Dong S.-F., Cheshideh H., Kongvarhodom C. et al. · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · 2025 · 117142
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
The NiFe-Mn3//rGO BSH is claimed to combine high energy and power density with stable cycling for practical energy-storage applications.
Caveat: Areal energy units are reported as kWh/cm2 and may require downstream unit sanity checking.
10 · 3.3; 4 · Fig. 8 · Linked to 4 structured results
XRD-derived phase percentages show relative trends in MnO2, NiFe-LDH, NiOOH and FeOOH content, but the authors caution that these values are qualitative rather than precise quantification.
Caveat: Low crystallinity, broad diffraction peaks, overlapping reflections and amorphous or poorly crystalline phases can under- or over-estimate components.
5-6 · 3.1 · Table S1 discussion · Linked to 20 structured results
The optimal sheet-like/jagged morphology of NiFe-Mn3 is linked to exposed active sites, electrolyte diffusion, lower resistance and the highest capacitance.
Caveat: Mechanistic assignment is inferential from morphology, impedance and electrochemical performance trends.
7-8 · 3.2 · Table 3 · Linked to 4 structured results
Urea is proposed to control pH and act as a structure-directing agent, promoting smaller round sheets and better morphology in NiFe-Mn3.
Caveat: No-urea SI images/curves were not available in the provided SI text; extracted from main-text summary.
4 · 3.1 · Figure S1 · Linked to 3 structured results
MnO2 incorporation is claimed to improve electronic conductivity of NiFe-MOF by providing conductive pathways for electron transfer and additional redox-active Mn states.
Caveat: No direct electronic conductivity measurement is reported; support is EIS plus compositional evidence.
7-8 · 3.2 · Table 3 · Linked to 3 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery-supercapacitor hybrid device using NiFe-Mn3 and rGO electrodes | NiFe-Mn3 positive electrode || rGO negative electrode, 3 M KOH electrolyteNi, Fe, Mn · terephthalate in NiFe-MOF component | unknown · CompositeAssembled asymmetric device; not a standalone framework material. | 8-10 · 3.3 · Fig. 8 |
| MnO2/NiFe-MOF composite on nickel foam (NiFe-Mn) | MnO2-modified Ni/Fe terephthalate MOF with NiFe-LDH, NiOOH and FeOOHNi, Fe, Mn · terephthalic acid / terephthalate | unknown · CompositeMn salt and urea treatment introduced MnO2 peaks and altered sheet morphology; NiFe-Mn3 is the optimised composite. | 1-2 · Abstract; 2.2; 3.1 · Fig. 2a |
| Nickel-iron metal-organic framework on nickel foam (NiFe-MOF, NiFe) | Ni/Fe terephthalate MOF with NiFe-LDH, NiOOH and FeOOH components reported by XRDNi, Fe · terephthalic acid / terephthalate | unknown · PristineXRD peaks assigned mostly to simulated Fe-MOF and Ni-MOF, with minor NiFe-LDH, FeOOH and NiOOH. | 1-2 · Abstract; 2.1; 3.1 · Fig. 2a |
| Reduced graphene oxide negative electrode | rGO | unknown · CompositeCommercial rGO paste drop-cast on nickel foam for the negative electrode. | 2-3 · 2.3 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| NiFe-Mn3//rGO BSHresearch_0359__mat__mat_bsh_device | Unknown · Composite Sample · Composite | Assembled BSH using NiFe-Mn3 positive electrode, rGO negative electrode and 3 M KOH electrolyte.Ni foam-supported electrodes | 2, 8 · 2.3; 3.3 · Fig. 8 |
| NiFeresearch_0359__mat__mat_nife_mof | Electrode · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Hydrothermally grown on nickel foam, washed with DIW, vacuum-dried at 60 deg C overnight.Ni foam, 3 x 1 cm2 | 2 · 2.1 |
| NiFe-Mn1research_0359__mat__mat_mno2_nife_mof | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | Second hydrothermal MnCl2/urea treatment at 120 deg C for 12 h; 2 mmol MnCl2 . 4 H2O and 0.75 mmol urea.Ni foam bearing NiFe precursor | 2 · 2.2 · Table 1 |
| NiFe-Mn2research_0359__mat__mat_mno2_nife_mof | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | Second hydrothermal MnCl2/urea treatment at 120 deg C for 12 h; 4 mmol MnCl2 . 4 H2O and 1.50 mmol urea.Ni foam bearing NiFe precursor | 2 · 2.2 · Table 1 |
| NiFe-Mn3research_0359__mat__mat_mno2_nife_mof | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Second hydrothermal MnCl2/urea treatment at 120 deg C for 12 h; 8 mmol MnCl2 . 4 H2O and 3.00 mmol urea.Ni foam bearing NiFe precursor | 2, 7 · 2.2; 3.2 · Table 1; Table 3 |
| NiFe-Mn3 without urearesearch_0359__mat__mat_mno2_nife_mof | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | Prepared under same conditions as NiFe-Mn3 but omitting urea; detailed SI values not available in provided text.Ni foam bearing NiFe precursor | 3 · Figure S1 caption · Figure S1 |
| NiFe-Mn4research_0359__mat__mat_mno2_nife_mof | Electrode · Composite Sample · Composite | Second hydrothermal MnCl2/urea treatment at 120 deg C for 12 h; 16 mmol MnCl2 . 4 H2O and 6.00 mmol urea.Ni foam bearing NiFe precursor | 2 · 2.2 · Table 1 |
| rGO negative electroderesearch_0359__mat__mat_rgo | Electrode · Composite Component · Composite | Commercial rGO paste drop-cast on nickel foam.Ni foam · commercial rGO paste particle size 10-20 um stated | 2-3 · 2.3 |