Introduction
877-878Defines the Seebeck effect, figure of merit ZT, power factor and the coupled tradeoffs among S, sigma and kappa.
Relevance: Core · 877 · Introduction · Equation 1
A. Alec Talin, Reese E. Jones, and Patrick E. Hopkins · MRS Bulletin · 2016
Review recent advances and design logic for metal-organic frameworks and Guest@MOFs as thermoelectric materials, focusing on Seebeck coefficient, electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and tunability through metal, ligand, and guest selection.
The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.
Defines the Seebeck effect, figure of merit ZT, power factor and the coupled tradeoffs among S, sigma and kappa.
Relevance: Core · 877 · Introduction · Equation 1
Frames MOFs and Guest@MOFs as crystalline, porous, thermally stable alternatives to polymers whose electronic and thermal transport can be tuned through metal, ligand and guest choice.
Relevance: Core · 879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics
Concludes that MOFs could combine inorganic-like structural order with organic-like tunability and low cost, but TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 remains limited by low electrical conductivity.
Relevance: Core · 881 · Summary
Reviews Cu3(BTC)2 deposition, TCNQ infiltration, measured Seebeck response, conductivity, thermal conductivity, TDTR measurement and the low power factor bottleneck.
Relevance: Core · 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figures 1-2
Compares inorganic Bi2Te3 alloys, conducting polymers and coordination polymers, highlighting cost/processability benefits and n-type organic limitations.
Relevance: Core · 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
Explains low lattice thermal conductivity in MOFs using phonon-glass/electron-crystal reasoning, heterogeneous bonds, soft open structures, guest effects and weak temperature dependence.
Relevance: Core · 880 · Thermal transport in MOFs · Figure 3
Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.
The review uses Seebeck sign and thermoelectric-generator architecture to separate p-type and n-type materials, then identifies stable n-type organic conductors as a key scarcity.
Categories: p-type hole conductors · n-type electron conductors
878 · Thermoelectric materials
The review distinguishes MOFs from broader coordination polymers by long-range crystalline order and pores that can adsorb guest molecules or nanostructures to tune transport.
Categories: nonporous coordination polymers · porous MOFs · guest-infiltrated MOFs
879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics
The thermal-transport section classifies guests by likely effect on kappal, from little impact to rattler-driven reductions or stiffening-driven increases.
Categories: weakly interacting light guests · abundant light guests · heavy loosely bound rattlers · bond-stiffening infiltrants
881 · Thermal transport in MOFs
The article moves from conventional inorganic benchmarks to organic polymers and then to MOFs/Guest@MOFs as a hybrid platform with tunable crystalline porous structure.
Categories: Bi2Te3-based inorganic semiconductors · conducting polymers · coordination polymers · MOFs · Guest@MOFs
878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
The review organises TE performance through ZT = S2sigmaT/kappa and uses this framing to compare polymers, coordination polymers, MOFs and inorganic standards.
Categories: Seebeck coefficient S · Electrical conductivity sigma · Thermal conductivity kappa · Power factor S2sigma · Figure of merit ZT
877 · Introduction · Equation 1
The review separates lattice and electronic thermal conductivity and uses the Wiedemann-Franz relationship to explain why improving carrier transport can increase heat transport.
Categories: lattice thermal conductivity kappal · electronic thermal conductivity kappae
878 · Introduction
Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.
Conventional inorganic semiconductors and alloys used as high-performance TE benchmarks.
Conduction: Low-bandgap semiconductor transport with mature TE performance but limited processability for complex or low-cost large-area substrates.
Representative materials: Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 · Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 · Bi2Te3 and alloys
Nodes / linkers: Bi · Sb · Te · Se · not applicable
878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
Organic conjugated polymers considered for flexible, processable, low-cost thermoelectrics.
Conduction: Transport relies on doped conjugated chains; dopants improve carrier concentration but may introduce disorder and reduce mobility.
Representative materials: PEDOT:PSS · polyacetylene · polyaniline · polypyrrole
Nodes / linkers: not applicable · conjugated polymer backbones · polystyrene sulfonate dopant
878 · Thermoelectric materials
Repeating metal-organic coordination complexes used as p-type and n-type polymeric TE comparators.
Conduction: Electronic structure is dominated by transition-metal d electrons and their interaction with organic ligands rather than only carbon-backbone pi orbitals.
Representative materials: Poly(Cux[Cu-ett]) · Poly(Kx[Ni-ett])
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · K counterion · 1,1,2,2-ethenetetrathiolate
878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
Crystalline porous metal-organic frameworks whose electronic and geometric structure can be tuned by metal, ligand and guest selection.
Conduction: MOF crystallinity may promote mobility while pores allow guest molecules to tune electronic and thermal transport.
Representative materials: Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 · MOF-5 · MOF-74
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Zn and other MOF nodes · benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate · TCNQ guest molecules · porous organic linkers
877 · Abstract
Cu3(BTC)2 framework infiltrated with TCNQ molecules that bridge Cu(II) dimers and create an electronic conduction pathway.
Conduction: TCNQ LUMO levels near the Cu3(BTC)2 valence band shift EF toward the valence band, giving p-type Seebeck response but low conductivity.
Representative materials: TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 · Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ
Nodes / linkers: Cu(II) dimers · benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate · tetracyanoquinodimethane guest
879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1
Open, mechanically soft MOFs whose complex, heterogeneous structures can reduce lattice thermal conductivity.
Conduction: Low-energy propagation velocities, mass/bond heterogeneity and phonon scattering can lower kappal, although porosity and disorder may harm electrical conductivity.
Representative materials: MOF-5 · MOF-74 · Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2
Nodes / linkers: Zn · Cu · mixed MOF metal nodes · porous organic linkers · guest molecules
881 · Thermal transport in MOFs · Figure 3
Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.
The review argues that intentionally reducing vibrational energy-transfer length scales is preferable to introducing atomic disorder that may damage charge transport.
Claimed effects: A viable path to high ZT is to preserve electrical transport while suppressing kappal through nanoscale vibrational mechanisms.
Controlling variables: crystallinity · phonon mean free path · structural disorder · porosity
Representative materials: MOFs · Guest@MOFs
Caveat: Increasing porosity can lower heat transport but is expected to have detrimental effects on electrical conductivity and hence ZT.
880 · Thermal transport in MOFs
The review describes polymer TE optimisation as requiring dopants for conductivity while limiting dopant-induced disorder and insulating volume fraction.
Claimed effects: Precise control is associated with high PEDOT:PSS power factor, but interpretation can be confounded by measurement geometry.
Controlling variables: dopant volume fraction · oxidation state · chain-to-chain coupling · carrier concentration
Representative materials: PEDOT:PSS
Caveat: Dopants can occupy volume, introduce disorder, decrease coupling and depress mobility.
878 · Thermoelectric materials
Guest infiltration is proposed not only for electronic tuning but also for controlling vibrational scattering, bond heterogeneity and rattling-like acoustic modes.
Claimed effects: Heavy loosely bound guests may reduce kappal by localised modes, enhanced anharmonicity and lower group velocities, while other guests may stiffen bonds.
Controlling variables: guest mass · host-guest binding strength · bond heterogeneity · pore loading · anharmonicity
Representative materials: Guest@MOFs · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 · zeolites · skutterudites · clathrates
Caveat: The review explicitly cautions that TCNQ infiltration can increase calculated lattice thermal conductivity through bond stiffening.
881 · Thermal transport in MOFs
TCNQ infiltration into Cu3(BTC)2 is reviewed as a way to bridge Cu(II) dimers, create a conduction pathway and shift electronic states near the Fermi level.
Claimed effects: TCNQ increases conductivity by many orders of magnitude and produces p-type thermopower, but the resulting power factor remains low.
Controlling variables: guest molecule electron affinity · guest loading · pore connectivity · host-guest orbital alignment
Representative materials: TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2
Caveat: The review notes that the low electrical conductivity of TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 is still the main performance limitation.
879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1
MOFs are presented as synthetically versatile systems where metal and ligand selection can tune electronic structure for p-type or n-type ZT.
Claimed effects: Appropriate metal-ligand choices could optimise electronic structure and promote charge mobility without depressing Seebeck coefficient.
Controlling variables: metal node · organic ligand · crystalline order · band alignment
Representative materials: conducting MOFs · Guest@MOFs
Caveat: The field was described as in its infancy, with only TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 explored for TE applications at that time.
879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics
The review identifies solution-based thin-film growth and inkjet printing as routes to pattern MOF layers and contacts on low-cost substrates.
Claimed effects: Inkjet printing is attractive for low-cost TE fabrication because relatively thick patterned layers and collectors can be rapidly deposited on paper or fabrics.
Controlling variables: deposition method · substrate · pattern geometry · current collector deposition
Representative materials: Cu3(BTC)2 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2
Caveat: Device-relevant conductivity still depends on framework crystallinity and guest infiltration quality.
879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1b
These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.
Coordination polymers offer an alternative to all-organic polymers because transition-metal d electrons and ligand interactions dominate their electronic structure.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The high-performing n-type poly(Kx[Ni-ett]) lacks a demonstrated solution-based processing route according to the review.
878 · Thermoelectric materials
As of the review, MOF thermoelectrics were at an early stage, with TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 the only MOF explored for TE applications.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: This statement is time-bound to the 2016 review and should not be treated as current beyond that date.
879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics
Guest molecules can either reduce or increase lattice thermal conductivity, so guest infiltration is not automatically beneficial for ZT.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review contrasts rattler-like reduction mechanisms with TCNQ-related bond stiffening in calculated crystalline MOF models.
881 · Thermal transport in MOFs
Bi2Te3-family inorganic semiconductors remain efficient benchmark materials, but their cost, toxicity and poor compatibility with complex large-area structures motivate alternatives.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review emphasises niche and near-ambient applications rather than all TE deployment contexts.
878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I
Electrical conductivity and electronic thermal conductivity are linked, so increasing carrier transport can also increase kappae.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The claim is most relevant where electronic heat conduction becomes non-negligible; low-carrier semiconductors are lattice-conductivity dominated.
878 · Introduction
MOF lattice thermal conductivity can be low because mass and bond-stiffness heterogeneity, open soft structures and short vibrational energy-transfer lengths reduce phonon transport.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review warns that increasing porosity can harm electrical conductivity and ZT.
880 · Thermal transport in MOFs
The review's outlook is that conductive porous frameworks and Guest@MOFs are promising for thermoelectric applications if conductivity and guest-tuned transport can be improved.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The review explicitly states that TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 is still too low in sigma to be an attractive thermoelectric.
881 · Summary
MOFs could overcome polymer disorder while retaining low cost and tunability because long-range crystalline order may increase charge mobility and pores allow guest-based tuning.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The article presents this as a promising design rationale rather than a demonstrated high-ZT MOF result.
879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics
Stable high-performance n-type organic semiconductors are scarce because many conjugated polymers have LUMO levels that are too high relative to vacuum.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The review notes newer electron-deficient systems but reports power factors below leading p-type polymer values.
878 · Thermoelectric materials
Conducting polymers are attractive for low-cost flexible TEs, but their dopants can introduce insulating volume, structural disorder and lower chain-to-chain coupling.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: This is a broad review generalisation over conducting polymers and does not replace primary morphology or doping data.
878 · Thermoelectric materials
Large Seebeck coefficients often occur in lightly doped semiconductors with rapidly varying density of states near EF, but low carrier concentration can limit conductivity and ZT.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The statement is a review-level use of the Mott expression, not a MOF-specific measurement.
877 · Introduction · Equation 2
TCNQ infiltration is interpreted as moving EF from mid-gap toward the Cu3(BTC)2 valence band because TCNQ LUMO levels lie close to the host valence band.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The claim relies on calculated density of states shown in the review's Figure 1 rather than a direct transport-only measurement.
879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 1c-d
TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 has a large Seebeck coefficient and low thermal conductivity, but its low electrical conductivity dominates the low power factor and low ZT.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The review suggests improving crystallinity may raise sigma but may also increase kappa.
880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 2
Typical semiconducting organic materials, Bi2Te3 and MOF-5 are presented as showing only slight increases in kappa with temperature, resembling glassy or amorphous materials rather than conventional T-1 crystalline behaviour.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: This is a review-level comparison from Figure 3 across different studies and material types.
881 · Thermal transport in MOFs · Figure 3
Thermoelectric performance is governed by coupled S, sigma and kappa terms, so optimising one variable in isolation is insufficient.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The review gives the standard ZT equation but does not resolve material-specific decoupling strategies quantitatively.
877 · Introduction · Equations 1-2
Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.
| Material | Property | Reported value | Context and quality | Primary evidence | Review source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SecondaryBi0.5Sb1.5Te3 | ZT | 1.2 | p-type selected material benchmark in Table I; temperature not specified in table Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I |
| SecondaryBi2Te2.7Se0.3 | ZT | 0.7 | n-type selected material benchmark in Table I; temperature not specified in table Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I |
| SecondaryCu3(BTC)2 | calculated lattice thermal conductivity | 0.58 | Molecular-dynamics calculation for uninfiltrated crystalline MOF Text · Exact Reported | research_0450 | 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric |
| SecondaryMOF-5 | intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity | 0.3 | Calculated intrinsic kappal Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 880 · Thermal transport in MOFs |
| SecondaryMOF-5 | characteristic vibrational length scale | 0.83 | Calculated characteristic length scale compared with 2.6 nm lattice constant Text · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 880 · Thermal transport in MOFs |
| SecondaryMOF-74 | energy carried by short-mean-free-path phonons | >50% with l < 2 nm | First-principles calculation described for MOF-74 Text · Approximate | No verified corpus mapping | 880 · Thermal transport in MOFs |
| SecondaryPEDOT:PSS | power factor | 480 | p-type conducting polymer benchmark in Table I Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I |
| SecondaryPEDOT:PSS | ZT | 0.42 | p-type conducting polymer benchmark in Table I Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I |
| SecondaryPoly(Cux[Cu-ett]) | power factor | 25 | p-type coordination polymer benchmark in Table I Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I |
| SecondaryPoly(Kx[Ni-ett]) | ZT | 0.1 | n-type coordination polymer benchmark at room temperature as described in review text Table · Exact Reported | research_0296 | 878 · Thermoelectric materials · Table I |
| SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 | thermal conductivity | 0.27 +/- 0.04 | Room-temperature TDTR measurement Text · Exact Reported | research_0450 | 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric |
| SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 | calculated lattice thermal conductivity | 3.84 +/- 0.27 | Molecular-dynamics calculation for infiltrated crystalline MOF Text · Exact Reported | research_0450 | 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric |
| SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 | power factor | ~0.06 | Table I/text comparison Text · Approximate | research_0450 | 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Table I; Figure 2f |
| SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 | Seebeck coefficient | ~400 | Near room temperature; positive voltage measured across thermal gradient Text · Approximate | research_0450 | 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 2c-d |
| SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 | electrical conductivity | 0.45 | Table I and text; review later inserts sigma = 0.45 S/m into ZT equation Table · Exact Reported | research_0450 | 880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Table I; Figure 2e |
| SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 | ZT | ~7 x 10^-5 | 298 K, using measured S, sigma = 0.45 S/m and kappa in Equation 1 Text · Approximate | research_0450 | 880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric |
| SecondaryTCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 | conductivity increase on infiltration | from <10^-9 S/m to ~0.1 S/m | Cu3(BTC)2 infiltrated with TCNQ Text · Range | research_0088 | 879 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric |
Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.
The review cautions that increasing MOF porosity may lower heat transport but harm electrical conductivity and ZT.
Proposed direction: Design porous frameworks that scatter phonons while preserving connected electronic pathways and crystallinity.
881 · Thermal transport in MOFs
Guest molecules can stiffen bonds or create rattling-like scattering, so their net effect on kappa and sigma needs predictive control.
Proposed direction: Engineer guest mass, binding, electron affinity and bond heterogeneity to reduce heat-carrying phonons while improving charge transport.
881 · Thermal transport in MOFs
The review flags that interpretation of a high PEDOT:PSS PF was confounded because sigma and kappa were not measured on the same specimens or geometry.
Proposed direction: Use consistent specimen geometry and co-located measurement protocols when comparing TE benchmarks across polymers and MOFs.
878 · Thermoelectric materials
At the time of the review, only one MOF system had been explored for thermoelectric applications.
Proposed direction: Evaluate additional inherently conducting porous frameworks and guest-infiltrated MOFs for TE transport.
879 · Conducting metal-organic frameworks as thermoelectrics
The review notes that a solution-based processing route to Poly(Kx[Ni-ett]) had not been demonstrated.
Proposed direction: Develop scalable solution processing for n-type coordination polymer thermoelectrics or translate their electronic-structure advantages into MOFs.
878 · Thermoelectric materials
The review identifies stable high-performance n-type organic semiconductors as a long-standing challenge.
Proposed direction: Use MOF/Guest@MOF tunability to design electron-transporting materials with suitable orbital alignment and stability.
877 · Abstract
Despite high Seebeck coefficient and low kappa, TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 has insufficient sigma and a low power factor.
Proposed direction: Increase framework crystallinity and conduction pathways while monitoring whether kappa rises in parallel.
880 · TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 thermoelectric · Figure 2
Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.
| Reference | Study | Role and context | Corpus mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. 12005 | Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano | definition · thermoelectric_contextUsed for basic Seebeck coefficient context and broad thermoelectric definitions. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 22008 | Title unavailable | thermoelectric_mechanism · seebeck_contextCited for the Mott expression and the connection between density-of-states variation near EF and large Seebeck coefficient. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 32015 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · conducting_polymerCited for the relationship between increasing carrier concentration/mobility and increasing electronic thermal conductivity in conducting polymers. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 42015 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · organic_semiconductorCited for polymer thermal conductivity trends and for Figure 3 comparison of weak temperature dependence. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 52014 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmark · coordination_polymerOriginal source for the Poly(Cux[Cu-ett]) p-type coordination polymer benchmark values in Table I. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 62012 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmark · n_type_polymerOriginal source for the n-type Poly(Kx[Ni-ett]) benchmark and record-room-temperature-ZT statement. | research_0296 |
| Ref. 72008 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmark · inorganic_comparatorOriginal source for the p-type Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 benchmark values in Table I. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 82010 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmark · inorganic_comparatorOriginal source for the n-type Bi2Te2.7Se0.3 benchmark values in Table I. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 92015 | Title unavailable | applications_context · inorganic_comparatorCited for application context such as solar integration and wearable electronics/sensors powered by body heat. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 102015 | Title unavailable | conducting_polymer · review_contextCited for the recent attention to conducting polymers for thermoelectric applications. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 112014 | Title unavailable | conducting_polymer · review_contextCited as part of the review's background on conducting polymer thermoelectrics. | research_0662 |
| Ref. 122015 | Title unavailable | conducting_polymer · review_contextCited as background for conducting polymer TE materials and their advantages. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 142014 | Title unavailable | conducting_polymer · doping_caveatCited for dopant and disorder issues in conducting polymer thermoelectrics. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 152013 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmark · conducting_polymerOriginal source for the PEDOT:PSS benchmark values in Table I and the high power factor example in the text. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 162014 | Title unavailable | n_type_polymer · organic_semiconductorCited for emerging electron-deficient n-type conjugated polymers and their still-limited power factors. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 172011 | Title unavailable | coordination_polymer · electronic_structureCited for the electronic structure of coordination polymers being dominated by transition-metal d electrons and ligand interactions. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 181985 | Title unavailable | coordination_polymer · electronic_structureCited alongside Ref. 17 for coordination polymer electronic-structure background. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 192015 | Title unavailable | transport_benchmark · guest_mof · thermal_transportPrimary source for the only MOF TE example in the review and for Table I, TDTR thermal conductivity, Seebeck, conductivity, power factor and ZT values. | research_0450 |
| Ref. 202014 | Title unavailable | guest_mof · conductivity_tuningCited for TCNQ infiltration increasing Cu3(BTC)2 conductivity and creating the electronic conduction pathway. | research_0088 |
| Ref. 212013 | Title unavailable | thin_films · processingCited for Cu3(BTC)2 deposition and inkjet-printed paper/fabric-compatible MOF structures shown in Figure 1. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 222004 | Title unavailable | measurement_method · tdtrCited for time-domain thermoreflectance as the method used to determine thermal conductivity for TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 231995 | CRC Thermoelectrics Handbook | phonon_glass_electron_crystal · thermoelectric_contextCited for the phonon-glass/electron-crystal design concept used in the thermal transport section. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 241999 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · disordered_materialsCited for the idea that ultralow thermal conductivity work has focused on disordered or amorphous phases where conventional phonons are absent. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 302007 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · mof_benchmarkCited for calculated MOF-5 density, sound speed, intrinsic lattice thermal conductivity and short characteristic length scale. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 312015 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · mof_benchmarkCited for first-principles calculations showing short-length-scale phonon energy transport in MOF-74. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 321988 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · amorphous_limitCited for amorphous/glassy thermal transport concepts, Dulong-Petit heat capacity context and strongly damped phonon analogy. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 331998 | Title unavailable | rattlers · thermal_transportCited as prior evidence that heavy loosely bound rattling atoms can reduce lattice thermal conductivity in porous or cage-like materials. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 342006 | Title unavailable | rattlers · thermal_transportCited with other rattler references for guest-induced reductions in lattice thermal conductivity. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 382015 | Title unavailable | rattling_modes · thermal_transportCited for acoustic phonons in MOFs exhibiting rattling-like behaviour and high anharmonicity. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 392014 | Title unavailable | bond_heterogeneity · thermal_transportCited for the concept that bond heterogeneity can increase rattling-like acoustic-mode behaviour and reduce thermal transport. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 412007 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · mof5_temperature_dependenceCited in Figure 3 for thermal conductivity versus temperature of MOF-5. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 422013 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · organic_semiconductorCited in Figure 3 for lattice thermal conductivity temperature trends in organic comparator materials. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 432013 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · organic_semiconductorCited in Figure 3 for polymer thermal conductivity trends. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 442007 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · inorganic_comparatorCited in Figure 3 for Bi2Te3 thermal conductivity temperature comparison. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 452005 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · inorganic_comparatorCited in Figure 3 for Bi2Te3-related thermal conductivity comparison. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 462008 | Title unavailable | thermal_transport · conducting_polymerCited in Figure 3 for polymer thermal conductivity temperature comparison. | Unmapped |