Primary studyPeripheral evidenceEnergy Storage

Conductive metal-organic framework synthesis from metal nanoparticle precursors

Lister A.M., Wang Y., Armitage B.I. et al. · JPhys Materials · 2025 · 025004

2materials
14samples
14synthesis routes
17measurements
47results
9claims and caveats

Evidence map

Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.

Author interpretations and caveats

Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.

Application RelevanceSupport assessment: High

The nanoparticle precursor route generates Cu3(HITP)2 and Ni3(HITP)2 on both conducting and insulating substrates including cotton, glass, gold and paper.

Caveat: Evidence is morphological/spectroscopic on lab-scale samples; device performance was not measured.

p002 · Abstract · Linked to 2 structured results

CaveatSupport assessment: High

For Cu3(HITP)2 samples, Cu2+ and Cu/Cu+ features are present, but residual metallic Cu in nanoparticle cores cannot be ruled out by XPS alone.

Caveat: In situ PXRD was explicitly identified as needed to resolve residual elemental Cu or Ni cores.

p006 · Results and discussion · Linked to 3 structured results

CaveatSupport assessment: High

The paper motivates energy-storage, sensing and wearable-device relevance but does not report electrochemical, sensing, thermoelectric or porosity performance data for the new samples.

Caveat: Only synthesis, structural/spectroscopic/microscopy characterisation and simple resistance measurements are first-hand in the provided documents.

p010 · Conclusions

Phase AssignmentSupport assessment: High

Ni nanoparticles are converted to oxidised Ni species in the XPS-accessible top layer of Ni3(HITP)2 samples, with no metallic Ni peak observed within the top layer.

Caveat: Depth-limited XPS cannot establish conversion of buried nanoparticle cores beyond the sampling depth.

p006 · Results and discussion · Figures S17-S19 · Linked to 2 structured results

Structure Property LinkSupport assessment: Medium

The Ni3(HITP)2 paper sample has lower measured resistance than Cu3(HITP)2 after 24 h despite lower Ni MOF coverage, consistent with literature reports of higher inherent Ni3(HITP)2 conductivity.

Caveat: Interpretation relies on prior literature and unnormalised resistance measurements.

p010 · Results and discussion · Figure 7 · Linked to 2 structured results

Synthesis MechanismSupport assessment: Medium

Cu3(HITP)2 grows faster than Ni3(HITP)2 on paper, with an estimated minimum six-fold faster growth rate under the time-series conditions.

Caveat: Growth-rate ratio is inferred visually from SEM time points rather than directly measured kinetic data.

p007 · Results and discussion · Figures S2-S3 · Linked to 2 structured results

Synthesis MechanismSupport assessment: Medium

MOF grows outward from deposited metal nanoparticles, so coverage follows the nanoparticle distribution and the MOF is anchored to the substrate through the nanoparticles.

Caveat: Mechanism is proposed from morphology and chemistry; in situ diffraction would be needed to determine residual metal cores.

p004 · Materials synthesis · Linked to 2 structured results

Synthesis MechanismSupport assessment: High

TBMAMS electrolyte suppresses large HATP ligand crystal formation and enables more desired Cu3(HITP)2 formation under ammonia-containing conditions.

Caveat: The authors report TBMAMS was the first and only electrolyte tried; electrolyte generality was not tested.

p020 · Method Development · Linked to 3 structured results

Transport MechanismSupport assessment: High

After 24 h synthesis on paper, both Cu3(HITP)2 and Ni3(HITP)2 samples become electrically measurable by two-contact resistance, whereas nanoparticle-decorated paper precursors were insulating.

Caveat: Reported resistance includes film morphology, paper substrate, contact resistance and 0.5 cm geometry; it is not an intrinsic conductivity.

p010 · Results and discussion · Figure 7 · Linked to 3 structured results

Material identities

Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.

MaterialCompositionStructure contextSource
Cu3(HITP)2Browse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITPCu3(HITP)2Cu nodes; XPS indicates Cu2+ plus Cu/Cu+ species, with residual metallic Cu cores not ruled out for nanoparticle-derived samples. · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP), formed from HATP.6HCl precursor2D · Pristine2D hexagonal sheets that stack in a slipped parallel arrangement to create extended pore channels; PXRD indexed as hexagonal with a = b = 21.7 A and c = 3.2 A for foil-derived powder.p003 · Introduction · Figure 1
Ni3(HITP)2Browse family: Ni₃(HITP)₂ / Ni–HITPNi3(HITP)2Ni nodes; Ni 2p3/2 binding energies above 855.5 eV indicate oxidised Ni and no metallic Ni within the top 5 nm/6 nm sampling depth reported. · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene (HITP), formed from HATP.6HCl precursor2D · Pristine2D hexagonal sheets with slipped parallel stacking; TEM interlayer spacing measured as 3.3 A.p003 · Introduction · Figure 1

Sample register

Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.

Show 14 sample records
SampleForm and roleProcessing and geometrySource
Cu3(HITP)2 powder from pure Cu metal for TEMresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Powder · Target Sample · Pristine FrameworkMOF scraped from pure Cu metal, dispersed in ethanol and drop-cast onto holey carbon TEM grid.pure Cu metal surface during synthesis; drop-cast onto Cu TEM grid for imagingp005 · Characterisation techniques
Cu3(HITP)2 on cotton fabricresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework1 h in situ growth from Cu nanoparticles.200 thread count cotton percale · Cu nanoparticle loading 8000 ng cm-2 on cottonp009 · Results and discussion · Figure 6
Cu3(HITP)2 powder scraped from copper foil for PXRDresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Powder · Target Sample · Pristine FrameworkSynthesis scaled up using copper foil instead of nanoparticles; powder scraped off foil for PXRD.copper foil scale-up substratep006 · Results and discussion · Figure 3d
Cu3(HITP)2 on Pt/glass interdigitated electrodesresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine FrameworkIn situ MOF grown from Cu nanoparticles for 1 h; MOF left adhered to substrate.Pt IDEs with 5 um gaps on glass · Cu nanoparticle loading 7000 ng cm-2; equivalent continuous-film thickness ca. 7.7 nm before conversionp003 · Materials synthesis
Cu3(HITP)2 on Au(111)/micaresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework1 h in situ growth from Cu nanoparticles.300 nm Au(111) film on mica · Cu nanoparticle loading 7000 ng cm-2 on Au(111)p009 · Results and discussion · Figure 6
Cu-on-paper no-TBMAMS failed synthesis controlresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Thin Film · Pristine Control · Unknown3 h in HATP/ammonia ethanol-water solution without TBMAMS; produced large HATP crystals and less desired MOF.white paper card, 1 cm by 1 cm pieces · Cu nanoparticle loading 7000 ng cm-2p018 · Method Development · Figure S20
Cu3(HITP)2 on paper, 24 h, silver-dag contactsresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine Framework24 h submersion in ligand/electrolyte solution; contacts added for resistance measurement.white paper card with silver dag contacts separated by 0.5 cm · Cu nanoparticle loading 5000 ng cm-2 before conversionp010 · Results and discussion · Figure 7
Cu3(HITP)2 on white paper time-series samplesresearch_0815__mat__cu_hitp2Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine FrameworkPaper samples submerged for 1 min to 24 h; SEM shown at 0 min, 10 min, 1 h and 24 h.white paper card · Cu nanoparticle loading 5000 ng cm-2 on paperp008 · Results and discussion · Figure 5
Ni3(HITP)2 powder from pure Ni metal for TEMresearch_0815__mat__ni_hitp2Powder · Target Sample · Pristine FrameworkMOF scraped from pure Ni metal, dispersed in ethanol and drop-cast onto holey carbon TEM grid.pure Ni metal surface during synthesis; drop-cast onto Cu TEM grid for imagingp006 · Results and discussion
Ni3(HITP)2 on cotton fabricresearch_0815__mat__ni_hitp2Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework1 h in situ growth from Ni nanoparticles.200 thread count cotton percale · Ni nanoparticle loading 8000 ng cm-2 on cottonp006 · Further SEM images · Figure S5
Ni3(HITP)2 on Pt/glass interdigitated electrodesresearch_0815__mat__ni_hitp2Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine FrameworkIn situ MOF grown from Ni nanoparticles for 1 h; MOF left adhered to substrate.Pt IDEs with 5 um gaps on glass · Ni nanoparticle loading 7000 ng cm-2; equivalent continuous-film thickness ca. 7.7 nm before conversionp003 · Materials synthesis
Ni3(HITP)2 on Au(111)/micaresearch_0815__mat__ni_hitp2Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine Framework1 h in situ growth from Ni nanoparticles.300 nm Au(111) film on mica · Ni nanoparticle loading 7000 ng cm-2 on Au(111)p006 · Further SEM images · Figure S5
Ni3(HITP)2 on paper, 24 h, silver-dag contactsresearch_0815__mat__ni_hitp2Electrode · Target Sample · Pristine Framework24 h submersion in ligand/electrolyte solution; contacts added for resistance measurement.white paper card with silver dag contacts separated by 0.5 cm · Ni nanoparticle loading 5000 ng cm-2 before conversionp010 · Results and discussion · Figure 7
Ni3(HITP)2 on white paper time-series samplesresearch_0815__mat__ni_hitp2Thin Film · Target Sample · Pristine FrameworkPaper samples treated for the same time series as Cu for growth-rate comparison.white paper card · Ni nanoparticle loading 5000 ng cm-2 on paperp004 · Further SEM images · Figure S3