This family merges chemical shorthand and formula variants only after verification against source articles. Per-paper composition and phase details remain separate below.
Paper counts are material-linked through samples and measurements; technique groups are not value rankings.
Distinct primary papers in this browse group by publication year.
Filter the material-linked paper set while keeping every result in its original dossier.
28 papers
Le K.T.M., Nguyen C.M., Jamali S. et al. · Advanced Materials Technologies · 2026
Reported here: MBS/aptamer-functionalised CuHITP sensing interface · powder CuHITP control · vertically aligned CuHITP/Cu(OH)2 heterostructure film
Lister A.M., Wang Y., Armitage B.I. et al. · JPhys Materials · 2025
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
Cheng S., Zhou Q., Sheng D. et al. · Advanced Science · 2025
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
Wang W., Chen B., Guo J. et al. · Advanced Functional Materials · 2025
Reported here: Cu-N4 Cu3(HITP)2 DFT surface model · Cu3(HITP)2 conjugated coordination polymer
Wang Y., Wang J., Zeng J. et al. · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · 2025
Reported here: Cu-HITP
Liu M., Zhao J., Dong H. et al. · Small · 2024
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 conductive MOF film
Jo Y.-M., Kim D.-H., Wang J. et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
Reported here: Cu3HITP2
Debela T.T., Hendon C.H. · ACS Materials Letters · 2024
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 with hydrogen vacancy (VH) · Cu3(HITP)2 with single interstitial hydrogen (Hi) · Cu3(HITP)2 with two neutral interstitial hydrogens (2Hi) · Monolayer Cu3(HITP)2
Park C., Shin H., Jeon M. et al. · ACS Nano · 2024
Reported here: Ag1-cMOF · cMOF / Cu3(HITP)2 · Ir1-cMOF · Pd-NP@cMOF · Pd1-cMOF
Zhang M.-C., Liu M.-Y., Yang M.-X. et al. · Journal of Solid State Chemistry · 2023
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
Shin S.-J., Gittins J.W., Golomb M.J. et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
Zhang J.-L., Gao S., Yang Y. et al. · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · 2023
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 · Ru@Cu3(HITP)2
Bhauriyal P., Heine T. · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · 2022
Reported here: Cu3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)2
Sun X., Li Y., Su H. et al. · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · 2022
Reported here: Cu-HITP conductive MOF
Mu J., Zhong X., Dai W. et al. · Molecules · 2022
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 · PDMS-PCDA/Cu3(HITP)2 nanofibre arrays
Miao M., Wang Z., Guo Z. et al. · Advanced Materials Interfaces · 2022
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 metal-organic framework · Cu3(HITP)2 MOF at PS template intermediate · Raw-Cu3(HITP)2 film without TOM structure · TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 film
Mariano R.G., Wahab O.J., Rabinowitz J.A. et al. · ACS Central Science · 2022
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
Yao M.-S., Wang P., Gu Y.-F. et al. · Dalton Transactions · 2021
Reported here: Cu-HITP
Wu A.-Q., Wang W.-Q., Zhan H.-B. et al. · Nano Research · 2021
Reported here: Cu-HITP / Cu3(HITP)2
Sun H., Chen L., Xiong L. et al. · Nature Communications · 2021
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 · KB@Cu3(HITP)2
Nazir A., Le H.T.T., Kasbe A. et al. · Chemical Engineering Journal · 2021
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 conductive Cu-MOF · Si nanoparticles coated with Cu3(HITP)2 · Si@Cu3(HITP)2-5/LiCoO2 full cell
Wang J., Li F., Liu Z. et al. · ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces · 2021
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
Chen T., Dou J.-H., Yang L. et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
Zhang C., Chen Z., Lian Y. et al. · Wuli Huaxue Xuebao/ Acta Physico - Chimica Sinica · 2019
Reported here: Cu3HITP2 · Cu3HITP2/CF
Yang L., He X., Dinca M. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2019
Reported here: copper hexaiminotriphenylene (Cu3HITP2)
Miner E.M., Wang L., Dinca M. · Chemical Science · 2018
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 hexagonal MOF
Campbell M.G., Liu S.F., Swager T.M. et al. · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2015
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2 (MOF 2)
Campbell M.G., Sheberla D., Liu S.F. et al. · Angewandte Chemie - International Edition · 2015
Reported here: Cu3(HITP)2
No linked paper matches these filters.
Raw names, formulas and structural assignments remain separate; no consensus value is inferred.
| Paper and reported name | Formula and components | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| MBS/aptamer-functionalised CuHITP sensing interface2026 · Sub-Femtomolar, Label-Free Small-Molecule Sensing with Nanoarchitectonic Metal-Organic Frameworks | CuHITP/Cu(OH)2-MBS-DNA aptamerCuHITP conductive MOF nodes with MBS-linked thiolated DNA aptamer · HITP framework plus MBS crosslinker and thiolated cortisol or scrambled DNA aptamer | 2D · CompositeCovalently biofunctionalised conductive-MOF heterostructure surface for EG-FET sensing. | 7 · 2.3.1 Formation of Functional Groups · Figure 5a |
| powder CuHITP control2026 · Sub-Femtomolar, Label-Free Small-Molecule Sensing with Nanoarchitectonic Metal-Organic Frameworks | CuHITPCu coordinated to imine/amine N sites of HITP · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineControl CuHITP powder synthesised by a conventional solvothermal method and compared by XRD. | 3 · Figure 2 caption · Figure 2c |
| vertically aligned CuHITP/Cu(OH)2 heterostructure film2026 · Sub-Femtomolar, Label-Free Small-Molecule Sensing with Nanoarchitectonic Metal-Organic Frameworks | CuHITP on residual Cu(OH)2Cu2+ coordinated to N atoms in CuHITP; residual Cu(OH)2 core · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene, formed from HATP.6HCl precursor | 2D · CompositePartially converted, vertically aligned 2D conductive CuHITP outer layer on residual Cu(OH)2 nanoarray scaffold; XRD contains both Cu(OH)2 and CuHITP peaks. | 4 · 2.1 Material Characterization · Figure 2c |
| Cu-HITP2025 · Micro-sized conductive metal–organic framework nanosheets for the electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction in acidic media | Cu-HITP (copper HITP framework)Cu · HITP | 2D · PristineCrystalline HITP-based MOF nanoparticle/aggregate; included in M-HITP screening. | p002 / 42274 · Results and discussion · Fig. S1-S4 |
| Cu-N4 Cu3(HITP)2 DFT surface model2025 · Fabrication of a Novel Cu Based Conjugated Coordination Polymer for Effective Electroreduction of Nitrate to Ammonia and Zn–Nitrate Batteries | Cu3(HITP)2 surface modelCu-N4 active site in a periodic Cu3(HITP)2 surface. · HITP-derived conjugated ligand in the model surface. | 2D · Model SystemDFT model used for NO3 adsorption, PDOS, d-band centre, Gibbs free-energy profiles and hydrogen adsorption. | 7-8 · Results and Discussions · Figure 5 |
| Cu3(HITP)22025 · Cu─X Bonds Regulated Conduction and Polarization Loss in Conductive Metal-Organic Framework Under Electromagnetic Field | Cu3(HITP)2; HITP derived from hexaaminotriphenylene hexahydrochloride (HITP.6HCl)Cu-X4 square-planar units, X = N; mixed Cu(II)/Cu(I) detected · HITP / hexaaminotriphenylene-derived amino triphenylene linker | 2D · PristineIsoreticular hcb topology, layered 2D conductive MOF; Cu-N coordination; slip-parallel stacking with ca. 3.2 A interlayer spacing. | 2 · Section 2.1 · Figure 1a |
| Cu3(HITP)22025 · Conductive metal-organic framework synthesis from metal nanoparticle precursors | Cu3(HITP)2Cu nodes; XPS indicates Cu2+ plus Cu/Cu+ species, with residual metallic Cu cores not ruled out for nanoparticle-derived samples. · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP), formed from HATP.6HCl precursor | 2D · Pristine2D hexagonal sheets that stack in a slipped parallel arrangement to create extended pore channels; PXRD indexed as hexagonal with a = b = 21.7 A and c = 3.2 A for foil-derived powder. | p003 · Introduction · Figure 1 |
| Cu3(HITP)2 conjugated coordination polymer2025 · Fabrication of a Novel Cu Based Conjugated Coordination Polymer for Effective Electroreduction of Nitrate to Ammonia and Zn–Nitrate Batteries | Cu3(HITP)2Atomically dispersed Cu sites coordinated by four N atoms; Cu-N4 coordination. · HITP ligand, introduced as HITP.6HCl in synthesis. | 2D · PristineHexagonal layered conjugated coordination polymer with graphene-like layered stacking stabilised by pi-pi interactions; XRD peaks assigned to (100), (200), (210) and (001) planes. | 2-3 · Results and Discussions · Figures 1-2 |
| Ag1-cMOF2024 · Single-Atom Catalysts in Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks: Enabling Reversible Gas Sensing at Room Temperature | Ag single atoms stabilised on Cu3(HITP)2Cu nodes plus Ag single atoms · HITP | 2D · CompositeSAC-functionalised Cu3(HITP)2; atomic dispersion verified by HAADF-STEM/EDS, XPS Ag(I), and preserved XRD/FT-IR peaks. | rendered page 4 / article p.26069 · Characterization of SACs Stabilized in cMOF · Figures S7-S9 and S15 |
| cMOF / Cu3(HITP)22024 · Single-Atom Catalysts in Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks: Enabling Reversible Gas Sensing at Room Temperature | Cu3(HITP)2; HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenyleneCu nodes / Cu-N4 coordination units · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP) | 2D · PristineTriphenylene-based conductive MOF with densely packed 2D honeycomb layers and approximately 2 nm 1D pore channels; XRD peaks assigned to Cu3(HITP)2 (100), (200), (210), (220), and (001). | rendered page 3 / article p.26068 · Functionalization of SACs in cMOFs |
| Cu3(HITP)2 conductive MOF film2024 · Electrodeposition of Ni/Cu Bimetallic Conductive Metal–Organic Frameworks Electrocatalysts with Boosted Oxygen Reduction Activity for Zinc–Air Batteries | Cu3(HITP)2Cu coordinated to N sites; distorted/asymmetric CuN4 environment discussed by DFT · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP) | 2D · PristineLayered 2D conductive framework with poorer crystallinity/order than Ni-rich analogues. | 2 · 2.1 Material Design and Structural Characterization · Figure 1b |
| Cu3(HITP)2 with hydrogen vacancy (VH)2024 · Hydrogenic Defects in Ferromagnetic Cu3(HITP)2 (HITP ≡ 2,3,6,7,10,11-Hexaiminotriphenylene), a 2D Metal-Organic Framework | Cu3(HITP)2 minus H; charge states q = -1, 0, +1Cu2+ near-square-planar N coordination retained in monolayer model. · HITP linker with one H removed to represent over-deprotonation. | 2D · Model SystemPoint-defect monolayer model derived from honeycomb Cu3(HITP)2. | main p.3, article p.2700 · Results and discussion · Figure 2a-c |
| Cu3(HITP)2 with single interstitial hydrogen (Hi)2024 · Hydrogenic Defects in Ferromagnetic Cu3(HITP)2 (HITP ≡ 2,3,6,7,10,11-Hexaiminotriphenylene), a 2D Metal-Organic Framework | Cu3(HITP)2 plus H; charge states H+, H*, H-Cu2+ near-square-planar N coordination retained in monolayer model. · HITP linker with one added adatomic/interstitial H on N-donor site; charge state controls electron count and ring rearomatisation. | 2D · Model SystemPoint-defect monolayer model derived from honeycomb Cu3(HITP)2. | main p.3, article p.2700 · Results and discussion · Figure 2a-c; Figure 3 |
| Cu3(HITP)2 with two neutral interstitial hydrogens (2Hi)2024 · Hydrogenic Defects in Ferromagnetic Cu3(HITP)2 (HITP ≡ 2,3,6,7,10,11-Hexaiminotriphenylene), a 2D Metal-Organic Framework | Cu3(HITP)2 plus 2H*Cu2+ near-square-planar N coordination retained in monolayer model. · Two HITP linkers each rearomatised by one added neutral H atom. | 2D · Model SystemDefective monolayer model with one neutral H interstitial per linker. | main p.3, article p.2700 · Results and discussion · Figure 2a,d |
| Cu3HITP22024 · Humidity-Mediated Dual Ionic-Electronic Conductivity Enables High Sensitivity in MOF Chemiresistors | Cu3(HITP)2; HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenyleneCu nodes in a triphenylene-based 2D conductive MOF · HITP | 2D · PristineTriphenylene-based cMOF control; PXRD and SEM shown in SI. | p002 / article p.20214 · Results and Discussion · Figures S4 and S5 |
| Ir1-cMOF2024 · Single-Atom Catalysts in Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks: Enabling Reversible Gas Sensing at Room Temperature | Ir single atoms stabilised on Cu3(HITP)2Cu nodes plus Ir single atoms · HITP | 2D · CompositeSAC-functionalised Cu3(HITP)2; atomic dispersion verified by HAADF-STEM/EDS, XPS Ir(III), and preserved XRD/FT-IR peaks. | rendered page 4 / article p.26069 · Characterization of SACs Stabilized in cMOF · Figures S7-S9 |
| Monolayer Cu3(HITP)22024 · Hydrogenic Defects in Ferromagnetic Cu3(HITP)2 (HITP ≡ 2,3,6,7,10,11-Hexaiminotriphenylene), a 2D Metal-Organic Framework | Cu3(HITP)2Cu2+ centres in near-square-planar N coordination; one unpaired d electron per Cu centre. · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene, modelled as linkers having lost 6H+ and 3e- during assembly. | 2D · Model SystemHoneycomb monolayer lattice; slightly buckled 2D sheets; narrow-gap semiconductor in spin-polarised HSEsol calculations. | main p.2, article p.2699 · Results and discussion · Figure 1 |
| Pd-NP@cMOF2024 · Single-Atom Catalysts in Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks: Enabling Reversible Gas Sensing at Room Temperature | approximately 2 nm Pd nanoparticles encapsulated in Cu3(HITP)2Cu nodes plus Pd nanoparticles · HITP | 2D · CompositePd nanoparticle-encapsulated conductive MOF reference with XRD-retained Cu3(HITP)2 structure. | rendered page 5 / article p.26070 · Chemiresistive Gas Sensing Properties of Pd1-cMOF · Figure S10 |
| Pd1-cMOF2024 · Single-Atom Catalysts in Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks: Enabling Reversible Gas Sensing at Room Temperature | Pd single atoms stabilised on Cu3(HITP)2Cu nodes plus Pd single atoms coordinated by four N atoms across neighbouring HITP layers · HITP | 2D · CompositeSAC-functionalised Cu3(HITP)2; Pd single atoms stabilised at interplanar 1D pore-wall sites with Pd-N4 coordination. | rendered pages 1 and 4 / article pp.26066 and 26069 · Abstract; Characterization of SACs Stabilized in cMOF · Figures 2e and S4; Table S2 |
| Cu3(HITP)22023 · Copper-cobalt bimetallic conductive metal–organic frameworks as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst in alkaline and neutral media | Cu3(HITP)2Cu ions coordinated by Cu-N4 sites; XPS indicates Cu+/Cu2+ components. · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineCovalently linked layered two-dimensional porous conductive MOF assigned from XRD peaks at 4.5, 9.3 and 27.5 degrees. | main p.2 · Results and discussion - Material characterization · Fig. 1b |
| Cu3(HITP)22023 · Microscopic Origin of Electrochemical Capacitance in Metal-Organic Frameworks | Cu3(HITP)2Cu coordinated by imino N donor environment in the model · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · Model SystemSecond 2D layered MOF model with similar pore size to Cu3(HHTP)2; studied computationally as a ligand-modified analogue. | 14534 · Modulating the EDL Structure with MOF Composition · Figure 6 |
| Cu3(HITP)22023 · Ruthenium(II) complex-grafted conductive metal-organic frameworks with conductivity- and confinement-enhanced electrochemiluminescence for ultrasensitive biosensing application | Cu3(HITP)2Cu centres in a HITP-based conductive framework · HITP from HATP.6HCl precursor | 2D · PristineAs-synthesised HITP conductive MOF comparator; PXRD and SEM shown in SI. | SI text · S-3.1; S-13 · Fig. S9 |
| Ru@Cu3(HITP)22023 · Ruthenium(II) complex-grafted conductive metal-organic frameworks with conductivity- and confinement-enhanced electrochemiluminescence for ultrasensitive biosensing application | Ru(bpydc)3 grafted in Cu3(HITP)2Cu framework nodes plus grafted Ru(II) bpydc complex · HITP framework; Ru(bpydc)3 guest | 2D · CompositeRu-grafted Cu3(HITP)2 comparator prepared by the same SALI-type method as Ru@Ni3(HITP)2. | SI text · S-3.3 |
| Cu-HITP conductive MOF2022 · Dissecting π-conjugated covalent-coupling over conductive MOFs toward efficient two-electron oxygen reduction | Not specifiedCu sites; expected Cu1-N4 moieties · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP) | 2D · PristineLayered honeycomb-like hexagonal conductive MOF with pi-conjugated metal-ligand centres; XRD peaks assigned to [100], [200], [210], and [001] planes. | 2 · 3.1 Morphology and structure characterization · Fig. 1a; Fig. S1 |
| Cu3(2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene)22022 · Catalysing the performance of Li-sulfur batteries with two-dimensional conductive metal organic frameworks | Cu3(HITP)2Cu · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP), nitrogen-based linker | 2D · Model SystemTriphenylene-based 2D honeycomb MOF monolayer; buckled Cu-centre configuration. | PDF p2-p3 / article p12401-p12402 · Introduction; 3.1 Structural and electronic properties · Figure 1; Table 1 |
| Cu3(HITP)22022 · Metal-Organic Framework Assembled on Oriented Nanofiber Arrays for Field-Effect Transistor and Gas Sensor-Based Applications | Cu3(HITP)2Cu centres; XPS of the NFA sample indicates mixed Cu(I)/Cu(II) features after redox-active HITP coordination. · HITP, 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineHexagonal layered 2D framework with slipped-parallel stacking; simulated unit cell a = b = 22.02 A, c = 6.6 A, alpha = beta = 90 degrees, gamma = 120 degrees. | 6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4 |
| Cu3(HITP)22022 · Thousand-fold increase in O2electroreduction rates with conductive MOFs | Cu3(HITP)2Copper nodes in an isostructural triphenylene-based conductive MOF framework. · HITP derived from HATP/HATP hydrochloride precursor. | 2D · PristineMonophasic porous crystalline 2D MOF isostructural to Ni3(HITP)2. | SI p.S9 · Supplementary text 1 · Figures S12-S15 |
| Cu3(HITP)2 metal-organic framework2022 · Quasi Solid–Liquid Reaction Strategy to In Situ Synthesize the Conductive MOF Film with Ordered Submicron Macropores for Gas Sensing | Cu3(HITP)2Cu ions coordinated to HITP-derived N sites; Cu(I)/Cu(II) surface species observed by XPS · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene, generated from HATP precursor | 2D · PristineMetal-organic graphite analogue; stacked monomolecular layers form parallel micropores; PXRD peaks at 4.6, 9.5 and 27.6 degrees identify Cu3(HITP)2. | p002 · Introduction |
| Cu3(HITP)2 MOF at PS template intermediate2022 · Quasi Solid–Liquid Reaction Strategy to In Situ Synthesize the Conductive MOF Film with Ordered Submicron Macropores for Gas Sensing | Cu3(HITP)2 with embedded/removable PS templateCu ions coordinated to HITP linker network · HITP linker from HATP precursor | 2D · CompositeIntermediate Cu3(HITP)2 MOF at PS layer before THF template removal; morphology remains isomorphic with solid HATP ligand at PS. | p004 · 2.3 Morphologies of each stage · Figure 2c,g |
| PDMS-PCDA/Cu3(HITP)2 nanofibre arrays2022 · Metal-Organic Framework Assembled on Oriented Nanofiber Arrays for Field-Effect Transistor and Gas Sensor-Based Applications | Cu3(HITP)2 grown on PDMS-PCDA/Cu NFAsCu nodes in Cu3(HITP)2 plus Cu-coordinated PDMS-PCDA template · HITP framework linker on PDMS-PCDA/Cu fibre arrays | 2D · CompositeDense Cu3(HITP)2 nanosheets grown in situ on oriented polymer/Cu nanofibres; XRD consistent with simulated Cu3(HITP)2 and TEM shows 1.9 nm (100) lattice spacing. | 6-8 · Results and Discussion · Figures 3-4 |
| Raw-Cu3(HITP)2 film without TOM structure2022 · Quasi Solid–Liquid Reaction Strategy to In Situ Synthesize the Conductive MOF Film with Ordered Submicron Macropores for Gas Sensing | Cu3(HITP)2Cu ions coordinated to HITP linker network · HITP linker from HATP precursor | 2D · PristineNo-template Cu3(HITP)2 film control on IDE; lacks ordered submicron macropores. | p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure S4 |
| TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 film2022 · Quasi Solid–Liquid Reaction Strategy to In Situ Synthesize the Conductive MOF Film with Ordered Submicron Macropores for Gas Sensing | Cu3(HITP)2 with three-dimensional ordered submicron macroporesCu ions coordinated to HITP linker network · HITP linker from HATP precursor | 2D · PristineCu3(HITP)2 framework film with TOM-micropore hierarchical morphology; submicron macropores are 3D ordered in short-range domains. | p001 · Abstract |
| Cu-HITP2021 · A comparative study of honeycomb-like 2D π-conjugated metal-organic framework chemiresistors: conductivity and channels | Cu3(HITP)2 / Cu3(HATP-derived)2, as reported in comparative cMOF literatureCuN4 square-planar nodes · hexaaminotriphenylene-derived HITP/HATP ligand | 2D · PristineHoneycomb-like 2D pi-conjugated cMOF; hexagonal P6/mmm-type unit cell discussed with Cu-HHTP; neutral framework without channel counterions after activation. | p003; article page 13237 · Results and discussion · Fig. 1 |
| Cu-HITP / Cu3(HITP)22021 · Layer-by-layer assembled dual-ligand conductive MOF nano-films with modulated chemiresistive sensitivity and selectivity | Cu3(HITP)2Cu ions / Cu-ligand sheets · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene or hexaiminotriphenylene as printed (HITP, -NH2) | 2D · PristineIsostructural pristine framework to Cu3(HHTP)2 with honeycomb-like porous 2D layers. | p001-p002 / article pp.438-439 · Introduction; Results and discussion · Fig. 1 |
| Cu3(HITP)22021 · Promoting ethylene production over a wide potential window on Cu crystallites induced and stabilized via current shock and charge delocalization | Cu3(HITP)2; HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenyleneCu nodes with mixed Cu2+ and Cu+ states in the pristine MOF · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP), prepared from HATP.6HCl | 2D · PristineSemiconductive crystalline conductive MOF with prominent XRD peaks between 3 and 30 degrees, rod-like nanocrystals, in-plane electron delocalisation and through-space charge transport. | 2 · Results - Structural characterization of Cu3(HITP)2 · Fig. 1 |
| Cu3(HITP)22021 · Two-Dimensional Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks as Highly Efficient Electrocatalysts for Lithium-Sulfur Batteries | Cu3(HITP)2Cu transition-metal nodes coordinated by N/O/S donor atoms in the 2D framework · HITP (2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene; C18H12N6) | 2D · Model SystemN-coordinated TM3(HITP)2 kagome 2D MOF; periodic monolayer slab model with kagome sublattice where applicable. | PDF p2 / article p.61206 · Introduction |
| Cu3(HITP)2 conductive Cu-MOF2021 · Si nanoparticles confined within a conductive 2D porous Cu-based metal–organic framework (Cu3(HITP)2) as potential anodes for high-capacity Li-ion batteries | Cu3(HITP)2Cu · HITP; precursor named HATP.6HCl / 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene | 2D · PristinePorous hexagonal 2D conductive Cu-MOF with slipped-parallel stacking of 2D sheets; XRD peaks assigned to (100), (200), and (001). | 2 · Introduction |
| KB@Cu3(HITP)22021 · Promoting ethylene production over a wide potential window on Cu crystallites induced and stabilized via current shock and charge delocalization | Cu3(HITP)2 plus Ketjen BlackCu nodes from Cu3(HITP)2, reduced to Cu0 crystallites under CO2RR · HITP-derived residual ligands after reconstruction | 2D · CompositeComposite catalyst/electrode of semiconductive Cu3(HITP)2 and conductive Ketjen Black; during CO2RR it rapidly forms and stabilises small Cu0 crystallites. | 2 · CO2RR of Cu3(HITP)2 with or without KB · Fig. 1a |
| Si nanoparticles coated with Cu3(HITP)22021 · Si nanoparticles confined within a conductive 2D porous Cu-based metal–organic framework (Cu3(HITP)2) as potential anodes for high-capacity Li-ion batteries | Si@Cu3(HITP)2Cu · HITP | 2D · CompositeComposite of SiNPs encapsulated by a porous conductive Cu3(HITP)2 network. | 1 · Abstract |
| Si@Cu3(HITP)2-5/LiCoO2 full cell2021 · Si nanoparticles confined within a conductive 2D porous Cu-based metal–organic framework (Cu3(HITP)2) as potential anodes for high-capacity Li-ion batteries | Si@Cu3(HITP)2-5/LiCoO2Cu; Co · HITP | unknown · CompositeElectrochemical full-cell assembly pairing a pre-lithiated Si@Cu3(HITP)2-5 anode with commercial LCO cathode. | 13 · Results and discussion · Fig. 9 |
| Cu3(HITP)22020 · Continuous Electrical Conductivity Variation in M3(Hexaiminotriphenylene)2(M = Co, Ni, Cu) MOF Alloys | Cu3(HITP)2Cu(II) · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineLayered electrically conducting MOF; synchrotron PXRD Pawley refinements fit orthorhombic Cmcm for pure M3(HITP)2; alloys are isostructural solid solutions following Vegard-type trends. | 12368-12369 · Results and Discussion · Figures 2-3; Table S1 |
| copper hexaiminotriphenylene (Cu3HITP2)2019 · Triphenylene-Bridged Trinuclear Complexes of Cu: Models for Spin Interactions in Two-Dimensional Electrically Conductive Metal-Organic Frameworks | Cu3HITP2Cu ions bridging hexaiminotriphenylene ligands in a 2D conductive MOF · HITP / hexaiminotriphenylene derived from 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene | 2D · PristineLayered graphene-like honeycomb conductive MOF used as the parent target for complex 2. | p001 / article p.10475 · Abstract |
| Cu3HITP22019 · Copper-based conductive metal organic framework in-situ grown on copper foam as a bifunctional electrocatalyst | Cu3HITP2Cu ions coordinated by N donor sites; Cu mainly assigned as Cu2+ by Cu 2p XPS · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene; precursor reported as HITP.6HCl | 2D · PristineTwo-dimensional layered/graphene-like conductive MOF; XRD peaks assigned to (100), (200), and (001) reflections. | 1404, 1407 · Abstract; 3.1 · Fig. 2, Fig. 3 |
| Cu3HITP2/CF2019 · Copper-based conductive metal organic framework in-situ grown on copper foam as a bifunctional electrocatalyst | Cu3HITP2 on copper foamCu-N coordinated Cu3HITP2 grown from Cu(OH)2 nanowires on copper foam · HITP | 2D · CompositeCu3HITP2 nanosheets grown on Cu(OH)2-derived nanowire morphology on copper foam. | 1404, 1408 · Abstract; 3.1 · Fig. 4 |
| Cu3(HITP)2 hexagonal MOF2018 · Modular O2 electroreduction activity in triphenylene-based metal-organic frameworks | Cu3(HITP)2Divalent Cu coordinated by hexaaminotriphenylene-derived N donors in a 2D honeycomb lattice. · HITP / hexaaminotriphenylene-derived ligand. | 2D · PristineHexagonal crystal system; 2D honeycomb lattice stacked in a slipped parallel configuration along c. | 1 · Results and discussion · Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 |
| Cu3(HITP)22015 · Cu3(hexaiminotriphenylene)2: An electrically conductive 2D metal-organic framework for chemiresistive sensing | Cu3(C18H12N6)2; HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenyleneCopper sites in o-phenylenediimine-linked 2D sheets; XPS interpreted as mixed Cu(I)/Cu(II) valency. · HITP, generated from 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene hexahydrochloride (HATP.6HCl). | 2D · PristineHexagonal 2D framework isostructural with Ni3(HITP)2, with slipped-parallel stacking of 2D sheets. | main p.1, article p.4349 · Abstract and introduction · Fig. 1 |
| Cu3(HITP)2 (MOF 2)2015 · Chemiresistive Sensor Arrays from Conductive 2D Metal-Organic Frameworks | Cu3(HITP)2Cu square-planar metal centres · HITP (2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene) | 2D · PristineConductive layered hexagonal 2D MOF; sheets stack in eclipsed or slipped-parallel conformations with extended 1D pores. | main p002 / article page 13781 · Results · Figure 1 |