cMOF Evidence Base
Sensing Application — Quasi Solid–Liquid Reaction Strategy to In Situ Synthesize the Conductive MOF Film with Ordered Submicron Macropores for Gas Sensing

Measurement evidence

Sensing Application

Quasi Solid–Liquid Reaction Strategy to In Situ Synthesize the Conductive MOF Film with Ordered Submicron Macropores for Gas Sensing · Miao M., Wang Z., Guo Z. et al. · Advanced Materials Interfaces · 2022 · 2101908

2 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Chemiresistive H2S gas sensing

IDE loaded with Raw-Cu3(HITP)2 film · Electrode

Same room-temperature CGS-MT H2S sensing test as TOM sample.

Temperature
298.15
Atmosphere
N2 baseline and H2S/N2 test atmospheres from 0 to 160 ppm H2S
Geometry
ceramic-based gold IDE loaded with Raw-Cu3(HITP)2 film
Context
pristine no-template control
Measurement source
p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h; Figure S5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Raw sensor resistance near 80 ppm H2Sapprox 18 MOhm from Figure S5—visual estimate from SI plotted axisFigure Axis
Approximate		p004 · Supporting Information · Figure S5
Raw-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 80 ppm H2S78.5 / 6.7 = approx 11.7—calculated from reported TOM response and improvement factorCalculated From Reported
Approximate		p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h

Chemiresistive H2S gas sensing

IDE loaded with TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 film · Electrode

Sino Aggtech CGS-MT system with automatic N2/H2S gas mixer; H2S concentrations injected from low to high until resistance stabilised.

Temperature
298.15
Atmosphere
N2 baseline and H2S/N2 test atmospheres from 0 to 160 ppm H2S
Geometry
ceramic-based gold IDE loaded with TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 film
Context
target pristine framework film sensor
Measurement source
p005-p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h; Figure S5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
TOM sensor resistance near 80 ppm H2Sapprox 98 MOhm from Figure S5—visual estimate from SI plotted axisFigure Axis
Approximate		p004 · Supporting Information · Figure S5
TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 10 ppm H2Sapprox 18 from Figure 3h—visual estimate from plotted axisFigure Axis
Approximate		p005 · Figure 3 · Figure 3h
TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 160 ppm H2Sapprox 82 from Figure 3h; little increase versus 80 ppm—visual estimate from plotted axisFigure Axis
Approximate		p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h
TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 1 ppm H2S2.3——Text
Exact Reported		p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h inset
TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 20 ppm H2Sapprox 38 from Figure 3h—visual estimate from plotted axisFigure Axis
Approximate		p005 · Figure 3 · Figure 3h
TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 40 ppm H2Sapprox 58 from Figure 3h—visual estimate from plotted axisFigure Axis
Approximate		p005 · Figure 3 · Figure 3h
TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 5 ppm H2Sapprox 6 from Figure 3h inset—visual estimate from insetFigure Axis
Approximate		p005 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h inset
TOM-Cu3(HITP)2 response to 80 ppm H2SMarked as a best value within this paper78.5——Text
Exact Reported		p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h
TOM versus Raw response improvement at 80 ppm H2SMarked as a best value within this paper6.7x——Text
Exact Reported		p001 · Abstract · Figure 3h
Upper detection-limit proximity80 ppm is close to their upper detection limits——Text
Approximate		p006 · 2.5 H2S gas sensor · Figure 3h