Measurement evidence
Three-dimensional Co/Ni bimetallic organic frameworks for high-efficient catalytic ozonation of atrazine: Mechanism, effect parameters, and degradation pathways analysis · Ye G., Luo P., Zhao Y. et al. · Chemosphere · 2020 · 126767
Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.
Blank control without ozone or catalyst · Model
Atrazine solution held for the same short-term degradation period without ozone and without catalysts.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine removal without ozone and catalysts | 0.1% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
Co-MOF red crystals · Powder
Same base conditions as Co/Ni-MOF catalytic test.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine removed by Co-MOF alone after 20 minMarked as a best value within this paper | 13.1% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4-5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
| Atrazine removal after catalytic ozonation | 67.0% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 | 0.970 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| Apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant | 0.097 min-1 | — | R2 = 0.970 | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| TOC removal | 16.5% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2c |
Co/Ni-MOF brown powder · Powder
200 mL 10 mg L-1 atrazine; catalyst 0.5 g L-1; pH 7; O3 8 +/- 1 mg L-1; gas flow 1 L min-1; 300 rpm; 10 min adsorption then 10 min degradation.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine removed by Co/Ni-MOF alone after 20 min | 9.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4-5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
| Atrazine removal after catalytic ozonationMarked as a best value within this paper | 93.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| Apparent pseudo-first-order rate constantMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.288 min-1 | — | R2 = 0.991 | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| TOC removalMarked as a best value within this paper | 28.2% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2c |
Ni-MOF green crystals · Powder
Same base conditions as Co/Ni-MOF catalytic test.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine removed by Ni-MOF alone after 20 min | 9.6% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 4-5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
| Atrazine removal after catalytic ozonation | 75.5% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 | 0.998 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| Apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant | 0.133 min-1 | — | R2 = 0.998 | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| TOC removal | 20.6% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2c |
O3-only ozonation control · Model
Same base ozonation conditions without catalyst.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrazine removal after ozonation | 47.8% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 | 0.939 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| Apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant | 0.075 min-1 | — | R2 = 0.939 | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2b |
| Atrazine removal with TBA quencher in O3-only system | 15.1% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.5 Mechanism investigation · Fig. 6a |
| TOC removal | 9.5% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 5 · 3.2 Catalytic ozonation activity for atrazine · Fig. 2c |
Co/Ni-MOF brown powder · Powder
UPLC-MS/MS in positive ESI mode; m/z 50-300; Co/Ni-MOF catalytic ozonation at different reaction times.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATZ M+H+ m/z | ATZ m/z=216.1005; 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine; formula C8H14N5Cl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2 |
| CAAT M+H+ m/z | CAAT m/z=146.0225; 2-chloro-4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine; formula C3H4N5Cl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S19 |
| CAIT M+H+ m/z | CAIT m/z=188.0694; 2-chloro-4-amino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine; formula C6H10N5Cl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S18 |
| CDHT M+H+ m/z | CDHT m/z=246.0734; 2-chloro-4-acetamido-6-(2-hydroxy-isopropylamino)-triazine; formula C8H12N5O2Cl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S15 |
| CDIT M+H+ m/z | CDIT m/z=230.0797; 2-chloro-4-acetamido-6-isopropylamino-triazine; formula C8H12N5OCl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S13 |
| CEAT M+H+ m/z | CEAT m/z=174.0538; 2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-amino-triazine; formula C5H8N5Cl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S17 |
| CNIT M+H+ m/z | CNIT m/z=232.0954; 2-chloro-4-(2-hydroxy-ethylamino)-6-isopropylamino-triazine; formula C8H14N5OCl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S12 |
| CVAT M+H+ m/z | CVAT m/z=172.0380; 2-chloro-4-vinylamino-6-amino-triazine; formula C5H6N5Cl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S16 |
| CVIT M+H+ m/z | CVIT m/z=214.0847; 2-chloro-4-vinylamino-6-isopropylamino-triazine; formula C8H12N5Cl | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S14 |
| DAAT M+H+ m/z | DAAT m/z=128.0564; 2-hydroxy-4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine; formula C3H5N5O | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S20 |
| DAIT M+H+ m/z | DAIT m/z=170.1032; 2-hydroxy-4-amino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine; formula C6H11N5O | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S23 |
| DEAT M+H+ m/z | DEAT m/z=156.0877; 2-hydroxy-4-ethylamino-6-amino-1,3,5-triazine; formula C5H9N5O | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S22 |
| DEIT M+H+ m/z | DEIT m/z=198.1334; 2-hydroxy-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine; formula C8H15N5O | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S21 |
| Number of atrazine degradation intermediates/products | 13 intermediates and transformation products detected except for atrazine | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 10 · 3.6 Degradation pathways analysis of atrazine · Table S2; Fig. 7 |
| ODIT M+H+ m/z | ODIT m/z=212.1136; 2-hydroxy-4-acetamido-6-isopropylamino-triazine; formula C8H13N5O2 | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 6-8 and 18-24 · Table S2; MS/MS product ion spectra · Table S2; Fig. S24 |
Co/Ni-MOF brown powder · Powder
Co/Ni-MOF/O3 system varying initial pH, catalyst dosage, ozone concentration and atrazine concentration.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial atrazine 10 mg L-1 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Rate constant at initial atrazine 10 mg L-1 | 0.288 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial atrazine 10 mg L-1 | 93.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial atrazine 20 mg L-1 | 0.996 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Rate constant at initial atrazine 20 mg L-1 | 0.197 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial atrazine 20 mg L-1 | 87.3% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial atrazine 30 mg L-1 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Rate constant at initial atrazine 30 mg L-1 | 0.116 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial atrazine 30 mg L-1 | 68.4% | — | k = 0.116 min-1; R2 = 0.991 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial atrazine 5 mg L-1 | 0.985 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Rate constant at initial atrazine 5 mg L-1 | 0.358 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial atrazine 5 mg L-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 98.2% | — | k = 0.358 min-1; R2 = 0.985 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3d |
| Atrazine adsorption at catalyst dosage 0.2 g L-1 | 5.4% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at catalyst dosage 0.2 g L-1 | 0.99 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Rate constant at catalyst dosage 0.2 g L-1 | 0.266 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Atrazine removal at catalyst dosage 0.2 g L-1 | 93.1% | — | k = 0.266 min-1; R2 = 0.990 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Atrazine adsorption at catalyst dosage 0.5 g L-1 | 8.1% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at catalyst dosage 0.5 g L-1 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Rate constant at catalyst dosage 0.5 g L-1 | 0.288 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Atrazine removal at catalyst dosage 0.5 g L-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 93.9% | — | k = 0.288 min-1; R2 = 0.991 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Atrazine adsorption at catalyst dosage 0.7 g L-1 | 12.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at catalyst dosage 0.7 g L-1 | 0.99 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Rate constant at catalyst dosage 0.7 g L-1 | 0.191 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Atrazine removal at catalyst dosage 0.7 g L-1 | 88.3% | — | k = 0.191 min-1; R2 = 0.990 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Atrazine adsorption at catalyst dosage 1.0 g L-1 | 14.7% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at catalyst dosage 1.0 g L-1 | 0.995 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Rate constant at catalyst dosage 1.0 g L-1 | 0.173 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b inset |
| Atrazine removal at catalyst dosage 1.0 g L-1 | 85.4% | — | k = 0.173 min-1; R2 = 0.995 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3b |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at ozone concentration 12 mg L-1 | 0.99 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Rate constant at ozone concentration 12 mg L-1 | 0.336 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Atrazine removal at ozone concentration 12 mg L-1 | 95.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at ozone concentration 15 mg L-1 | 0.993 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Rate constant at ozone concentration 15 mg L-1 | 0.395 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Atrazine removal at ozone concentration 15 mg L-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 97.8% | — | k = 0.395 min-1; R2 = 0.993 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at ozone concentration 5 mg L-1 | 0.981 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Rate constant at ozone concentration 5 mg L-1 | 0.154 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Atrazine removal at ozone concentration 5 mg L-1 | 79.1% | — | k = 0.154 min-1; R2 = 0.981 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at ozone concentration 8 mg L-1 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Rate constant at ozone concentration 8 mg L-1 | 0.288 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c inset |
| Atrazine removal at ozone concentration 8 mg L-1 | 93.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3c |
| Atrazine adsorption at initial pH 3 | 16.9% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial pH 3 | 0.815 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Rate constant at initial pH 3 | 0.022 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial pH 3 | 29.8% | — | k = 0.022 min-1; R2 = 0.815 | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
| Atrazine adsorption at initial pH 5 | 13.5% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial pH 5 | 0.997 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Rate constant at initial pH 5 | 0.169 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial pH 5 | 84.0% | — | k = 0.169 min-1; R2 = 0.997 | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
| Atrazine adsorption at initial pH 7 | 8.1% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial pH 7 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Rate constant at initial pH 7 | 0.288 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial pH 7 | 93.9% | — | k = 0.288 min-1; R2 = 0.991 | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
| Atrazine adsorption at initial pH 9 | 7.6% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 at initial pH 9 | 0.968 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Rate constant at initial pH 9 | 0.328 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a inset |
| Atrazine removal at initial pH 9Marked as a best value within this paper | 95.7% | — | k = 0.328 min-1; R2 = 0.968 | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. 3a |
Co/Ni-MOF brown powder · Powder
Four consecutive Co/Ni-MOF catalytic ozonation tests under identical base conditions; catalysts filtered, rinsed, dried at 50 C overnight between runs.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dissolved Co fraction of catalyst metal mass after first run | 2.21-2.59% | — | — | Text Range | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4d |
| Dissolved Co after first run | 1.21-1.42 mg L-1 | — | range | Text Range | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4d |
| Dissolved Ni fraction of catalyst metal mass after first run | 1.57-1.85% | — | — | Text Range | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4d |
| Dissolved Ni after first run | 1.24-1.46 mg L-1 | — | range | Text Range | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4d |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 in reuse-series run 1 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Rate constant in reuse-series run 1 | 0.288 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Atrazine removal in first reuse-series runMarked as a best value within this paper | 93.9% | — | k = 0.288 min-1; R2 = 0.991 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4a-b |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 in reuse-series run 2 | 0.992 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Rate constant in reuse-series run 2 | 0.281 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Atrazine removal in reuse-series run 2 | 93.6% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 in reuse-series run 3 | 0.993 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Rate constant in reuse-series run 3 | 0.274 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Atrazine removal in reuse-series run 3 | 93.2% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4a |
| Pseudo-first-order fit R2 in reuse-series run 4 | 0.991 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Rate constant in reuse-series run 4 | 0.272 min-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4b |
| Atrazine removal in fourth reuse-series run | 92.9% | — | k = 0.272 min-1; R2 = 0.991 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4a-b |
| Post-reuse structural retention | XPS showed no significant variation; FTIR characteristic peaks retained; XRD similar peaks retained but weak peaks disappeared. | — | — | Text Qualitative | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. S9; Fig. S10 |
| TOC removal in reuse-series run 1 | 28.2% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4c |
| TOC removal in reuse-series run 2 | 27.5% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4c |
| TOC removal in reuse-series run 3 | 26.5% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4c |
| TOC removal in reuse-series run 4 | 25.0% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · 3.4 Reusability and stability of Co/Ni-MOF · Fig. 4c |
Co/Ni-MOF brown powder · Powder
Zetasizer Nano ZS; Co/Ni-MOF suspension measured at pH 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeta potential at pH 2 | -4.21 mV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. S8 |
| Zeta potential at pH 3 | -11.33 mV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. S8 |
| Zeta potential at pH 5 | -19.67 mV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. S8 |
| Zeta potential at pH 7 | -21.53 mV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. S8 |
| Zeta potential at pH 9 | -30.20 mV | — | — | Text Exact Reported | 6 · 3.3 Influences of reaction parameters · Fig. S8 |