Measurement evidence
Tailoring of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction performance of 2D conductive Co-catecholate metal-organic frameworks · T P., Narayana M.L., N․K․ M. et al. · Electrochimica Acta · 2025 · 145343
Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.
Co-CAT-W · Powder
IRTracer-100 spectrometer; KBr mode; 4000-400 cm-1.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co-O stretching bands | 622 and 537 cm-1 assigned to Co-O stretching vibration | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 4 · 3.1 Structural and vibrational analysis · Fig. 2 |
| NMP-associated FTIR peak | 1639 cm-1 attributed to NMP | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4 · 3.1. Structural and vibrational analysis · Fig. 2 |
Co-CAT-WO · Powder
IRTracer-100 spectrometer; KBr mode; 4000-400 cm-1.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shifted HHTP-related Co-CAT FTIR peaks | 3127 and 1213 cm-1 for Co-CAT-W and Co-CAT-WO | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 4 · 3.1 Structural and vibrational analysis · Fig. 2 |
| HHTP O-H stretching peak | 3189 cm-1 for HHTP O-H stretching | — | — | Text Rounded Reported | 3 · 3.1 Structural and vibrational analysis · Fig. 2 |
Co-CAT-W after OER testing · Electrode
Post-OER characterisation of Co-CAT-W after OER testing; SI figures S1-S3 referenced.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-OER Co 2p1/2 binding energy | ~798 eV | — | — | Text Approximate | 10 · 3.6 Post-OER studies · Fig. S2 |
| Post-OER Co 2p3/2 binding energy | ~782.2 eV | — | ~ | Text Approximate | 9 · 3.6. Post-OER studies · Fig. S2b |
| Post-OER Co 2p satellite peak | 787.3 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6 Post-OER studies · Fig. S2 |
| Post-OER Co 2p satellite peak | 803 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6 Post-OER studies · Fig. S2 |
| Post-OER new Co3+ Co 2p3/2 peak | 781.5 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6. Post-OER studies · Fig. S2b |
| Post-OER new Co3+ Co 2p1/2 peak | 796.5 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6 Post-OER studies · Fig. S2 |
| Post-OER O 1s metal-oxygen peak | 531.4 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6 Post-OER studies · Fig. S2 |
| Post-OER O 1s metal-hydroxide peak | 532.9 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6 Post-OER studies · Fig. S2 |
| Post-OER O 1s CoOOH peak | 529.9 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6. Post-OER studies · Fig. S2d |
| Post-OER O 1s adsorbed water peak | 534 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6 Post-OER studies · Fig. S2 |
| Post-OER Raman Co-OOH peak | 505 cm-1 | — | around | Text Approximate | 10 · 3.6. Post-OER studies · Fig. S3; Table S1 |
| Post-OER Raman Co-OOH peak | 599 cm-1 | — | around | Text Approximate | 10 · 3.6. Post-OER studies · Fig. S3; Table S1 |
| Post-OER Raman Co-OOH peak | 670 cm-1 | — | around | Text Approximate | 10 · 3.6. Post-OER studies · Fig. S3; Table S1 |
| Pre-OER Raman Co-O bending peak | 450 cm-1; bending Co-O bond | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 3 · Table S1 · Table S1 |
| Pre-OER Raman cobalt hydroxide peak | 344 cm-1; Co(OH)2 | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 3 · Table S1 · Table S1 |
| Post-OER Raman Co-OOH band rangeMarked as a best value within this paper | 500-670 cm-1; Co-OOH | — | — | SI Table Range | 3 · Table S1 · Table S1 |
Co-CAT-W · Powder
EDX elemental analysis; XPS on ESCALAB 250 XI with Al K alpha source.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C elemental weight percentage | 71.54 wt. % | — | — | Table Exact Reported | 8 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| Co 2p1/2 binding energy | 797.4 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.4. Surface elemental composition analysis · Fig. 6d |
| Co 2p3/2 binding energy | 781.5 eV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.4. Surface elemental composition analysis · Fig. 6d |
| Co elemental weight percentageMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.77 wt. % | — | — | Table Exact Reported | 8 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| O elemental weight percentage | 27.7 wt. % | — | — | Table Exact Reported | 8 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
Co-CAT-WO · Powder
EDX elemental analysis; XPS on ESCALAB 250 XI with Al K alpha source.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C elemental weight percentage | 71.03 wt. % | — | — | Table Exact Reported | 8 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| Co elemental weight percentage | 0.35 wt. % | — | — | Table Exact Reported | 8 · Table 1 · Table 1 |
| O elemental weight percentage | 28.62 wt. % | — | — | Table Exact Reported | 8 · Table 1 · Table 1 |