Porosity — Probing the electronic and ionic transport in topologically distinct redox-active metal-organic frameworks in aqueous electrolytes

Measurement evidence

Porosity

Probing the electronic and ionic transport in topologically distinct redox-active metal-organic frameworks in aqueous electrolytes · Shen C.-H., Chen Y.-H., Wang Y.-C. et al. · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · 2022 · 9855-9865

1 measurement group · 10 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms; BET surface area; NLDFT pore-size distribution

Gas sorption and porosity

All powder materials: MOF-808, Mn-MOF-808, UiO-66, Mn-UiO-66, CAU-24 and Mn-CAU-24 · Powder

N2 sorption of pristine and Mn-decorated powders; pore-size distributions calculated from isotherms using NLDFT.

Atmosphere: N2 adsorption/desorption
Context: Pristine frameworks compared before and after Mn installation.
Measurement source: 9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure 4; Figure S8

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
BET specific surface area of CAU-24	1690 m2 g-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure 4
BET specific surface area of Mn-CAU-24	1410 m2 g-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure 4
BET specific surface area of Mn-MOF-808	1150 m2 g-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure 4
BET specific surface area of Mn-UiO-66	1390 m2 g-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure 4
BET specific surface area of MOF-808Marked as a best value within this paper	1900 m2 g-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure 4
BET specific surface area of defective UiO-66	1560 m2 g-1	—	—	Text Exact Reported	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure 4
Pore size distribution centre of CAU-24	centered at 1.2 nm	—	centered	Text Approximate	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure S8
Main pore size of MOF-808Marked as a best value within this paper	around 1.7 nm	—	around	Text Approximate	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure S8
Main pore size range of defective UiO-66 lower bound	1.0 nm to 1.2 nm	—	range	Text Range	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure S8
Main pore size range of defective UiO-66 upper bound	1.0 nm to 1.2 nm	—	range	Text Range	9859 · Results and discussion - Materials characterization · Figure S8