Electrochemistry Application — Novel CoS2 embedded carbon nanocages by direct sulfurizing metal-organic frameworks for dye-sensitized solar cells

Measurement evidence

Electrochemistry Application

Novel CoS2 embedded carbon nanocages by direct sulfurizing metal-organic frameworks for dye-sensitized solar cells · Cui X., Xie Z., Wang Y. · Nanoscale · 2016 · 11984-11992

14 measurement groups · 31 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Cyclic voltammetry stability

CoS2_4 h CE · Electrode

Three-electrode CV in acetonitrile containing 100 mM LiClO4, 10 mM LiI and 1 mM I2; 50 mV s-1 for 30 cycles

Geometry: three-electrode cell with CE working electrode, Pt foil auxiliary, Hg/Hg+ reference
Context: optimised CoS2_4 h CE
Measurement source: 11990 · Results and discussion · Fig. 8b

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
CV stability over 30 cycles	no apparent current density loss after cycling	—	—	Text Qualitative	11990 · Results and discussion · Fig. 8b

EIS Nyquist plot on CE symmetric cell

Impedance spectroscopy

CoS2_1 h CE · Electrode

CHI 6504C; 10 mV amplitude, 0 V bias, 10^5 to 10^-2 Hz

Geometry: CE symmetric cell
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
R1	63.65 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
Rs	14.11 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

EIS Nyquist plot on CE symmetric cell

Impedance spectroscopy

CoS2_2 h CE · Electrode

CHI 6504C; 10 mV amplitude, 0 V bias, 10^5 to 10^-2 Hz

Geometry: CE symmetric cell
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
R1	4.68 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

EIS Nyquist plot on CE symmetric cell

Impedance spectroscopy

CoS2_4 h CE · Electrode

CHI 6504C; 10 mV amplitude, 0 V bias, 10^5 to 10^-2 Hz

Geometry: CE symmetric cell
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
EppMarked as a best value within this paper	0.410 V	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
R1Marked as a best value within this paper	2.03 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
R2Marked as a best value within this paper	2.18 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
RsMarked as a best value within this paper	13.07 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

EIS Nyquist plot on CE symmetric cell

Impedance spectroscopy

CoS2_8 h CE · Electrode

CHI 6504C; 10 mV amplitude, 0 V bias, 10^5 to 10^-2 Hz

Geometry: CE symmetric cell
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
R1	10.43 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

EIS Nyquist plot on CE symmetric cell

Impedance spectroscopy

Pt CE · Electrode

CHI 6504C; 10 mV amplitude, 0 V bias, 10^5 to 10^-2 Hz

Geometry: CE symmetric cell
Context: Pt reference CE
Measurement source: 11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
R1	2.09 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

EIS Nyquist plot on CE symmetric cell

Impedance spectroscopy

ZIF-67 CE · Electrode

CHI 6504C; 10 mV amplitude, 0 V bias, 10^5 to 10^-2 Hz

Geometry: CE symmetric cell
Context: pristine ZIF-67 CE control
Measurement source: 11985 · 2.4 Characterization and measurement · Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
R1	10^5 ohm	—	—	Table Rounded Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
Rs	16.27 ohm	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2

DSSC J-V under AM 1.5G illumination

CoS2_1 h CE · Electrode

Keithley 2400 source meter; one sun AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm-2

Geometry: DSSC with FTO-supported counter electrode
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Jsc	12.1 mA cm-2	121 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
PCE	5.87%	0.0587 fraction	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

DSSC J-V under AM 1.5G illumination

CoS2_2 h CE · Electrode

Keithley 2400 source meter; one sun AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm-2

Geometry: DSSC with FTO-supported counter electrode
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Jsc	15.6 mA cm-2	156 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
PCE	7.77%	0.0777 fraction	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

DSSC J-V under AM 1.5G illumination

CoS2_4 h CE · Electrode

Keithley 2400 source meter; one sun AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm-2

Geometry: DSSC with FTO-supported counter electrode
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
fill factor	0.66	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
JscMarked as a best value within this paper	16.9 mA cm-2	169 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
PCEMarked as a best value within this paper	8.20%	0.082 fraction	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
Voc	0.73 V	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

DSSC J-V under AM 1.5G illumination

CoS2_8 h CE · Electrode

Keithley 2400 source meter; one sun AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm-2

Geometry: DSSC with FTO-supported counter electrode
Context: MOF-derived CoS2/carbon CE
Measurement source: 11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Jsc	12.8 mA cm-2	128 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
PCE	6.78%	0.0678 fraction	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

DSSC J-V under AM 1.5G illumination

Pt CE · Electrode

Keithley 2400 source meter; one sun AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm-2

Geometry: DSSC with Pt counter electrode
Context: Pt reference CE
Measurement source: 11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
PCE	7.88%	0.0788 fraction	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

DSSC J-V under AM 1.5G illumination

ZIF-67 CE · Electrode

Keithley 2400 source meter; one sun AM 1.5G, 100 mW cm-2

Geometry: DSSC with FTO-supported counter electrode
Context: pristine ZIF-67 CE control
Measurement source: 11985 · 2.4 Characterization and measurement · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
fill factor	0.52	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
Jsc	6.59 mA cm-2	65.9 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
PCE	2.85%	0.0285 fraction	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1
Voc	0.76 V	—	—	Table Exact Reported	11988 · Results and discussion · Table 1

Tafel polarisation / LSV

Voltammetry Tafel and polarisation analysis

CoS2_4 h CE · Electrode

CE symmetric cells; potential range 1 V to -1 V; diffusion limiting current density Jlim compared

Geometry: CE symmetric cell
Context: CE comparison series
Measurement source: 11990 · Results and discussion · Fig. 9, Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Jlim	13.12 mA cm-2	131.2 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
JlimMarked as a best value within this paper	13.77 mA cm-2	137.7 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
Jlim	9.93 mA cm-2	99.3 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2
Pt Jlim	13.08 mA cm-2	130.8 A m-2	—	Table Exact Reported	11989 · Results and discussion · Table 2