Electrochemistry Application — Comparing Ag-O coordinated AgMOF-5 and Ag-N coordinated Ag nanosphere catalytic polymers for real time monitoring of H2O2 level in cancer cells

3 measurement groups · 17 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

AgMOF/GCE · Electrode

Current density versus scan rate for bare GCE, AgMOF/GCE and Ag nanosphere/GCE; double-layer capacitance used as ECSA proxy.

Geometry: modified GCE electrodes
Context: AgMOF/GCE compared against controls
Measurement source: 4-6 · 3.1. Characterization of AgMOF and Ag nanosphere · Fig. 4b

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
double-layer capacitance	2.27 X10-4 F	—	—	Text Exact Reported	4 · 3.1 · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6 referenced
double-layer capacitanceMarked as a best value within this paper	4 X 10-4 F	—	—	Text Exact Reported	4 · 3.1 · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6 referenced
double-layer capacitance	1.8 X 10-4 F	—	—	Text Exact Reported	4 · 3.1 · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6 referenced
current-density versus scan-rate slopeMarked as a best value within this paper	y = 4*10^-4 x + 0.004	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	6 · Figure 4 · Fig. 4b
double-layer capacitance density	0.22 mF/cm2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	2-10 · S2.2 Electrochemical characterization of AgMOF and Ag nanosphere · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6
double-layer capacitance densityMarked as a best value within this paper	0.4 mF/cm2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	2-10 · S2.2 Electrochemical characterization of AgMOF and Ag nanosphere · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6
double-layer capacitance density	0.184 mF/cm2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	2-10 · S2.2 Electrochemical characterization of AgMOF and Ag nanosphere · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6
calculated ECSA	5.6 cm2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	2-10 · S2.2 Electrochemical characterization of AgMOF and Ag nanosphere · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6
calculated ECSAMarked as a best value within this paper	10 cm2	—	—	Text Exact Reported	2-10 · S2.2 Electrochemical characterization of AgMOF and Ag nanosphere · Fig. 4b; Fig. S6

AgMOF/GCE · Electrode

CV response for 5 mM H2O2 comparing bare GCE, AgMOF/GCE and Ag nanosphere/GCE.

Atmosphere: 0.1 M PBS degassed for half an hour with pure nitrogen before use
Geometry: three-electrode cell with GCE working electrode, Ag/AgCl reference and Pt counter
Context: AgMOF/GCE compared against bare GCE and Ag nanosphere/GCE
Measurement source: 5-8 · 3.1-3.2 · Fig. 4c; Fig. 5a

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
5 mM H2O2 CV maximum reduction current	-40 uA	—	—	Text Exact Reported	5 · 3.1 · Fig. 4c
5 mM H2O2 CV maximum reduction currentMarked as a best value within this paper	-78 uA	—	—	Text Exact Reported	5 · 3.1 · Fig. 4c
5 mM H2O2 CV maximum reduction current	-10 uA	—	—	Text Exact Reported	5 · 3.1 · Fig. 4c
power-law b exponent	0.43	—	—	Text Exact Reported	10-11 · S2.2 Electrochemical characterization of AgMOF and Ag nanosphere · Fig. S7

AgMOF/GCE · Electrode

Fig. S8 compares AgMOF casting concentration on GCE by J versus scan-rate slopes; 1 mg/mL selected due to higher ECSA.

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
1 mg/mL AgMOF casting J-scan-rate R2Marked as a best value within this paper	R2 = 0.99	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	11 · S2.3 · Fig. S8
1 mg/mL AgMOF casting J-scan-rate slopeMarked as a best value within this paper	y = 4.02*10^-4 x + 0.004	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	11 · S2.3 · Fig. S8
second AgMOF casting J-scan-rate R2	R2 = 0.95	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	11 · S2.3 · Fig. S8
second AgMOF casting J-scan-rate slope	y = 2.95*10^-4 x + 0.006	—	—	Figure Axis Approximate	11 · S2.3 · Fig. S8