Lu Y., Wang Y., Liu J. et al. · Separation and Purification Technology · 2024 · 128000
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
0.3 NPC is the best photocatalytic hydrogen evolution sample, reaching 14.1 mmol h-1 g-1 with AQY 7.08%, about 61.3-fold higher than pure CdS.
Caveat: No uncertainty or replicated error bars were reported in the extracted main text.
1, 6 · Abstract; 3.4 · Fig. 7a · Linked to 4 structured results
Ni-MOF and PC successfully formed an organic-inorganic hybrid material in 0.3 NPC.
Caveat: XRD evidence for Ni-MOF and Pt in NPC was weak because their peaks were not clearly observed due to low loading.
4 · 3.1 · Fig. 2 · Linked to 4 structured results
Ni-MOF provides high surface area and active sites but has poor electrical conductivity and low electron-hole generation/separation rates.
Caveat: Main text gives this as motivation, with no quantitative conductivity or porosity result for Ni-MOF.
1-2 · Abstract; Introduction
Loading Ni-MOF on PC reduces the apparent forbidden bandwidth to 2.34 eV for 0.3 NPC compared with 2.42 eV for CdS and 2.86 eV for Ni-MOF.
Caveat: Based on authors' Tauc analysis of diffuse reflectance data.
5 · 3.2 · Fig. 4 · Linked to 3 structured results
Pt in NPC functions not only as an electron trap but also as an electron transport channel between CdS and Ni-MOF.
Caveat: No direct electrical conductivity value was reported; mechanism is inferred from XPS shifts and electrochemical/photophysical trends.
4-6 · 3.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3f; Fig. 6 · Linked to 4 structured results
Pt-S bond formation inhibits oxidation of S2- to S on CdS, reducing photocorrosion and supporting 92.6% H2 activity retention after five cycles.
Caveat: Pt-S bond is inferred from Pt(II) XPS; stability claim is supported by photocatalytic cycling but not by post-cycling structural data in the main text.
1, 6-7 · Abstract; 3.4; 4 · Fig. 3f; Fig. 7b · Linked to 3 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CdS nanorods | CdSCd | 1D · PristineCdS crystalline planes assigned to JCPDS No. 41-1049; nanorod/nanoflower morphology. | 2-3 · 2.1; 3.1 · Fig. 2a; Fig. S1 referenced |
| Ni-MOF/CdS | Ni-MOF/CdSNi; Cd · terephthalic acid / BDC | unknown · CompositeOrganic-inorganic Ni-MOF/CdS hybrid without Pt. | 2 · 2.3 · Fig. 1c |
| Ni-MOF | nickel terephthalate MOF, exact formula not reportedNi2+ · terephthalic acid / BDC | 2D · PristineNi-MOF nanosheets; XRD pattern stated to agree with previous reports. | 2-4 · Introduction; 3.1 · Fig. 2b; Fig. 3c |
| Ni-MOF/1 permille Pt/CdS | Ni-MOF/Pt/CdSNi; Cd; Pt · terephthalic acid / BDC | unknown · CompositePt-embedded organic-inorganic hybrid; Ni-MOF nanosheets assembled in CdS nanorods and Pt acts as an electron transport channel. | 1-3 · Abstract; 2.3; 3.1 · Fig. 2c-i |
| 1 permille Pt/CdS | Pt/CdSCd; Pt | 1D · CompositePt loaded on CdS; Pt-S bond inferred by Pt 4f XPS. | 2 · 2.2 · Fig. 1b; Fig. 3f |
| 1 permille Pt/Ni-MOF/CdS | Pt/Ni-MOF/CdSNi; Cd; Pt · terephthalic acid / BDC | unknown · CompositePt-loaded Ni-MOF/CdS prepared after NC formation; control for Pt placement. | 2 · 2.3 · Fig. 7a |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1 NPCresearch_0436__mat__mat_npc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | Ni-MOF grown with varied terephthalic acid/NiCl2.6H2O amount on PC | 2 · 2.3 · Fig. 7a |
| 0.2 NPCresearch_0436__mat__mat_npc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | Ni-MOF grown with varied terephthalic acid/NiCl2.6H2O amount on PC | 2 · 2.3 · Fig. 7a |
| 0.3 NCresearch_0436__mat__mat_nc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | Ni-MOF/CdS prepared by the NPC method without Pt | 2, 6 · 2.3; 3.4 · Fig. 7a |
| 0.3 NPCresearch_0436__mat__mat_npc | Powder · Target Sample · Composite | Ni-MOF grown solvothermally on 1 permille Pt/CdS using 0.3 mmol NiCl2.6H2O and 0.3 mmol terephthalic acid | 2, 6 · 2.3; 3.4 · Fig. 2c-i; Fig. 7a |
| 0.3 PNCresearch_0436__mat__mat_pnc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | 1 permille Pt loaded onto 0.3 NC | 2, 6 · 2.3; 3.4 · Fig. 7a |
| 0.4 NPCresearch_0436__mat__mat_npc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | Ni-MOF grown with varied terephthalic acid/NiCl2.6H2O amount on PC | 2 · 2.3 · Fig. 7a |
| 0.5 NPCresearch_0436__mat__mat_npc | Powder · Composite Sample · Composite | Ni-MOF grown with varied terephthalic acid/NiCl2.6H2O amount on PC | 2 · 2.3 |
| CdSresearch_0436__mat__mat_cds | Powder · Pristine Control · Unknown | hydrothermally prepared CdS nanorods, vacuum dried | 2 · 2.1 · Fig. 2a |
| Ni-MOFresearch_0436__mat__mat_ni_mof | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | standalone Ni-MOF powder; synthesis details not given in main text | 3-5 · 3.1-3.3 · Fig. 2b; Fig. 3c; Fig. 4; Fig. 5b; Fig. 6c |
| PCresearch_0436__mat__mat_pc | Powder · Composite Component · Composite | 1 permille Pt loaded on CdS, vacuum dried | 2 · 2.2 · Fig. 1b |