal transport in MOFs · Figure 3

Taxonomies

Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.

Dominant Charge-Carrier Sign

p-type and n-type thermoelectric elements

The review uses Seebeck sign and thermoelectric-generator architecture to separate p-type and n-type materials, then identifies stable n-type organic conductors as a key scarcity.

Categories: p-type hole conductors · n-type electron conductors

878 · Thermoelectric materials

Porosity And TunabilityAuthor-proposed

Coordination polymers versus MOFs

The review distinguishes MOFs from broader coordination polymers by long-range crystalline order and pores that can adsorb guest molecules or nanostructures to tune transport.

Categories: nonporous coordination polymers · porous MOFs · guest-infiltrated MOFs

879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics

Guest Mass And BindingAuthor-proposed

Guest effects on MOF lattice thermal conductivity

The thermal-transport section classifies guests by likely effect on kappal, from little impact to rattler-driven reductions or stiffening-driven increases.

Categories: weakly interacting light guests · abundant light guests · heavy loosely bound rattlers · bond-stiffening infiltrants

881 · Thermal transport in MOFs

Material Family ComparisonAuthor-proposed

Thermoelectric material platforms

The article moves from conventional inorganic benchmarks to organic polymers and then to MOFs/Guest@MOFs as a hybrid platform with tunable crystalline porous structure.

Categories: Bi2Te3-based inorganic semiconductors · conducting polymers · coordination polymers · MOFs · Guest@MOFs

878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I

Performance Metric Components

Thermoelectric performance decomposition

The review organises TE performance through ZT = S2sigmaT/kappa and uses this framing to compare polymers, coordination polymers, MOFs and inorganic standards.

Categories: Seebeck coefficient S · Electrical conductivity sigma · Thermal conductivity kappa · Power factor S2sigma · Figure of merit ZT

877 · Introduction · Equation 1

Heat Transport Channel

Thermal conductivity components

The review separates lattice and electronic thermal conductivity and uses the Wiedemann-Franz relationship to explain why improving carrier transport can increase heat transport.

Categories: lattice thermal conductivity kappal · electronic thermal conductivity kappae

878 · Introduction

Material families

Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.

Bi2Te3-based inorganic thermoelectrics

Inorganic Crystalline Semiconductor Alloys

Conventional inorganic semiconductors and alloys used as high-performance TE benchmarks.

Conduction: Low-bandgap semiconductor transport with mature TE performance but limited processability for complex or low-cost large-area substrates.

Representative materials: Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 · Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 · Bi2Te3 and alloys

Nodes / linkers: Bi · Sb · Te · Se · not applicable

878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I

Conducting polymer thermoelectrics

Long Molecular Chains With Varying Crystallinity

Organic conjugated polymers considered for flexible, processable, low-cost thermoelectrics.

Conduction: Transport relies on doped conjugated chains; dopants improve carrier concentration but may introduce disorder and reduce mobility.

Representative materials: PEDOT:PSS · polyacetylene · polyaniline · polypyrrole

Nodes / linkers: not applicable · conjugated polymer backbones · polystyrene sulfonate dopant

878 · Thermoelectric materials

Metal-ethenetetrathiolate coordination polymers

Nonporous Coordination Polymer

Repeating metal-organic coordination complexes used as p-type and n-type polymeric TE comparators.

Conduction: Electronic structure is dominated by transition-metal d electrons and their interaction with organic ligands rather than only carbon-backbone pi orbitals.

Representative materials: Poly(Cux[Cu-ett]) · Poly(Kx[Ni-ett])

Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · K counterion · 1,1,2,2-ethenetetrathiolate

878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I

MOFs and Guest@MOFs

Crystalline Porous Frameworks

Crystalline porous metal-organic frameworks whose electronic and geometric structure can be tuned by metal, ligand and guest selection.

Conduction: MOF crystallinity may promote mobility while pores allow guest molecules to tune electronic and thermal transport.

Representative materials: Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 · MOF-5 · MOF-74

Nodes / linkers: Cu · Zn and other MOF nodes · benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate · TCNQ guest molecules · porous organic linkers

877 · Abstract

TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 Guest@MOF

Face-Centred-Cubic Porous MOF With Molecular Guest Infiltration

Cu3(BTC)2 framework infiltrated with TCNQ molecules that bridge Cu(II) dimers and create an electronic conduction pathway.

Conduction: TCNQ LUMO levels near the Cu3(BTC)2 valence band shift EF toward the valence band, giving p-type Seebeck response but low conductivity.

Representative materials: TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 · Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ

Nodes / linkers: Cu(II) dimers · benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate · tetracyanoquinodimethane guest

879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1

Low-thermal-conductivity MOFs

Porous Crystalline Frameworks With Large Unit Cells

Open, mechanically soft MOFs whose complex, heterogeneous structures can reduce lattice thermal conductivity.

Conduction: Low-energy propagation velocities, mass/bond heterogeneity and phonon scattering can lower kappal, although porosity and disorder may harm electrical conductivity.

Representative materials: MOF-5 · MOF-74 · Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2

Nodes / linkers: Zn · Cu · mixed MOF metal nodes · porous organic linkers · guest molecules

881 · Thermal transport in MOFs · Figure 3

Synthesis strategies

Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.

Maintain crystallinity while reducing lattice thermal conductivity

The review argues that intentionally reducing vibrational energy-transfer length scales is preferable to introducing atomic disorder that may damage charge transport.

Claimed effects: A viable path to high ZT is to preserve electrical transport while suppressing kappal through nanoscale vibrational mechanisms.

Controlling variables: crystallinity · phonon mean free path · structural disorder · porosity

Representative materials: MOFs · Guest@MOFs

Caveat: Increasing porosity can lower heat transport but is expected to have detrimental effects on electrical conductivity and hence ZT.

880 · Thermal transport in MOFs

Minimise dopant volume and control oxidation state in conducting polymers

The review describes polymer TE optimisation as requiring dopants for conductivity while limiting dopant-induced disorder and insulating volume fraction.

Claimed effects: Precise control is associated with high PEDOT:PSS power factor, but interpretation can be confounded by measurement geometry.

Controlling variables: dopant volume fraction · oxidation state · chain-to-chain coupling · carrier concentration

Representative materials: PEDOT:PSS

Caveat: Dopants can occupy volume, introduce disorder, decrease coupling and depress mobility.

878 · Thermoelectric materials

Guest engineering for lattice thermal conductivity

Guest infiltration is proposed not only for electronic tuning but also for controlling vibrational scattering, bond heterogeneity and rattling-like acoustic modes.

Claimed effects: Heavy loosely bound guests may reduce kappal by localised modes, enhanced anharmonicity and lower group velocities, while other guests may stiffen bonds.

Controlling variables: guest mass · host-guest binding strength · bond heterogeneity · pore loading · anharmonicity

Representative materials: Guest@MOFs · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 · zeolites · skutterudites · clathrates

Caveat: The review explicitly cautions that TCNQ infiltration can increase calculated lattice thermal conductivity through bond stiffening.

881 · Thermal transport in MOFs

Guest-molecule infiltration to create electronic pathways

TCNQ infiltration into Cu3(BTC)2 is reviewed as a way to bridge Cu(II) dimers, create a conduction pathway and shift electronic states near the Fermi level.

Claimed effects: TCNQ increases conductivity by many orders of magnitude and produces p-type thermopower, but the resulting power factor remains low.

Controlling variables: guest molecule electron affinity · guest loading · pore connectivity · host-guest orbital alignment

Representative materials: TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2

Caveat: The review notes that the low electrical conductivity of TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 is still the main performance limitation.

879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1

Tune MOF electronic structure by metal and ligand choice

MOFs are presented as synthetically versatile systems where metal and ligand selection can tune electronic structure for p-type or n-type ZT.

Claimed effects: Appropriate metal-ligand choices could optimise electronic structure and promote charge mobility without depressing Seebeck coefficient.

Controlling variables: metal node · organic ligand · crystalline order · band alignment

Representative materials: conducting MOFs · Guest@MOFs

Caveat: The field was described as in its infancy, with only TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 explored for TE applications at that time.

879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics

Solution growth and inkjet printing of MOF thin films

The review identifies solution-based thin-film growth and inkjet printing as routes to pattern MOF layers and contacts on low-cost substrates.

Claimed effects: Inkjet printing is attractive for low-cost TE fabrication because relatively thick patterned layers and collectors can be rapidly deposited on paper or fabrics.

Controlling variables: deposition method · substrate · pattern geometry · current collector deposition

Representative materials: Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2

Caveat: Device-relevant conductivity still depends on framework crystallinity and guest infiltration quality.

879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1b

Review claims

These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.

Author InterpretationMedium supportMaterial Comparison

Coordination polymers offer an alternative to all-organic polymers because transition-metal d electrons and ligand interactions dominate their electronic structure.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The high-performing n-type poly(Kx[Ni-ett]) lacks a demonstrated solution-based processing route according to the review.

878 · Thermoelectric materials

DescriptiveHigh supportHistorical Development

As of the review, MOF thermoelectrics were at an early stage, with TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 the only MOF explored for TE applications.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: This statement is time-bound to the 2016 review and should not be treated as current beyond that date.

879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics

Author InterpretationMedium supportCaveat

Guest molecules can either reduce or increase lattice thermal conductivity, so guest infiltration is not automatically beneficial for ZT.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review contrasts rattler-like reduction mechanisms with TCNQ-related bond stiffening in calculated crystalline MOF models.

881 · Thermal transport in MOFs

DescriptiveHigh supportMaterial Comparison

Bi2Te3-family inorganic semiconductors remain efficient benchmark materials, but their cost, toxicity and poor compatibility with complex large-area structures motivate alternatives.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review emphasises niche and near-ambient applications rather than all TE deployment contexts.

878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I

Consensus SummaryHigh supportTransport Mechanism

Electrical conductivity and electronic thermal conductivity are linked, so increasing carrier transport can also increase kappae.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The claim is most relevant where electronic heat conduction becomes non-negligible; low-carrier semiconductors are lattice-conductivity dominated.

878 · Introduction

Consensus SummaryHigh supportTransport Mechanism

MOF lattice thermal conductivity can be low because mass and bond-stiffness heterogeneity, open soft structures and short vibrational energy-transfer lengths reduce phonon transport.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: The review warns that increasing porosity can harm electrical conductivity and ZT.

880 · Thermal transport in MOFs

SpeculativeMedium supportApplication Relevance

The review's outlook is that conductive porous frameworks and Guest@MOFs are promising for thermoelectric applications if conductivity and guest-tuned transport can be improved.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The review explicitly states that TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 is still too low in sigma to be an attractive thermoelectric.

881 · Summary

Author InterpretationMedium supportStructure Property Link

MOFs could overcome polymer disorder while retaining low cost and tunability because long-range crystalline order may increase charge mobility and pores allow guest-based tuning.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The article presents this as a promising design rationale rather than a demonstrated high-ZT MOF result.

879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics

Consensus SummaryHigh supportConsensus

Stable high-performance n-type organic semiconductors are scarce because many conjugated polymers have LUMO levels that are too high relative to vacuum.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The review notes newer electron-deficient systems but reports power factors below leading p-type polymer values.

878 · Thermoelectric materials

Consensus SummaryHigh supportCaveat

Conducting polymers are attractive for low-cost flexible TEs, but their dopants can introduce insulating volume, structural disorder and lower chain-to-chain coupling.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: This is a broad review generalisation over conducting polymers and does not replace primary morphology or doping data.

878 · Thermoelectric materials

Consensus SummaryHigh supportTransport Mechanism

Large Seebeck coefficients often occur in lightly doped semiconductors with rapidly varying density of states near EF, but low carrier concentration can limit conductivity and ZT.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The statement is a review-level use of the Mott expression, not a MOF-specific measurement.

877 · Introduction · Equation 2

Author InterpretationMedium supportStructure Property Link

TCNQ infiltration is interpreted as moving EF from mid-gap toward the Cu3(BTC)2 valence band because TCNQ LUMO levels lie close to the host valence band.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The claim relies on calculated density of states shown in the review's Figure 1 rather than a direct transport-only measurement.

879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1c-d

Author InterpretationHigh supportMaterial Comparison

TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 has a large Seebeck coefficient and low thermal conductivity, but its low electrical conductivity dominates the low power factor and low ZT.

Evidence basis: single_reference

Caveat: The review suggests improving crystallinity may raise sigma but may also increase kappa.

880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 2

Consensus SummaryMedium supportTransport Mechanism

Typical semiconducting organic materials, Bi2Te3 and MOF-5 are presented as showing only slight increases in kappa with temperature, resembling glassy or amorphous materials rather than conventional T-1 crystalline behaviour.

Evidence basis: multi_reference

Caveat: This is a review-level comparison from Figure 3 across different studies and material types.

881 · Thermal transport in MOFs · Figure 3

Consensus SummaryHigh supportDefinition Scope

Thermoelectric performance is governed by coupled S, sigma and kappa terms, so optimising one variable in isolation is insufficient.

Evidence basis: review_reasoning

Caveat: The review gives the standard ZT equation but does not resolve material-specific decoupling strategies quantitatively.

877 · Introduction · Equations 1-2

Secondary benchmarks

Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.

MaterialPropertyReported valueContext and qualityPrimary evidenceReview source
SecondaryBi0.5Sb1.5Te3ZT1.2p-type selected material benchmark in Table I; temperature not specified in table
Table · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
SecondaryBi2Te2.7Se0.3ZT0.7n-type selected material benchmark in Table I; temperature not specified in table
Table · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
SecondaryCu3(BTC)2calculated lattice thermal conductivity0.58Molecular-dynamics calculation for uninfiltrated crystalline MOF
Text · Exact Reported
research_0450879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric
SecondaryMOF-5intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity0.3Calculated intrinsic kappal
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping880 · Thermal transport in MOFs
SecondaryMOF-5characteristic vibrational length scale0.83Calculated characteristic length scale compared with 2.6 nm lattice constant
Text · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping880 · Thermal transport in MOFs
SecondaryMOF-74energy carried by short-mean-free-path phonons>50% with l < 2 nmFirst-principles calculation described for MOF-74
Text · Approximate
No verified corpus mapping880 · Thermal transport in MOFs
SecondaryPEDOT:PSSpower factor480p-type conducting polymer benchmark in Table I
Table · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
SecondaryPEDOT:PSSZT0.42p-type conducting polymer benchmark in Table I
Table · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
SecondaryPoly(Cux[Cu-ett])power factor25p-type coordination polymer benchmark in Table I
Table · Exact Reported
No verified corpus mapping878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
SecondaryPoly(Kx[Ni-ett])ZT0.1n-type coordination polymer benchmark at room temperature as described in review text
Table · Exact Reported
research_0296878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2thermal conductivity0.27 +/- 0.04Room-temperature TDTR measurement
Text · Exact Reported
research_0450879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric
SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2calculated lattice thermal conductivity3.84 +/- 0.27Molecular-dynamics calculation for infiltrated crystalline MOF
Text · Exact Reported
research_0450879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric
SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2power factor~0.06Table I/text comparison
Text · Approximate
research_0450879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Table I; Figure 2f
SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2Seebeck coefficient~400Near room temperature; positive voltage measured across thermal gradient
Text · Approximate
research_0450879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 2c-d
SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2electrical conductivity0.45Table I and text; review later inserts sigma = 0.45 S/m into ZT equation
Table · Exact Reported
research_0450880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Table I; Figure 2e
SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2ZT~7 x 10^-5298 K, using measured S, sigma = 0.45 S/m and kappa in Equation 1
Text · Approximate
research_0450880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric
SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2conductivity increase on infiltrationfrom <10^-9 S/m to ~0.1 S/mCu3(BTC)2 infiltrated with TCNQ
Text · Range
research_0088879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric

Research gaps

Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.

Porosity versus electrical conductivity

High

The review cautions that increasing MOF porosity may lower heat transport but harm electrical conductivity and ZT.

Proposed direction: Design porous frameworks that scatter phonons while preserving connected electronic pathways and crystallinity.

881 · Thermal transport in MOFs

Predictive guest engineering

Medium

Guest molecules can stiffen bonds or create rattling-like scattering, so their net effect on kappa and sigma needs predictive control.

Proposed direction: Engineer guest mass, binding, electron affinity and bond heterogeneity to reduce heat-carrying phonons while improving charge transport.

881 · Thermal transport in MOFs

Comparability of thermoelectric measurements

Medium

The review flags that interpretation of a high PEDOT:PSS PF was confounded because sigma and kappa were not measured on the same specimens or geometry.

Proposed direction: Use consistent specimen geometry and co-located measurement protocols when comparing TE benchmarks across polymers and MOFs.

878 · Thermoelectric materials

Limited MOF thermoelectric material set

High

At the time of the review, only one MOF system had been explored for thermoelectric applications.

Proposed direction: Evaluate additional inherently conducting porous frameworks and guest-infiltrated MOFs for TE transport.

879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics

Processability of high-performing n-type coordination polymers

Medium

The review notes that a solution-based processing route to Poly(Kx[Ni-ett]) had not been demonstrated.

Proposed direction: Develop scalable solution processing for n-type coordination polymer thermoelectrics or translate their electronic-structure advantages into MOFs.

878 · Thermoelectric materials

Stable n-type organic conductors

High

The review identifies stable high-performance n-type organic semiconductors as a long-standing challenge.

Proposed direction: Use MOF/Guest@MOF tunability to design electron-transporting materials with suitable orbital alignment and stability.

877 · Abstract

Low electrical conductivity in TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2

High

Despite high Seebeck coefficient and low kappa, TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 has insufficient sigma and a low power factor.

Proposed direction: Increase framework crystallinity and conduction pathways while monitoring whether kappa rises in parallel.

880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 2

Cited-study map

Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.

Show 36 cited-study records
ReferenceStudyRole and contextCorpus mapping
Ref. 12005Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nanodefinition · thermoelectric_contextUsed for basic Seebeck coefficient context and broad thermoelectric definitions.Unmapped
Ref. 22008Title unavailablethermoelectric_mechanism · seebeck_contextCited for the Mott expression and the connection between density-of-states variation near EF and large Seebeck coefficient.Unmapped
Ref. 32015Title unavailablethermal_transport · conducting_polymerCited for the relationship between increasing carrier concentration/mobility and increasing electronic thermal conductivity in conducting polymers.Unmapped
Ref. 42015Title unavailablethermal_transport · organic_semiconductorCited for polymer thermal conductivity trends and for Figure 3 comparison of weak temperature dependence.Unmapped
Ref. 52014Title unavailabletransport_benchmark · coordination_polymerOriginal source for the Poly(Cux[Cu-ett]) p-type coordination polymer benchmark values in Table I.Unmapped
Ref. 62012Title unavailabletransport_benchmark · n_type_polymerOriginal source for the n-type Poly(Kx[Ni-ett]) benchmark and record-room-temperature-ZT statement.research_0296
Ref. 72008Title unavailabletransport_benchmark · inorganic_comparatorOriginal source for the p-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 benchmark values in Table I.Unmapped
Ref. 82010Title unavailabletransport_benchmark · inorganic_comparatorOriginal source for the n-type Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 benchmark values in Table I.Unmapped
Ref. 92015Title unavailableapplications_context · inorganic_comparatorCited for application context such as solar integration and wearable electronics/sensors powered by body heat.Unmapped
Ref. 102015Title unavailableconducting_polymer · review_contextCited for the recent attention to conducting polymers for thermoelectric applications.Unmapped
Ref. 112014Title unavailableconducting_polymer · review_contextCited as part of the review's background on conducting polymer thermoelectrics.research_0662
Ref. 122015Title unavailableconducting_polymer · review_contextCited as background for conducting polymer TE materials and their advantages.Unmapped
Ref. 142014Title unavailableconducting_polymer · doping_caveatCited for dopant and disorder issues in conducting polymer thermoelectrics.Unmapped
Ref. 152013Title unavailabletransport_benchmark · conducting_polymerOriginal source for the PEDOT:PSS benchmark values in Table I and the high power factor example in the text.Unmapped
Ref. 162014Title unavailablen_type_polymer · organic_semiconductorCited for emerging electron-deficient n-type conjugated polymers and their still-limited power factors.Unmapped
Ref. 172011Title unavailablecoordination_polymer · electronic_structureCited for the electronic structure of coordination polymers being dominated by transition-metal d electrons and ligand interactions.Unmapped
Ref. 181985Title unavailablecoordination_polymer · electronic_structureCited alongside Ref. 17 for coordination polymer electronic-structure background.Unmapped
Ref. 192015Title unavailabletransport_benchmark · guest_mof · thermal_transportPrimary source for the only MOF TE example in the review and for Table I, TDTR thermal conductivity, Seebeck, conductivity, power factor and ZT values.research_0450
Ref. 202014Title unavailableguest_mof · conductivity_tuningCited for TCNQ infiltration increasing Cu3(BTC)2 conductivity and creating the electronic conduction pathway.research_0088
Ref. 212013Title unavailablethin_films · processingCited for Cu3(BTC)2 deposition and inkjet-printed paper/fabric-compatible MOF structures shown in Figure 1.Unmapped
Ref. 222004Title unavailablemeasurement_method · tdtrCited for time-domain thermoreflectance as the method used to determine thermal conductivity for TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2.Unmapped
Ref. 231995CRC Thermoelectrics Handbookphonon_glass_electron_crystal · thermoelectric_contextCited for the phonon-glass/electron-crystal design concept used in the thermal transport section.Unmapped
Ref. 241999Title unavailablethermal_transport · disordered_materialsCited for the idea that ultralow thermal conductivity work has focused on disordered or amorphous phases where conventional phonons are absent.Unmapped
Ref. 302007Title unavailablethermal_transport · mof_benchmarkCited for calculated MOF-5 density, sound speed, intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity and short characteristic length scale.Unmapped
Ref. 312015Title unavailablethermal_transport · mof_benchmarkCited for first-principles calculations showing short-length-scale phonon energy transport in MOF-74.Unmapped
Ref. 321988Title unavailablethermal_transport · amorphous_limitCited for amorphous/glassy thermal transport concepts, Dulong-Petit heat capacity context and strongly damped phonon analogy.Unmapped
Ref. 331998Title unavailablerattlers · thermal_transportCited as prior evidence that heavy loosely bound rattling atoms can reduce lattice thermal conductivity in porous or cage-like materials.Unmapped
Ref. 342006Title unavailablerattlers · thermal_transportCited with other rattler references for guest-induced reductions in lattice thermal conductivity.Unmapped
Ref. 382015Title unavailablerattling_modes · thermal_transportCited for acoustic phonons in MOFs exhibiting rattling-like behaviour and high anharmonicity.Unmapped
Ref. 392014Title unavailablebond_heterogeneity · thermal_transportCited for the concept that bond heterogeneity can increase rattling-like acoustic-mode behaviour and reduce thermal transport.Unmapped
Ref. 412007Title unavailablethermal_transport · mof5_temperature_dependenceCited in Figure 3 for thermal conductivity versus temperature of MOF-5.Unmapped
Ref. 422013Title unavailablethermal_transport · organic_semiconductorCited in Figure 3 for lattice thermal conductivity temperature trends in organic comparator materials.Unmapped
Ref. 432013Title unavailablethermal_transport · organic_semiconductorCited in Figure 3 for polymer thermal conductivity trends.Unmapped
Ref. 442007Title unavailablethermal_transport · inorganic_comparatorCited in Figure 3 for Bi2Te3 thermal conductivity temperature comparison.Unmapped
Ref. 452005Title unavailablethermal_transport · inorganic_comparatorCited in Figure 3 for Bi2Te3-related thermal conductivity comparison.Unmapped
Ref. 462008Title unavailablethermal_transport · conducting_polymerCited in Figure 3 for polymer thermal conductivity temperature comparison.Unmapped