Application RelevanceSupport assessment: High
Compared with the 6OH-TAC monomer control, Cu-TAC has lower charge-transfer resistance, better self-discharge stability and higher pseudocapacitive contribution, supporting improved lithium-ion reaction kinetics.
Caveat: Some comparative control values are figure-read from SI plots rather than tabulated.
main p.5-6 · Results and Discussion · Figures S27-S30 · Linked to 6 structured results
Application RelevanceSupport assessment: High
Cu-TAC functions as a high-capacity lithium-ion battery anode, delivering 772.4 mAh g^-1 at 300 mA g^-1 with 83% retention after 600 cycles and 0.03% capacity decay per cycle.
Caveat: Electrode contains 20 wt% conductive carbon and 10 wt% CMC; values are for the composite electrode normalised to active material as reported.
main p.5-6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4h; Table S2 · Linked to 4 structured results
Phase AssignmentSupport assessment: High
Cu-TAC is assigned as an unprecedented 2D conductive MOF formed by coordination polymerisation between 6OH-TAC catechol sites and Cu2+ in a planar CuO4 geometry.
Caveat: No CIF file was provided in the assignment; structure is based on PXRD fitting, simulated AA stacking, EXAFS, TEM and chemical characterisation.
main p.2-4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 1b, 2a-b, Table S1 · Linked to 5 structured results
Structure Property LinkSupport assessment: Medium
The triazacoronene-based 6OH-TAC ligand has a lower calculated molecular gap than HHB, HHTP and 6OH-COR, supporting the authors' design rationale for enhanced conductivity.
Caveat: The molecular gaps are DFT comparator values and do not directly equal framework conductivity.
main p.2 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1a · Linked to 4 structured results
Transport MechanismSupport assessment: Medium
Li-ion storage in Cu-TAC involves CuO4, C=N and aromatic-ring active sites, with a proposed three-electron reaction in CuO4 units and ten-electron reaction in TAC units.
Caveat: Mechanistic assignment combines ex situ spectroscopy, DFT ESP and proposed reaction scheme; Cu2+ reoxidation is not recovered within the tested 3.0 V upper cutoff.
main p.7-8 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5i · Linked to 5 structured results
Transport MechanismSupport assessment: High
Cu-TAC shows thermally activated semiconducting charge transport, with conductivity increasing from 298 to 368 K and an Arrhenius activation energy of 0.11 eV.
Caveat: Conductivity was measured by a two-point-probe compressed-pellet method; contact resistance and pellet density are not reported.
main p.4-5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3 · Linked to 5 structured results