Diffraction Structure — A comparative study of honeycomb-like 2D π-conjugated metal-organic framework chemiresistors: conductivity and channels

Measurement evidence

Diffraction Structure

A comparative study of honeycomb-like 2D π-conjugated metal-organic framework chemiresistors: conductivity and channels · Yao M.-S., Wang P., Gu Y.-F. et al. · Dalton Transactions · 2021 · 13236-13245

2 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

GIWAXS

Cu-HHTP NR thick-film chemiresistor · Electrode

Synchrotron GIWAXS collected at SPring-8 beamline 46XU, lambda = 1.0000 A, on thick-film chemiresistive gas sensors after activation and ageing.

Geometry
thick film on electrode substrate
Context
pristine Cu-HHTP cMOF film on device substrate
Measurement source
p005; article page 13239 · Results and discussion · Fig. 5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Cu-HHTP film integrity after activation and ageingGIWAXS patterns similar to as-prepared powdersQualitative
Qualitative
p005; article page 13239 · Results and discussion · Fig. 5

PXRD

Cu-HITP powders · Powder

Powder X-ray diffraction recorded at SPring-8 beamline 02B2 (lambda = 0.79962 A) and/or Rigaku Smartlab with Cu Kalpha radiation (lambda = 1.54178 A).

Context
pristine framework powders; Fig. 2 compares all cMOFs
Measurement source
p004 and p009; article pages 13238 and 13243 · Results and discussion; Characterization · Fig. 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Cu-HHTP/Cu-HITP (100) PXRD peak position2theta = about 4.8 degText
Approximate
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-HHTP/Cu-HITP hexagonal a-axis rangea = 2.18-2.23 nmText
Range
p003; article page 13237 · Results and discussion
Cu-HHTP/Cu-HITP hexagonal c-axis rangec = 0.660-0.666 nmText
Range
p003; article page 13237 · Results and discussion
Cu-HHTP-THQ PXRD peak position2theta = about 5.9 degText
Approximate
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-HHTP-THQ activated powder a-axisa = 1.71 nmText
Exact Reported
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-HHTP-THQ activated powder c-axisc = 0.627 nmText
Exact Reported
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-THQ (110)/(020) PXRD peak position2theta = about 7.9 degText
Approximate
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-THQ orthorhombic a-axisa = 1.31 nmText
Exact Reported
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-THQ orthorhombic b-axisb = 2.16 nmText
Exact Reported
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-THQ orthorhombic c-axisc = 0.59 nmText
Exact Reported
p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2
Cu-HITP framework after NO2 exposurecrystalline framework maintained; no secondary phase observedText
Qualitative
p005; article page 13239 · Results and discussion · Fig. S2