Primary studyCore evidenceTheory Transport

Promoting ethylene production over a wide potential window on Cu crystallites induced and stabilized via current shock and charge delocalization

Sun H., Chen L., Xiong L. et al. · Nature Communications · 2021 · 6823

7materials
13samples
9synthesis routes
19measurements
75results
6claims and caveats

Evidence map

Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.

Author interpretations and caveats

Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.

Application RelevanceSupport assessment: Medium

The KB support effect extends to another semiconductive Cu MOF, Cu3(HHTP)2, where KB-supported samples also show stabilised ethylene production and particle size.

Caveat: HHTP extension is supported mainly by SI figures and qualitative text; no quantitative HHTP particle-size table is provided.

8 · Universality of the observations · Supplementary Figs. 30-33 · Linked to 5 structured results

Composite RoleSupport assessment: High

Adding Ketjen Black to semiconductive Cu3(HITP)2 greatly promotes and stabilises ethylene production over a wide potential window compared with stand-alone Cu3(HITP)2.

Caveat: Application performance is for electrochemically reconstructed catalyst states, not a permanently pristine MOF active site.

8 · Discussion · Linked to 4 structured results

Structure Property LinkSupport assessment: High

Rich grain boundaries, multifacets and under-coordinated sites on Cu-RNP-like crystallites enhance CO adsorption and favour C-C coupling toward C2H4 over CH4.

Caveat: DFT model represents post-electrolytic surface motifs rather than atomically exact experimental structures.

7 · Mechanistic comprehension · Fig. 5 · Linked to 5 structured results

Structure Property LinkSupport assessment: Medium

The Cu-RNP-like post-electrolytic surface from KB@Cu3(HITP)2 falls in the CO2RR-dominant zone, whereas Cu(111) surface sites fall in the HER-dominant zone.

Caveat: The selectivity map is from calculated *H and *CO binding energies; the key numerical values are mainly graphical and were not digitised.

7 · Mechanistic comprehension · Fig. 5d-e · Linked to 3 structured results

Structure Property LinkSupport assessment: Medium

MOF-derived Cu crystallites outperform KB-supported naked Cu nanoparticles because the MOF precursor yields stabilised, lattice-diverse Cu motifs and possibly residual-ligand tethering.

Caveat: Residual-ligand tethering is proposed rather than directly isolated.

6 · Control studies with naked Cu nanoparticles · Supplementary Figs. 13-15 · Linked to 3 structured results

Transport MechanismSupport assessment: High

The conducting KB support provides higher current density and charge delocalisation, accelerating Cu-node reduction while suppressing aggregation of reduced Cu crystallites.

Caveat: Mechanism is inferred from operando XAS, ex situ XRD/TEM and analogy to charge delocalisation in battery SEI systems.

5 · Ex situ time-lapse XRD and TEM · Figs. 3-4 · Linked to 4 structured results

Material identities

Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.

MaterialCompositionStructure contextSource
Cu(111) surface modelCu(111)Cu atoms2D · Model SystemDFT model for post-electrolytic Cu3(HITP)2 represented by a 4 x 4 x 4 Cu(111) supercell.6 · Mechanistic comprehension · Supplementary Fig. 20
Cu3(HHTP)2Browse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTPCu3(HHTP)2; HHTP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenyleneCu nodes · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP)2D · PristineSimilar semiconductive Cu MOF used to test whether the Ketjen Black effect extends beyond Cu3(HITP)2.8 · Universality of the observations · Supplementary Figs. 30-33
Cu3(HITP)2Browse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITPCu3(HITP)2; HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenyleneCu nodes with mixed Cu2+ and Cu+ states in the pristine MOF · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP), prepared from HATP.6HCl2D · PristineSemiconductive crystalline conductive MOF with prominent XRD peaks between 3 and 30 degrees, rod-like nanocrystals, in-plane electron delocalisation and through-space charge transport.2 · Results - Structural characterization of Cu3(HITP)2 · Fig. 1
Cu rectangular nanopyramid modelCu-RNP on Cu(101)Cu atoms0D · Model SystemDFT model for post-electrolytic KB@Cu3(HITP)2: [101] Cu rectangular nanopyramids on a 5 x 5 x 1 Cu(101) surface with adjacent (100) and (111) facets.6 · Mechanistic comprehension · Fig. 5c; Supplementary Fig. 19
KB@Cu3(HHTP)2Browse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTPCu3(HHTP)2 plus Ketjen BlackCu nodes from Cu3(HHTP)2, reconstructed during CO2RR · HHTP-derived residual ligands after reconstruction2D · CompositeConductive carbon-supported Cu3(HHTP)2 composite catalyst.8 · Universality of the observations · Supplementary Fig. 32
KB@Cu3(HITP)2Browse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITPCu3(HITP)2 plus Ketjen BlackCu nodes from Cu3(HITP)2, reduced to Cu0 crystallites under CO2RR · HITP-derived residual ligands after reconstruction2D · CompositeComposite catalyst/electrode of semiconductive Cu3(HITP)2 and conductive Ketjen Black; during CO2RR it rapidly forms and stabilises small Cu0 crystallites.2 · CO2RR of Cu3(HITP)2 with or without KB · Fig. 1a
KB@CuNPsCommercial Cu nanoparticles plus Ketjen BlackCu metal nanoparticles0D · CompositeNaked commercial Cu nanoparticles (10-30 nm) dispersed with Ketjen Black as a non-MOF control.6 · Control studies with naked Cu nanoparticles · Supplementary Figs. 13-15

Sample register

Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.

Show 13 sample records
SampleForm and roleProcessing and geometrySource
Cu(111) model for post-electrolytic Cu3(HITP)2research_0479__mat__cu111_modelModel · Model System · ModelDFT relaxed Cu(111) slab model.4 x 4 x 4 Cu(111) supercell9 · Methods - Computational methods
Stand-alone Cu3(HHTP)2 CO2RR electroderesearch_0479__mat__cu3_hhtp2Electrode · Pristine Control · Pristine FrameworkCu3(HHTP)2 tested without conducting KB support.CO2RR electrode8 · Universality of the observations · Supplementary Fig. 32
As-synthesised Cu3(HHTP)2 powderresearch_0479__mat__cu3_hhtp2Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine FrameworkAs-synthesised blue powder, centrifuged, washed and dried under vacuum.9 · Methods - Synthesis of Cu3(HHTP)2
Stand-alone Cu3(HITP)2 CO2RR electroderesearch_0479__mat__cu3_hitp2Electrode · Pristine Control · Pristine FrameworkCu3(HITP)2 catalyst electrode tested without Ketjen Black conducting support.Glassy carbon for H-cell testing; carbon paper for ex situ XRD; gas diffusion electrode for flow cell testing2 · CO2RR of Cu3(HITP)2 with or without KB · Fig. 2
As-synthesised Cu3(HITP)2 powderresearch_0479__mat__cu3_hitp2Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine FrameworkAs-synthesised black powder, washed and dried under vacuum.9 · Methods - Synthesis of Cu3(HITP)2
Cu-RNP model for post-electrolytic KB@Cu3(HITP)2research_0479__mat__cu_rnp_modelModel · Model System · ModelDFT relaxed Cu rectangular nanopyramid model with (100) and (111) sidewall facets.5 x 5 x 1 Cu(101) surface9 · Methods - Computational methods
KB@Cu3(HHTP)2 CO2RR electroderesearch_0479__mat__kb_cu3_hhtp2Electrode · Target Sample · CompositeCu3(HHTP)2 tested with Ketjen Black conducting support.CO2RR electrode8 · Universality of the observations · Supplementary Fig. 32
KB@Cu3(HITP)2 CO2RR electroderesearch_0479__mat__kb_cu3_hitp2Electrode · Target Sample · CompositeCu3(HITP)2 mixed with Ketjen Black conducting agent and tested for CO2RR.Glassy carbon for H-cell testing; carbon paper for ex situ XRD; gas diffusion electrode for flow cell testing · Flow-cell catalyst loading 0.8 mg cm-29 · Methods - Electrochemical measurements
KB@CuNPs control electroderesearch_0479__mat__kb_cunpsElectrode · Pristine Control · CompositeCommercial Cu nanoparticles dispersed with Ketjen Black and tested under CO2RR.H-cell electrode6 · Control studies with naked Cu nanoparticles · Supplementary Figs. 13-15
Post-electrolytic Cu3(HHTP)2 after CO2RRresearch_0479__mat__cu3_hhtp2Electrode · Pristine Control · Derived CarbonPost-CO2RR stand-alone Cu3(HHTP)2 after 0.25 h at varying potentials.CO2RR electrode after testing18 · Figures and Tables · Supplementary Fig. 33
Post-electrolytic Cu3(HITP)2 after CO2RRresearch_0479__mat__cu3_hitp2Electrode · Pristine Control · Derived CarbonElectrochemically reconstructed stand-alone MOF with larger aggregated Cu particles.CO2RR electrode after testing5 · Ex situ time-lapse XRD and TEM · Fig. 4g-j
Post-electrolytic KB@Cu3(HHTP)2 after CO2RRresearch_0479__mat__kb_cu3_hhtp2Electrode · Target Sample · Derived CarbonPost-CO2RR sample after 0.25 h at varying potentials.CO2RR electrode after testing18 · Figures and Tables · Supplementary Fig. 33
Post-electrolytic KB@Cu3(HITP)2 after CO2RRresearch_0479__mat__kb_cu3_hitp2Electrode · Target Sample · Derived CarbonElectrochemically reconstructed after CO2RR; Cu nodes reduced to small Cu0 crystallites dispersed with carbon and residual ligand-derived matrix.Carbon-containing electrode matrix after CO2RR6 · Mechanistic comprehension · Fig. 5a; Supplementary Figs. 16-17