Diffraction Structure — Conductive MOFs as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for all-solid-state Zn-air batteries

Measurement evidence

Diffraction Structure

Conductive MOFs as bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysts for all-solid-state Zn-air batteries · Pan N., Zhang H., Yang B. et al. · Chemical Communications · 2020 · 13615-13618

2 measurement groups · 4 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

crystal-structure assignment from PXRD/model and HRTEM

X-ray diffraction and scattering Transmission electron microscopy

[Ni5.7Ru0.3(HHTP)3(H2O)x]n powder · Powder

Structural description of Ru-doped conductive MOF channels, stacking, and interlayer distance.

Context: pristine mixed-metal conductive MOF
Measurement source: 2 · main text · Fig. 1, Fig. S2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
nanoscale channel diameter	2 nm	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	2 · main text · Fig. 1a
vertical distance between adjacent A or B layers	6.5 A	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	2 · main text · Fig. S2
space group and stacking	trigonal P-3c1; 2D ABAB stacking	—	—	Text Qualitative	2 · main text · Fig. 1

X-ray powder diffraction

X-ray diffraction and scattering

[Ni5.7Ru0.3(HHTP)3(H2O)x]n powder · Powder

XRD comparison of Ni-HHTP and Ru-doped samples using Cu Kalpha radiation.

Context: Ru-doped series compared with pristine Ni-HHTP
Measurement source: 2 · main text · Fig. S3

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
effect of Ru doping on XRD pattern	small Ru doping did not change the characteristic XRD pattern; excessive Ru doping of 10% destroyed the crystal structure	—	—	Text Qualitative	2 · main text · Fig. S3