Zhang C., Chen Z., Lian Y. et al. · Wuli Huaxue Xuebao/ Acta Physico - Chimica Sinica · 2019 · 1404-1411
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Cu3HITP2/CF is reported as a bifunctional OER/ORR electrocatalyst directly usable as a working electrode without extra binder, conductive agent, or heat treatment.
Caveat: Application performance is measured for the composite electrode; intrinsic framework conductivity was not measured directly in this paper.
1404 · Abstract · Linked to 5 structured results
Despite the conductive-MOF framing, the paper does not report a first-hand electrical conductivity, mobility, Seebeck coefficient, thermal conductivity, Hall, or thermoelectric measurement for Cu3HITP2/CF.
Caveat: The introduction cites literature conductivities for Ni3HITP2 and Cu3HITP2, but these were not extracted as first-hand results for this paper.
1405 · 1 Introduction
The authors assign Cu3HITP2 as a two-dimensional layered/graphene-like conductive MOF based on XRD, Raman, XPS, SEM and TEM evidence.
Caveat: The extraction did not find gas sorption, crystallographic refinement, or direct conductivity measurements in this paper.
1407-1408 · 3.1 · Fig. 2-Fig. 4 · Linked to 5 structured results
Cu3HITP2 grown on copper foam gives larger ECSA/faster charge transfer than Cu(OH)2/CF or powder Cu3HITP2, which the authors link to improved OER and ORR activity.
Caveat: ECSA/Cdl and EIS numerical values are graphical estimates; the qualitative comparison is explicitly stated in the main text.
1408-1409 · 3.2-3.3 · Fig. S7-S11 · Linked to 5 structured results
Cu(OH)2 nanowires grown on copper foam are converted in situ to Cu3HITP2, retaining a nanowire-like electrode morphology with Cu3HITP2 nanosheets.
Caveat: No independent crystallographic model/CIF is provided in the assigned documents.
1408 · 3.1 · Fig. 4, Fig. S2-S4 · Linked to 4 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copper foam | Cumetallic Cu foam | 3D · UnknownCommercial copper foam substrate/control, thickness 1.5 mm. | 1406 · 2.1 |
| Cu3HITP2Browse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITP | Cu3HITP2Cu ions coordinated by N donor sites; Cu mainly assigned as Cu2+ by Cu 2p XPS · HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaaminotriphenylene; precursor reported as HITP.6HCl | 2D · PristineTwo-dimensional layered/graphene-like conductive MOF; XRD peaks assigned to (100), (200), and (001) reflections. | 1404, 1407 · Abstract; 3.1 · Fig. 2, Fig. 3 |
| Cu3HITP2/CFBrowse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITP | Cu3HITP2 on copper foamCu-N coordinated Cu3HITP2 grown from Cu(OH)2 nanowires on copper foam · HITP | 2D · CompositeCu3HITP2 nanosheets grown on Cu(OH)2-derived nanowire morphology on copper foam. | 1404, 1408 · Abstract; 3.1 · Fig. 4 |
| Cu(OH)2/CF | Cu(OH)2 on copper foamCu(OH)2 nanowires on copper foam | 1D · CompositeNeedle/nanowire Cu(OH)2 precursor and electrochemical control. | 1406 · 2.2.1 · Fig. 1, Fig. S2 |
| Pt/C/CF | Pt/C on copper foamPt/C catalyst benchmark | unknown · CompositeCommercial Pt/C benchmark shown for ORR comparison. | 1410 · 3.3 · Fig. 6 |
| RuO2/CF | RuO2 on copper foamRuO2 particles on copper foam | unknown · CompositeCommercial RuO2 ink drop-cast on copper foam as OER benchmark. | 1406 · 2.3 · Fig. 5 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| blank copper foamresearch_0016__mat__mat_copper_foam | Electrode · Pristine Control · Unknown | Commercial copper foam acid-cleaned and dried.1.5 mm | 1406 · 2.1, 2.2.1 · Fig. S1 |
| Cu3HITP2/CFresearch_0016__mat__mat_cu3hitp2_cf | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Cu3HITP2 nanosheets grown in situ from Cu(OH)2/CF and dried at 60 degC under vacuum for 12 h.copper foam · copper foam thickness 1.5 mm; Cu3HITP2 loading 7.2 mg cm-2 | 1406 · 2.2.2 · Fig. 1, Fig. S1 |
| ultrasonically removed Cu3HITP2 ink on glassy carbonresearch_0016__mat__mat_cu3hitp2 | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Cu3HITP2 removed from copper foam by ultrasonication, dispersed in ethanol/water/Nafion, and dropped on a glassy carbon electrode for RRDE.glassy carbon | 1409 · 3.3 · Fig. 6c |
| powder/delaminated Cu3HITP2research_0016__mat__mat_cu3hitp2 | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Powder or ultrasonically delaminated Cu3HITP2 used for powder comparison and RRDE ink preparation. | 1409 · 3.2-3.3 · Fig. S8, Fig. S10, Fig. S12 |
| Cu(OH)2/CFresearch_0016__mat__mat_cuoh2_cf | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Electroplated Cu(OH)2 nanowires on copper foam.copper foam · copper foam thickness 1.5 mm | 1406 · 2.2.1 · Fig. S2 |
| Pt/C/CFresearch_0016__mat__mat_ptc_cf | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | Commercial Pt/C benchmark electrode; preparation not described.copper foam | 1410 · 3.3 · Fig. 6 |
| RuO2/CFresearch_0016__mat__mat_ruo2_cf | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | RuO2/Nafion ink drop-cast on copper foam and dried at 45 degC.copper foam | 1406 · 2.3 · Fig. 5 |