CaveatSupport assessment: Medium
Acidic conditions may partially decompose Ni3(HITP)2 via protonation of imine nitrogens and ligand dissociation from Ni2+ centres.
Caveat: Presented as a possible explanation for hysteresis rather than direct structural proof of decomposition.
S26 · Supplementary Notes · Figure S4 · Linked to 3 structured results
CaveatSupport assessment: Medium
The fractional H+ order is not explained by increased conductance at lower pH because Ni3(HITP)2 resistance increased as pH decreased.
Caveat: Resistance data show hysteresis and possible partial acid decomposition.
7728 · Results and Discussion · Figure S4 · Linked to 3 structured results
Structure Property LinkSupport assessment: High
Electron delocalisation in the extended conductive MOF lattice is essential for ORR catalysis relative to the Ni(ISQ)2 molecular analogue.
Caveat: Comparison uses a molecular analogue that resembles part of the MOF but lacks the extended lattice.
7730 · Results and Discussion · Figure S11 · Linked to 3 structured results
Structure Property LinkSupport assessment: High
The active site for catalytic O2 reduction in Ni3(HITP)2 is ligand-based rather than metal-based.
Caveat: Based on combined electrokinetic, XAS and DFT evidence; DFT uses finite molecular fragments.
7728-7729 · Results and Discussion · Figure 5, Figure 6 · Linked to 4 structured results
Transport MechanismSupport assessment: High
The rate-limiting step is first-electron transfer and O2 binding to beta-C of the ligand to form a superoxide adduct.
Caveat: Mechanistic assignment depends on electrokinetic interpretation and fragment DFT energetics.
7729 · Results and Discussion · Scheme 1 · Linked to 5 structured results