Yao M.-S., Wang P., Gu Y.-F. et al. · Dalton Transactions · 2021 · 13236-13245
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
H2en2+ counterions in THQ-containing cMOFs narrow channels and reduce accessible N2 porosity, most strongly in Cu-THQ.
Caveat: Counterion occupancy is described structurally; direct guest occupancy quantification beyond the framework charge argument is not provided here.
p005; article page 13239 · Results and discussion · Fig. 4 · Linked to 3 structured results
Cu-HHTP nanosheets respond/recover faster than nanorods because shorter c-axis diffusion paths reduce 1D-channel gas diffusion limitations.
Caveat: No direct diffusion coefficient is reported; interpretation is based on morphology and response-recovery curves.
p007-p008; article pages 13241-13242 · Results and discussion; Conclusions · Fig. 7a · Linked to 1 structured result
Overall meso- and microporosity, rather than only honeycomb pore size, controls response-recovery speed.
Caveat: Porosity-speed link is inferred from BJH/HK distributions and response curves, not from direct gas diffusivity measurements.
p007; article page 13241 · Results and discussion · Fig. 7 · Linked to 3 structured results
Cu-HITP with CuN4 nodes shows both p-type responses to reducing gases and n-type response to NO2.
Caveat: Authors state that the NO2 charge-transfer mechanism remains challenging and needs further work.
p005; article page 13239 · Results and discussion · Fig. 6a · Linked to 4 structured results
Lower-conductivity CuO4-node cMOFs produce higher relative NH3 chemiresistive responses, with Cu-THQ giving the largest response.
Caveat: Conductivity values are mostly compiled from literature rather than newly measured in this paper; sensor recovery for Cu-THQ is limited at 100 ppm.
p006-p007; article pages 13240-13241 · Results and discussion; Conclusions · Fig. 6c · Linked to 5 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-HHTPBrowse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTP | Cu3(HHTP)2CuO4 square-planar nodes · HHTP (2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene; source text writes hexahydrotriphenylene) | 2D · PristineHoneycomb-like 2D pi-conjugated cMOF; hexagonal P6/mmm-type lattice; AB slipped-parallel stacking. | p003; article page 13237 · Results and discussion · Fig. 1 |
| Cu-HHTP-THQBrowse family: Cu₃(HHTP)(THQ) / Cu–HHTP–THQ | Cu3(HHTP)(THQ)CuO4 square-planar nodes with H2en2+ counterions · HHTP and THQ (tetrahydroxy-1,4-quinone) | 2D · PristineDual-ligand honeycomb-like 2D pi-conjugated cMOF; trigonal P3m1; AB slipped-parallel stacking with counterions occupying channels. | p003; article page 13237 · Results and discussion · Fig. 1 |
| Cu-HITPBrowse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITP | Cu3(HITP)2 / Cu3(HATP-derived)2, as reported in comparative cMOF literatureCuN4 square-planar nodes · hexaaminotriphenylene-derived HITP/HATP ligand | 2D · PristineHoneycomb-like 2D pi-conjugated cMOF; hexagonal P6/mmm-type unit cell discussed with Cu-HHTP; neutral framework without channel counterions after activation. | p003; article page 13237 · Results and discussion · Fig. 1 |
| Cu-THQBrowse family: Cu₃(C₆O₆)₂ (Cu–THQ / Cu–HHB) | Cu-THQ framework with square-planar CuO4 centres and H2en2+ counterionsCuO4 square-planar nodes with net negative framework charge · THQ (tetrahydroxy-1,4-quinone) | 2D · PristineHoneycomb-like 2D pi-conjugated cMOF; C-centred orthorhombic unit cell; AB slipped-parallel stacking. | p004; article page 13238 · Results and discussion · Fig. 2 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-HHTP individual microcrystal conductivity comparison sampleresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Single Crystal · Paper Level Unspecified · Pristine Framework | comparative literature value tabulated by this paper | p006; article page 13240 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| Cu-HHTP nanorods (NRs)research_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | washed with water and methanol, dried under vacuum at 80 deg C for 12 h | p008; article page 13242 · Preparation of Cu-HHTP NRs |
| Cu-HHTP NR thick-film chemiresistorresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | methanol suspension drop-coated, activated and aged at 5 V in flowing dry air at 65 deg C for 3 hAl2O3 substrate with precoated Ag-Pd interdigital electrodes · thick film; thickness not reported | p005; article page 13239 · Results and discussion · Fig. 5 |
| Cu-HHTP nanosheets (NSs)research_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Nanosheet · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | washed with water and methanol, dried under vacuum at 80 deg C for 12 h | p008; article page 13242 · Preparation of Cu-HHTP NSs |
| Cu-HHTP NS thick-film chemiresistorresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | methanol suspension drop-coated, activated and aged at 5 V in flowing dry air at 65 deg C for 3 hAl2O3 substrate with precoated Ag-Pd interdigital electrodes · thick film; thickness not reported | p007; article page 13241 · Results and discussion · Fig. 7 |
| Cu-HHTP pellet conductivity comparison sampleresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Pellet · Paper Level Unspecified · Pristine Framework | comparative literature value tabulated by this paper | p006; article page 13240 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| Cu3(HHTP)(THQ) nanowiresresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp_thq | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | aqueous nanowire fraction collected, aged at 60 deg C, filtered, washed and dried under vacuum at 65 deg C overnight | p008; article page 13242 · Fabrication of Cu-HHTP-THQ nanowires |
| Cu-HHTP-THQ pellet conductivity comparison sampleresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp_thq | Pellet · Paper Level Unspecified · Guest Loaded | comparative literature value tabulated by this paper | p006; article page 13240 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| Cu-HHTP-THQ thick-film chemiresistorresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hhtp_thq | Electrode · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | methanol suspension drop-coated, activated and aged at 5 V in flowing dry air at 65 deg C for 3 hAl2O3 substrate with precoated Ag-Pd interdigital electrodes · thick film; thickness not reported | p006; article page 13240 · Results and discussion · Fig. 6b |
| Cu-HITP pellet conductivity comparison sampleresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hitp | Pellet · Paper Level Unspecified · Pristine Framework | comparative literature value tabulated by this paper | p006; article page 13240 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| Cu-HITP powdersresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hitp | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | as-synthesised powder dried under vacuum at 65 deg C overnight | p008; article page 13242 · Preparation of Cu-HITP powders |
| Cu-HITP thick-film chemiresistorresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_hitp | Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | methanol suspension drop-coated, activated and aged at 5 V in flowing dry air at 65 deg C for 3 hAl2O3 substrate with precoated Ag-Pd interdigital electrodes · thick film; thickness not reported | p009; article page 13243 · Gas sensor characterization |
| Cu-THQ nanoplatesresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_thq | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | nanoplates collected from upper solution, aged at 60 deg C, filtered, washed and dried under vacuum at 65 deg C overnight | p008-p009; article pages 13242-13243 · Preparation of Cu-THQ |
| Cu-THQ pellet conductivity comparison sampleresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_thq | Pellet · Paper Level Unspecified · Guest Loaded | comparative literature value tabulated by this paper | p006; article page 13240 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| Cu-THQ thick-film chemiresistorresearch_0128__mat__mat_cu_thq | Electrode · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | methanol suspension drop-coated, activated and aged at 5 V in flowing dry air at 65 deg C for 3 hAl2O3 substrate with precoated Ag-Pd interdigital electrodes · thick film; thickness not reported | p006; article page 13240 · Results and discussion · Fig. 6b and Table 2 |