cMOF Evidence Base
Spectroscopy — Conductive Metal−Organic Frameworks for Rechargeable LiOH-Based Li−O2 Batteries

Measurement evidence

Spectroscopy

Conductive Metal−Organic Frameworks for Rechargeable LiOH-Based Li−O2 Batteries · Wu Y., Zhang K., Wang H. et al. · ACS Applied Energy Materials · 2024 · 12027-12035

3 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

FTIR

Infrared spectroscopy

comparative M-HHTP powder set · Powder

FTIR spectra of M-HHTP and HHTP linker.

Context
pristine powder chemical structure
Measurement source
S7 (p007) · Figure S6 caption · Figure S6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
FTIR evidence for coordinationO-H vibration at 3000-3500 cm-1 and C-O near 1224 cm-1 decreased; C-OH bending at 612 cm-1 disappeared.——Text
Qualitative		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S6

High-resolution Li 1s XPS

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

comparative M-HHTP and KB cathode set · Electrode

M-HHTP cathodes after discharge and recharge.

Atmosphere
humidified O2 cycling condition
Geometry
Li-O2 cathodes
Context
cycled composite cathodes
Measurement source
12032 (p006) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure 6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Li 1s discharge products on M-HHTP cathodesDischarged M-HHTP cathodes contain LiOH and byproduct Li2CO3.——Text
Qualitative		12032 (p006) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure 6a-c
NiCo-HHTP recharge product removal by Li 1s XPSMarked as a best value within this paperNiCo-HHTP shows almost complete decomposition of both LiOH and Li2CO3 after recharge.——Text
Qualitative		12032 (p006) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure 6d

XPS

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

comparative M-HHTP powder set · Powder

Survey, C 1s, O 1s, Co 2p and Ni 2p spectra of M-HHTP powders.

Context
pristine powder chemical composition and valence
Measurement source
12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figures S7-S11
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
C 1s C=O binding energy288.3 eV——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S8
C 1s C-C binding energy284.8 eV——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S8
C 1s C-O binding energy285.8 eV——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S8
Co2+ 2p doublet796.6 and 780.8 eV for Co 2p1/2 and Co 2p3/2——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S10
Co3+ 2p doublet799.6 and 783.8 eV for Co 2p1/2 and Co 2p3/2——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S10
Ni2+ 2p doublet873.3 and 855.6 eV for Ni 2p1/2 and Ni 2p3/2——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S11
Ni3+ 2p doublet875.7 and 857.3 eV for Ni 2p1/2 and Ni 2p3/2——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S11
O 1s C=O/C-O component531.4 eV——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S9
O 1s metal-O component533.2 eV——Text
Exact Reported		12030 (p004) · 3. Results and Discussion · Figure S9