Measurement evidence
Triazacoronene-Based 2D Conductive Metal–Organic Framework for High-Capacity Lithium Storage · Yin J.-C., Lian X., Li Z.-G. et al. · Advanced Functional Materials · 2024 · 2403656
Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
Potential range 0.01-3.0 V versus Li+/Li; 1 M LiPF6 in EC/DEC/DMC (1:1:1); Celgard 2400 separator; Ar-filled glovebox with H2O/O2 below 0.1 ppm.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
0.1 mV s^-1 in 0.01-3.0 V vs Li+/Li.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-TAC high-potential CV redox pair | 1.41/1.67 V | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4a |
| Cu-TAC low-potential CV redox pair | 0.48/0.64 V | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4a |
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
1000 mA g^-1 for 200 cycles.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reversible capacity at 1000 mA g^-1 | 687.6 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4c; Table S2 |
| Capacity decay rate at 1000 mA g^-1 | 0.10% per cycle | — | — | SI Table Exact Reported | SI p.22 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Table S2 |
| Capacity retention at 1000 mA g^-1 | nearly 80% after 200 cycles | — | nearly | Text Approximate | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4c; Table S2 |
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
300 mA g^-1 for 600 cycles.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reversible capacity at 300 mA g^-1 after long cyclingMarked as a best value within this paper | 772.4 mAh g^-1 at 300 mA g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4h |
| Capacity decay rate at 300 mA g^-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 0.03% per cycle | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4h; Table S2 |
| Capacity retention at 300 mA g^-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 83% after 600 consecutive cycles | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4h |
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
50 mA g^-1 initial cycles; 0.01-3.0 V vs Li+/Li.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial charge capacity at 50 mA g^-1 | 910.4 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
| Initial Coulombic efficiency | 66.3% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
| Initial discharge capacity at 50 mA g^-1 | 1373.2 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
| Second-cycle reversible capacity | 921.8 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4b |
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
CV scan rates 0.2-1.0 mV s^-1.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b value for oxidation peak I | 0.84 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5b |
| b value for oxidation peak II | 0.79 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5b |
| b value for reduction peak | 0.79 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5b |
| Cu-TAC capacitive contribution at 0.2 mV s^-1 | 69.7% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c |
| Cu-TAC capacitive contribution at 0.4 mV s^-1 | 77.3% | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c |
| Cu-TAC capacitive contribution at 0.6 mV s^-1 | 80.0% | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c |
| Cu-TAC capacitive contribution at 0.8 mV s^-1 | 80.8% | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c |
| Cu-TAC capacitive contribution at 1.0 mV s^-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 84.5% | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.6 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5c |
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
Current densities from 50 to 1500 mA g^-1, then restored to 50 mA g^-1.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rate capacity at 1200 mA g^-1 | 540.8 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 4e-f |
| Rate capacity at 150 mA g^-1 | 780.2 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 4e-f |
| Rate capacity at 1500 mA g^-1 | 510.0 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 4e-f |
| Rate capacity at 300 mA g^-1 | 698.3 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 4e-f |
| Rate capacity at 50 mA g^-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 885.9 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 4e-f |
| Rate capacity at 600 mA g^-1 | 616.9 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 4e-f |
| Rate capacity at 900 mA g^-1 | 569.0 mAh g^-1 | — | — | Text Exact Reported | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figures 4e-f |
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
Nyquist plots for Cu-TAC and 6OH-TAC electrodes.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-TAC charge-transfer resistanceMarked as a best value within this paper | Rct = 85.9 ohm | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | SI p.19 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Figure S27 |
Cu-TAC electrode · Electrode
Cu-TAC and 6OH-TAC half-cells vs Li metal monitored for 10 days.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu-TAC self-discharge stabilityMarked as a best value within this paper | open-circuit potential does not attenuate within 10 days | — | — | Text Qualitative | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure S28 |
6OH-TAC electrode · Electrode
6OH-TAC monomer electrode under similar conditions to Cu-TAC; Figures S25-S28 and S30.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6OH-TAC charge-transfer resistance | Rct = 215.5 ohm | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | SI p.19 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Figure S27 |
| 6OH-TAC self-discharge stability | decreases seriously after 2 days | — | — | Text Qualitative | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure S28 |
| 6OH-TAC oxidation-peak I b value | b = 0.63 | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | SI p.20 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Figure S30 |
| 6OH-TAC oxidation-peak II b value | b = 0.49 | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | SI p.20 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Figure S30 |
| 6OH-TAC reduction-peak b value | b = 0.73 | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | SI p.20 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Figure S30 |
| 6OH-TAC capacitive contribution at 0.2 mV s^-1 | 58.7% | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | SI p.20 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Figure S30 |
| 6OH-TAC capacitive contribution at 1.0 mV s^-1Marked as a best value within this paper | 77.8% | — | — | Figure Axis Rounded Reported | SI p.20 · Supplementary Figures and Text · Figure S30 |