Wakamatsu K., Oshima H., Kobayashi N. et al. · Chemistry - A European Journal · 2026
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Both MOF cathodes outperform the H4TTFTB molecular ligand in retained capacity after 30 and 200 cycles in both LIBs and SIBs, consistent with reduced dissolution and framework immobilisation.
Caveat: H4TTFTB control data are literature-derived but presented in matched tables.
7 · 2.2 · Figures S12-S13 · Linked to 7 structured results
DFT single charge-carrier insertion causes only minute cell-volume changes, so the experimentally observed PXRD intensity changes likely involve more complex solvation, ion-pairing, and local disordering processes.
Caveat: Static single-ion DFT does not model full electrolyte/cycling dynamics.
8 · 2.3 · Table S6 · Linked to 5 structured results
Cd2(TTFTB) has higher reported conductivity than lighter M2(TTFTB) analogues because the larger Cd2+ ion compresses pi-stacked TTF columns, shortening S...S contacts and enhancing sulfur orbital overlap.
Caveat: Conductivity value and structure-property argument are cited from previous work [28], not newly measured here.
2 · Introduction · Linked to 2 structured results
TTF-hybrid-MOF delivers the highest SIB maximum and 200-cycle capacities among the tested materials due to combined TTF/bipyridine redox activity and larger 3D ion-transport pathways.
Caveat: Capacity retention is lower than Cd2(TTFTB) despite higher capacity.
7-8 · 2.2 · Table 1/Figure S8 · Linked to 3 structured results
Cd centres behave mainly as structural nodes during charge/discharge; redox chemistry is dominated by TTF units and, in TTF-hybrid-MOF, additional bipyridine contributions.
Caveat: Cd conclusion is based on XANES edge stability.
9 · 2.3 · Figures S21-S22 · Linked to 3 structured results
TTF-hybrid-MOF has the lowest SIB charge-transfer resistance and Warburg impedance among the studied materials, supporting faster interfacial charge transfer and ion diffusion.
Caveat: EIS reflects composite cathode/cell behaviour, not a four-probe electronic conductivity measurement.
6 · 2.1 · Figure 4/Table S3 · Linked to 4 structured results
Incorporating bpea into TTF-hybrid-MOF activates bipyridine-derived redox responses that are absent or weak in the isolated bipyridine ligand.
Caveat: Electrochemical assignment is mechanistic but supported by plateau/CV comparisons.
4-5 · 2.1 · Figure 3/Figure S10 · Linked to 3 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane | Not specifiednone · bipyridine co-ligand | 0D · Pristinemolecular co-ligand/control | 10 · 4.1.4 |
| Cd2(TTFTB) MOFBrowse family: Cd₂(TTFTB) | C34H19Cd2O9.5S4Cd2+ nodes · TTFTB tetracarboxylate linker | unknown · PristineCd-TTFTB framework with pi-stacked TTF columns and shortened S...S contacts | S38 · Table S1 · Table S1 |
| Et4TTFTB | C42H36O8S4none · ethyl tetrathiafulvalene tetrabenzoate precursor | 0D · Unknownmolecular precursor to H4TTFTB | 10 · 4.1.1 |
| H4TTFTB ligand | C34H20O8S4none · tetrathiafulvalene-tetrabenzoate | 0D · Pristinemolecular redox ligand/control | S38 · Table S1 · Table S1 |
| TTF-hybrid-MOF | C43H39CdN2O13S4Cd2+ nodes · H2TTFTB and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane (bpea) | 3D · Pristine{[Cd(H2TTFTB)(Bpea)(H2O)2].DMF.3H2O}n; more three-dimensionally connected framework induced by bpea | 2 · Introduction · Figure 2/Table S1 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane cathoderesearch_0319__mat__mat_bpea | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | electrode for control charge-discharge/CVAl foil | S23 · Figure S10 · Figure S10 |
| 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane powderresearch_0319__mat__mat_bpea | Powder · Pristine Control · Unknown | commercial molecular control | 3 · 2.1 · Figure S10 |
| Cd2(TTFTB) MOF cathoderesearch_0319__mat__mat_cd2_ttftb | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | doctor-bladed electrode diskAl foil | 11 · 4.2.6 |
| Cd2(TTFTB) MOF powder/crystalsresearch_0319__mat__mat_cd2_ttftb | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | as-synthesised and activated for porosity | 10 · 4.1.3 |
| Et4TTFTB red solidresearch_0319__mat__mat_et4_ttftb | Powder · Unknown · Unknown | as-synthesised precursor | 10 · 4.1.1 |
| H4TTFTB ligand cathoderesearch_0319__mat__mat_h4_ttftb | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | doctor-bladed electrode diskAl foil | 11 · 4.2.6 |
| H4TTFTB dark brown solidresearch_0319__mat__mat_h4_ttftb | Powder · Pristine Control · Unknown | as-synthesised ligand | 10 · 4.1.2 |
| TTF-hybrid-MOF cathoderesearch_0319__mat__mat_ttf_hybrid_mof | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | doctor-bladed electrode diskAl foil | 11 · 4.2.6 |
| TTF-hybrid-MOF computational blankresearch_0319__mat__mat_ttf_hybrid_mof | Model · Model System · Model | optimised pristine model | S12 · 3.1 |
| ClO4-inserted TTF-hybrid-MOF modelresearch_0319__mat__mat_ttf_hybrid_mof | Model · Model System · Model | optimised anion-inserted model | S46 · Table S6 · Table S6 |
| Li-inserted TTF-hybrid-MOF modelresearch_0319__mat__mat_ttf_hybrid_mof | Model · Model System · Model | optimised cation-inserted/deprotonated model | S46 · Table S6 · Table S6 |
| Na-inserted TTF-hybrid-MOF modelresearch_0319__mat__mat_ttf_hybrid_mof | Model · Model System · Model | optimised cation-inserted/deprotonated model | S46 · Table S6 · Table S6 |
| PF6-inserted TTF-hybrid-MOF modelresearch_0319__mat__mat_ttf_hybrid_mof | Model · Model System · Model | optimised anion-inserted model | S46 · Table S6 · Table S6 |
| TTF-hybrid-MOF powder/crystalsresearch_0319__mat__mat_ttf_hybrid_mof | Powder · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | as-synthesised; DCM solvent-exchanged for gas adsorption | 10-11 · 4.1.4/4.2.5 |