Microscopy Morphology — Tailoring of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction performance of 2D conductive Co-catecholate metal-organic frameworks

Measurement evidence

Microscopy Morphology

Tailoring of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction performance of 2D conductive Co-catecholate metal-organic frameworks · T P., Narayana M.L., N․K․ M. et al. · Electrochimica Acta · 2025 · 145343

2 measurement groups · 8 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

SEM, TEM, and HR-TEM

Co-CAT-W · Powder

Thermoscientific Apero S SEM/EDX; JEOL JEM-2100 Plus TEM/HRTEM.

Atmosphere
vacuum microscopy
Context
NMP-associated Co-CAT-W powder
Measurement source
4 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 3b, Fig. 4c-d
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Average nanorod diameter28.6 nmText
Exact Reported
4 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 3b
Average nanorod length133 nmText
Rounded Reported
4 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 3b
Interlayer d-spacing0.33 nm corresponding to (004)Text
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 4b,d
Distance between hexagonal pores1.89 nm for both Co-CATsText
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 4b,d
1D open channel size along c-axisMarked as a best value within this paper1.8 nmText
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 4d

SEM, TEM, and HR-TEM

Co-CAT-WO · Powder

Thermoscientific Apero S SEM/EDX; JEOL JEM-2100 Plus TEM/HRTEM.

Atmosphere
vacuum microscopy
Context
pristine Co-CAT-WO powder
Measurement source
3 · 2.3. Characterization · Fig. 3a, Fig. 4a-b
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Average stub-like feature diameter30 nmText
Rounded Reported
4 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 3a
Average stub-like feature length49 nmText
Rounded Reported
4 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 3a
1D open channel size along c-axis1.79 nmText
Exact Reported
5 · 3.2. Electron microscopy analysis · Fig. 4b