Porosity — Nano UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2 MOFs as Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Water-Splitting: A Comparative Study

Measurement evidence

Porosity

Nano UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2 MOFs as Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Water-Splitting: A Comparative Study · Abbas B., Ravindra A.V. · Molecular Catalysis · 2025 · 115025

2 measurement groups · 7 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

N2 adsorption-desorption BET (Quantachrome Instruments version 5.0)

UiO-66 powder, labelled U · Powder

77 K adsorption; degassing time 6 h; type IV isotherm and pore-size distribution from Fig. 5/Table 1.

Temperature
77
Atmosphere
N2
Context
pristine UiO-66 powder
Measurement source
4, 6 · 2.3 Materials characterization; 3.5 BET · Fig. 5; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
major pore size distribution rangemajority of pore sizes range from 1.5 to 2 nmText
Range
4 · 3.5 BET · Fig. 5b
average pore size2.6 nmTable
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 BET · Table 1
average pore volumeMarked as a best value within this paper0.49 cc/gTable
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 BET · Table 1
specific surface areaMarked as a best value within this paper765.9 m2/gTable
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 BET · Table 1

N2 adsorption-desorption BET (Quantachrome Instruments version 5.0)

UiO-66-NH2 powder, labelled U-N · Powder

77 K adsorption; degassing time 6 h; type IV isotherm and pore-size distribution from Fig. 5/Table 1.

Temperature
77
Atmosphere
N2
Context
pristine amino-functionalised UiO-66-NH2 powder
Measurement source
4, 6 · 3.5 BET · Fig. 5; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
average pore sizeMarked as a best value within this paper3 nmTable
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 BET · Table 1
average pore volume0.41 cc/gTable
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 BET · Table 1
specific surface area548.4 m2/gTable
Exact Reported
6 · 3.5 BET · Table 1