Zhang J.-L., Gao S., Yang Y. et al. · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · 2023 · 115157
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
The biosensor shows selectivity against tested interferents, 0.93% reproducibility RSD, and low RSD during 20-cycle stability tests.
Caveat: Selectivity bar heights were not digitised; qualitative selectivity is captured in claims rather than numeric results.
p006 · 3.6 · Fig. 5 · Linked to 3 structured results
The Ru@Ni3(HITP)2-based ECL biosensor enables ultrasensitive thrombin detection from 1 fM to 1 nM with 0.62 fM LOD.
Caveat: Application result depends on Exo I target-cycling amplification and the full AuNP/aptamer/Fc-S1 electrode architecture.
p005 · 3.5 · Fig. 4 · Linked to 5 structured results
Human serum spike recoveries near 100% indicate practical applicability for TB detection.
Caveat: Serum assays are spike-recovery tests, not clinical validation across patient samples.
p006 · 3.7 · Table 2 · Linked to 4 structured results
AuNPs provide the effective Au-S anchoring interface for the thiolated thrombin aptamer; pi-pi adsorption of aptamers directly on Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 has negligible influence on detection performance.
Caveat: Evidence is based on ECL quenching/recovery comparison, not direct surface-coverage quantification.
SI text · S-17 · Fig. S12 · Linked to 2 structured results
Ru grafting preserves the crystallinity and Ni3(HITP)2 framework structure.
Caveat: Only principal PXRD peak list captured here; full pattern is in Fig. 1A.
p003 · 3.1 · Fig. 1A · Linked to 2 structured results
Ru(bpydc) complex was grafted into Ni3(HITP)2 through carboxylate-Ni coordination and electrostatic interaction.
Caveat: Ru(bpydc) location in channels is inferred from combined spectroscopic and charge evidence rather than direct pore imaging.
p004 · 3.1 · Figs. S5-S8 · Linked to 6 structured results
Higher M3(HITP)2 carrier conductivity leads to lower Ret and stronger ECL intensity/efficiency for Ru@M3(HITP)2 emitters.
Caveat: Conductivity values are cited from Chen et al. 2020, while EIS/ECL comparisons are first-hand in this paper.
p004 · 3.3 · Fig. 3A-B; Table S2 · Linked to 11 structured results
Hydrophobic porous Ni3(HITP)2 enriches lipophilic TPrA and provides confined conductive channels, improving TPrA oxidation and ECL reaction efficiency.
Caveat: Mechanism is inferred from ECL/CV comparisons; direct TPrA uptake in pores is not separately quantified.
p004 · 3.3 · Fig. 3C-D · Linked to 3 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co3(HITP)2Browse family: Co₃(HITP)₂ / Co–HITP | Co3(HITP)2Co centres in a HITP-based conductive framework · HITP from HATP.6HCl precursor | 2D · PristineAs-synthesised HITP conductive MOF comparator; PXRD and SEM shown in SI. | SI text · S-3.2; S-13 · Fig. S9 |
| Cu3(HITP)2Browse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITP | Cu3(HITP)2Cu centres in a HITP-based conductive framework · HITP from HATP.6HCl precursor | 2D · PristineAs-synthesised HITP conductive MOF comparator; PXRD and SEM shown in SI. | SI text · S-3.1; S-13 · Fig. S9 |
| Ni3(HITP)2Browse family: Ni₃(HITP)₂ / Ni–HITP | Ni3(HITP)2Ni centres in a HITP-based conductive framework · HITP from 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene / HATP.6HCl precursor | 2D · PristineConductive MOF with simulated Ni3(HITP)2 PXRD match; reported positively charged framework with large channels. | p002 · Introduction; 2.1; 3.1 · Fig. 1A |
| Ru@Co3(HITP)2Browse family: Co₃(HITP)₂ / Co–HITP | Ru(bpydc)3 grafted in Co3(HITP)2Co framework nodes plus grafted Ru(II) bpydc complex · HITP framework; Ru(bpydc)3 guest | 2D · CompositeRu-grafted Co3(HITP)2 comparator prepared by the same SALI-type method as Ru@Ni3(HITP)2. | SI text · S-3.3 |
| Ru@Cu3(HITP)2Browse family: Cu₃(HITP)₂ / Cu–HITP | Ru(bpydc)3 grafted in Cu3(HITP)2Cu framework nodes plus grafted Ru(II) bpydc complex · HITP framework; Ru(bpydc)3 guest | 2D · CompositeRu-grafted Cu3(HITP)2 comparator prepared by the same SALI-type method as Ru@Ni3(HITP)2. | SI text · S-3.3 |
| Ru@Ni3(HITP)2Browse family: Ni₃(HITP)₂ / Ni–HITP | Ru(bpydc)3 grafted in Ni3(HITP)2Ni framework nodes plus grafted Ru(II) bpydc complex · HITP framework; Ru(bpydc)3 guest from tris(4,4'-dicarboxylicacid-2,2'-bipyridyl) ruthenium(II) dichloride | 2D · CompositeRu complex grafted into Ni3(HITP)2 channels by electrostatic attraction and coordination; PXRD shows framework retained. | p001-p002 · Abstract; Introduction · Scheme 1A |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co3(HITP)2 black powderresearch_0807__mat__co_hitp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Open-beaker product washed with ultrapure water and methanol, dried under vacuum at 60 deg C. | SI text · S-3.2 |
| Cu3(HITP)2 black powderresearch_0807__mat__cu_hitp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Open-beaker product washed with ultrapure water and methanol, dried under vacuum at 60 deg C. | SI text · S-3.1 |
| Fc-S1/HT/aptamer/AuNPs/Ru@Ni3(HITP)2/GCE biosensorresearch_0807__mat__ru_ni_hitp | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | Ru@Ni3(HITP)2/GCE sequentially modified with AuNPs, TB aptamer, hexanethiol and Fc-S1, then incubated with TB and Exo I for assay.Glass carbon electrode | p002-p003 · 2.3 Construction of the ECL sensing platform · Scheme 1B |
| Ni3(HITP)2/GCEresearch_0807__mat__ni_hitp | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Ni3(HITP)2-modified GCE used for confinement and EIS controls.Glass carbon electrode | p004-p005 · 3.3 · Fig. 3C-D |
| Ni3(HITP)2 black powderresearch_0807__mat__ni_hitp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Centrifuged black suspension, washed with ultrapure water and methanol, dried in vacuum at 60 deg C. | p002 · 2.1 Synthesis of Ni3(HITP)2 |
| Ru@Co3(HITP)2/GCEresearch_0807__mat__ru_co_hitp | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Ru@Co3(HITP)2 modified GCE prepared for ECL and EIS comparison.Glass carbon electrode | p004-p005 · 3.3 · Fig. 3A-B |
| Ru@Co3(HITP)2 powderresearch_0807__mat__ru_co_hitp | Powder · Pristine Control · Guest Loaded | Ru grafted into Co3(HITP)2 in DMF at 60 deg C for 36 h, washed and vacuum dried. | SI text · S-3.3 |
| Ru@Cu3(HITP)2/GCEresearch_0807__mat__ru_cu_hitp | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Ru@Cu3(HITP)2 modified GCE prepared for ECL and EIS comparison.Glass carbon electrode | p004-p005 · 3.3 · Fig. 3A-B |
| Ru@Cu3(HITP)2 powderresearch_0807__mat__ru_cu_hitp | Powder · Pristine Control · Guest Loaded | Ru grafted into Cu3(HITP)2 in DMF at 60 deg C for 36 h, washed and vacuum dried. | SI text · S-3.3 |
| Ru@Ni3(HITP)2/GCEresearch_0807__mat__ru_ni_hitp | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | 12 uL of 1 mg/mL Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 dispersion dropped on clean GCE to form a uniform film.Glass carbon electrode | p003 · 2.3 Construction of the ECL sensing platform · Scheme 1B |
| Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 powderresearch_0807__mat__ru_ni_hitp | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | SALI-type Ru grafting product; centrifuged, washed with DMF and ultrapure water, dried under vacuum at 60 deg C. | p003 · 2.2 Synthesis of Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 · Scheme 1A |