Spectroscopy — Ruthenium(II) complex-grafted conductive metal-organic frameworks with conductivity- and confinement-enhanced electrochemiluminescence for ultrasensitive biosensing application

Measurement evidence

Spectroscopy

Ruthenium(II) complex-grafted conductive metal-organic frameworks with conductivity- and confinement-enhanced electrochemiluminescence for ultrasensitive biosensing application · Zhang J.-L., Gao S., Yang Y. et al. · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · 2023 · 115157

2 measurement groups · 16 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

ECL emission spectrum and photoluminescence spectrum

Ru@Ni3(HITP)2/GCE · Electrode

Ru@Ni3(HITP)2/GCE in 2 mL PBS (0.1 M, pH 7.0) including 10 uL TPrA; potential 0.2-1.25 V at 0.2 V/s for ECL spectrum.

Geometry
Modified GCE in three-electrode electrochemical cell
Context
Target Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 electrode.
Measurement source
SI text · S-4 · Fig. 2
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Maximum ECL emissionMarked as a best value within this paper638 nmText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.2 · Fig. 2B-C
ECL red-shift relative to PL25 nmText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.2 · Fig. 2C
Maximum PL emission613 nmText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.2 · Fig. 2C

FTIR, UV-vis, zeta potential, DLS, ICP-OES, XPS

Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 powder · Powder

Characterisation of Ru grafting, charge reversal, particle size and Ru/Ni ratio.

Context
Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 compared against Ni3(HITP)2 and Ru precursor.
Measurement source
p004 · 3.1 · Figs. S4-S8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Ni3(HITP)2 average DLS diameter255 nmText
Approximate
p004 · 3.1 · Fig. S7C
Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 average DLS diameteraround 955 nmText
Approximate
p004 · 3.1 · Fig. S7C
Protonated carboxyl FTIR peak absent after grafting1717 cm-1 peak disappearedText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.1 · Fig. S5
ICP-OES Ru/Co molar ratio0.08917Text
Exact Reported
SI text · S-11
ICP-OES Ru/Cu molar ratio0.1097Text
Exact Reported
SI text · S-11
ICP-OES Ru/Ni molar ratioMarked as a best value within this paper0.265:1Text
Rounded Reported
p004 · 3.1 · Section S10/S11
ICP-OES Ru/Ni molar ratio precise0.2648Text
Exact Reported
SI text · S-11
UV-vis Ru(bpydc) absorption peak302 nmText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.1 · Fig. S6
UV-vis Ru(bpydc) absorption peak467 nmText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.1 · Fig. S6
Ni 2p1/2 binding-energy reduction after Ru grafting0.65 eVText
Exact Reported
SI text · S-12 · Fig. S8
Ni 2p3/2 binding-energy reduction after Ru grafting0.55 eVText
Exact Reported
SI text · S-12 · Fig. S8
Ni3(HITP)2 zeta potential20.5 mVText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.1 · Fig. S7A-B
Ru@Ni3(HITP)2 zeta potential-21.1 mVText
Exact Reported
p004 · 3.1 · Fig. S7A-B