Mohanty A., Kang K.-N., Saravanakumar B. et al. · Small · 2024 · 2308771
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
The H2BDC-80 positive electrode paired with 3D NCF/Cu gives a high-performance asymmetric hybrid supercapacitor.
Caveat: Full-cell cycling retention is lower than three-electrode retention and drops sharply in the first 100 cycles.
main p.8 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4 · Linked to 4 structured results
XRD peak sets for each linker family are assigned to NiCo-MOF formation on NiCoO2@Ni.
Caveat: The paper states the thorough chemical reaction and precise MOF structure are not fully clear; assignments rely on comparison with previous literature.
main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2b · Linked to 4 structured results
H2BDC-80 is the best-performing electrode among all nine samples because its 2D nanosheet morphology offers high surface area, ion access and electron/mass transfer pathways.
Caveat: H2BDC-80 has lower cycling retention than Benzoic Acid-80 and H3BTC-100 in three-electrode cycling.
main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3 · Linked to 4 structured results
Direct binder-free growth of H2BDC-80 on the conductive current collector improves electron transport relative to a slurry-based electrode.
Caveat: Slurry composition and fabrication details are not provided in the supplied text.
main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure S22; Table S1 · Linked to 2 structured results
The main charge-storage process in H2BDC-80 is diffusion-controlled, with b values near 0.5 and 82% diffusion contribution at 5 mV s-1.
Caveat: The kinetic model is electrochemical, not a direct electronic conductivity measurement.
SI p.22 · Charge storage contribution · Figures S23-S24 · Linked to 3 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni (H2BDC-80)//3D NiCu-C@Fe4N/Cu hybrid supercapacitor | NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni//3D NiCu-C@Fe4N/CuPositive electrode Ni/Co MOF plus NiCoO2; negative electrode NiCu-C@Fe4N. · H2BDC in the positive electrode. | unknown · CompositeAsymmetric HSC/supercapattery assembled from binder-free positive and negative electrodes. | main p.9 · Experimental Section |
| 3D NiCu-C@Fe4N/Cu negative electrode | 3D NiCu-C@Fe4N/CuNiCu alloy/foam with carbon-doped Fe4N derived coating on Cu foil. · none | 3D · DerivedHierarchical microporous negative electrode for asymmetric HSC device. | main p.7 · Results and Discussion · Figure 4 |
| Benzoic-acid-linked NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni | NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni; linker benzoic acid (C7H6O2)Mixed Ni2+/Co2+ nodes coordinated to carboxylate linkers; NiCoO2 core on Ni foil. · Benzoic acid, one carboxyl group on benzene ring. | 1D · CompositeCore-shell NiCo-MOF/NiCoO2 electrode; benzoic acid directs nanoneedle/nanorod morphology and reported 1D MOF character. | main p.2 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1 |
| Terephthalic-acid-linked NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni | NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni; linker terephthalic acid / H2BDC (C8H6O4)Mixed Ni2+/Co2+ nodes coordinated to terephthalate linkers; NiCoO2 core on Ni foil. · Terephthalic acid / H2BDC, two carboxyl groups on benzene. | 2D · CompositeCore-shell NiCo-MOF/NiCoO2 electrode; H2BDC directs nanosheet morphology and reported 2D MOF structure. | main p.2 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1 |
| Trimesic-acid-linked NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni | NiCo-MOF@NiCoO2@Ni; linker trimesic acid / H3BTC (C9H6O6)Mixed Ni2+/Co2+ nodes coordinated to trimesate linkers; NiCoO2 core on Ni foil. · Trimesic acid / H3BTC, three carboxyl groups on benzene. | 3D · CompositeCore-shell NiCo-MOF/NiCoO2 electrode; H3BTC directs nanomesh morphology and reported 3D MOF character. | main p.2 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1 |
| NiCoO2@Ni precursor electrode | NiCoO2@NiMixed nickel cobalt oxide on nickel foil. · none | unknown · DerivedHexagonal micropetal-based rose-like NiCoO2 core formed from cross-linked nanoneedle arrays. | main p.2 · Results and Discussion · Figure S5 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benzoic Acid-100research_0708__mat__nico_mof_benzoic_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 100 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Nanoneedle/nanorod average thickness 100 nm. | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S4 |
| Benzoic Acid-60research_0708__mat__nico_mof_benzoic_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 60 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Nanoneedle/nanorod average thickness 68 nm. | main p.2 · Results and Discussion · Figure S4 |
| Benzoic Acid-80research_0708__mat__nico_mof_benzoic_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 80 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Nanoneedle/nanorod average thickness 92 nm; electrode thickness around 27.5 um. | SI p.4 · Figure S6 discussion · Figure S6 |
| H2BDC-100research_0708__mat__nico_mof_h2bdc_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 100 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Not reported. | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S7 |
| H2BDC-60research_0708__mat__nico_mof_h2bdc_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 60 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Not reported. | main p.2 · Results and Discussion · Figure S7 |
| H2BDC-80research_0708__mat__nico_mof_h2bdc_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 80 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Electrode thickness approximately 95 um. | SI p.4 · Figure S6 discussion · Figure S6 |
| H3BTC-100research_0708__mat__nico_mof_h3btc_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 100 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Electrode thickness 35.4 um. | SI p.4 · Figure S6 discussion · Figure S6 |
| H3BTC-60research_0708__mat__nico_mof_h3btc_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 60 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Not reported. | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S8 |
| H3BTC-80research_0708__mat__nico_mof_h3btc_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Solvothermal MOF growth at 110 C for 80 min; ethanol wash; dried at 85 C for 12 h.NiCoO2@Ni / nickel foil current collector · Not reported. | main p.4 · Results and Discussion · Figure S8 |
| H2BDC-80//3D NCF/Cu hybrid supercapacitorresearch_0708__mat__hsc_h2bdc80_ncf_device | Unknown · Composite Sample · Composite | Positive and negative binder-free electrodes sandwiched in 2 M KOH electrolyte; total active area 2 cm2.Split test cell with cellulose separator · Not reported. | main p.9 · Experimental Section |
| 3D NiCu-C@Fe4N/Cu negative electroderesearch_0708__mat__ncf_cu_negative | Electrode · Composite Component · Derived Carbon | Chronopotentiometric NiCu deposition followed by TEG/NaOH treatment and FeCl3/melamine anneal.Copper foil current collector · Not reported. | main p.9 · Experimental Section |
| NiCoO2@Ni precursor electroderesearch_0708__mat__nicoo2_ni_core | Electrode · Pristine Control · Mixed Metal | Hydrothermal product annealed at 350 C under Ar for 1 h.Nickel foil · Not reported for oxide precursor. | main p.9 · Experimental Section |
| Slurry-based H2BDC-80 electroderesearch_0708__mat__nico_mof_h2bdc_nicoo2_ni | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Slurry-coated comparison electrode; binder formulation not specified in supplied text.Current collector not fully specified in extracted text. · Not reported. | main p.5 · Results and Discussion · Figure S22 and Table S1 |