Chen J.-Y., Weng Y.-X., Han Y.-H. et al. · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · 2024 · 116065
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Fe-HHTP/PGE can simultaneously detect BPA and BPS over 0.01-100 uM with low nM LODs and acceptable recovery in plastic packaging samples.
Caveat: Application was demonstrated after organic-solvent extraction and PBS dilution; human biological matrices were not tested.
10 · 4. Conclusions · Table 1; Table 3 · Linked to 6 structured results
The authors note limitations in morphology control, semiconductive Fe-HHTP conductivity, solvent/pH effects in real samples, and untested human matrices.
10 · 3.8 · Linked to 1 structured result
The synthesised Fe-HHTP had a typical MOF structure with good crystallinity and mixed-valence Fe.
Caveat: No CIF, Rietveld refinement, elemental quantification, or porosity data were reported in the provided main article.
5 · 3.1 · Fig. 1 · Linked to 6 structured results
Coating conductive Fe-HHTP onto PGE reduces charge-transfer resistance and improves electron transfer compared with bare PGE and Fe-HHTP/GCE controls.
Caveat: The paper attributes the effect to conductivity and surface area but does not report a direct BET surface area measurement.
5 · 3.2 · Fig. 2 · Linked to 5 structured results
BPA and BPS oxidation on Fe-HHTP/PGE is mainly adsorption-controlled and involves approximately two electrons and two protons.
Caveat: Electron numbers were derived from Laviron analysis using assumed alpha = 0.5; proton equivalence inferred from pH slopes.
6,9 · 3.3; 3.4 · Fig. 3D-E; Fig. 4B; Scheme 2 · Linked to 6 structured results
Among Fe-, Co-, Ni-, Cu-, and Zn-HHTP controls, Fe-HHTP gave the greatest BPA/BPS current response, attributed to Fe-based electrical characteristics and mixed valence.
Caveat: The comparative metal-control synthesis and numerical radar-plot values were not fully tabulated.
6 · 3.3 · Fig. 3F · Linked to 1 structured result
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Co-HHTPBrowse family: Co₃(HHTP)₂ / Co–HHTP | Co-HHTP; exact stoichiometry not reportedCo · HHTP | unknown · PristineMetal-HHTP control MOF used in sensing comparison. | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |
| Cu-HHTPBrowse family: Cu₃(HHTP)₂ / Cu–HHTP | Cu-HHTP; exact stoichiometry not reportedCu · HHTP | unknown · PristineMetal-HHTP control MOF used in sensing comparison. | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |
| Fe-HHTPBrowse family: Fe–HHTP family | Fe-HHTP; exact stoichiometry not reportedFe, mixed Fe2+/Fe3+ valence · 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene (HHTP) | 2D · PristineConductive iron-HHTP MOF with rod-shaped nanocrystals, ordered lamellar structure, XRD peaks assigned to (100), (130), and (002), and XPS evidence for mixed Fe valence. | 2,5 · Introduction; 3.1 · Fig. 1 |
| Fe-HHTP/PGEBrowse family: Fe–HHTP family | Fe-HHTP on pencil graphite electrodeFe in Fe-HHTP · HHTP | 2D · CompositeComposite electrochemical sensor made by coating Fe-HHTP dispersion on pencil graphite electrode. | 3 · 2.2.2 · Scheme 1 |
| glassy carbon electrode | glassy carbon | unknown · UnknownBare glassy carbon electrode control and Fe-HHTP-coated control substrate. | 2 · 2.1 |
| Ni-HHTPBrowse family: Ni₃(HHTP)₂ / Ni–HHTP | Ni-HHTP; exact stoichiometry not reportedNi · HHTP | unknown · PristineMetal-HHTP control MOF used in sensing comparison. | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |
| pencil graphite electrode | graphite pencil lead | unknown · UnknownBare pencil graphite electrode control and substrate. | 2 · 2.1 |
| Zn-HHTPBrowse family: Zn–HHTP family | Zn-HHTP; exact stoichiometry not reportedZn · HHTP | unknown · PristineMetal-HHTP control MOF used in sensing comparison. | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| bare GCEresearch_0848__mat__mat_gce | Electrode · Pristine Control · Unknown | commercial GCE used as bare control | 3 · 2.2.2 · Fig. 2; Fig. 3B |
| bare PGEresearch_0848__mat__mat_pge | Electrode · Pristine Control · Unknown | washed with distilled water and dried at 60 deg C overnight0.5 mm x 60 mm x 1 mm pencil lead cut to 15 mm | 3 · 2.2.2 · Fig. 2; Fig. 3B |
| Co-HHTP controlresearch_0848__mat__mat_co_hhtp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | control MOF; details not reported | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |
| Cu-HHTP controlresearch_0848__mat__mat_cu_hhtp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | control MOF; details not reported | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |
| Fe-HHTP/GCEresearch_0848__mat__mat_fe_hhtp | Electrode · Pristine Control · Composite | Prepared by the same modification procedure as Fe-HHTP/PGEglassy carbon electrode (GCE) | 3 · 2.2.2 · Fig. 2; Fig. 3B |
| Fe-HHTP/PGEresearch_0848__mat__mat_fe_hhtp_pge | Electrode · Target Sample · Composite | Fe-HHTP/DMF/Nafion dispersion sprayed twice onto pencil lead and dried at 60 deg C for 3 hpencil graphite electrode (PGE) | 3 · 2.2.2 · Scheme 1 |
| Fe-HHTP powderresearch_0848__mat__mat_fe_hhtp | Powder · Composite Component · Pristine Framework | centrifuged, washed, acetone-treated, vacuum-dried at 60 deg C for 12 h, ground to powder | 2 · 2.2.1 · Fig. 1 |
| Ni-HHTP controlresearch_0848__mat__mat_ni_hhtp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | control MOF; details not reported | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |
| Zn-HHTP controlresearch_0848__mat__mat_zn_hhtp | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | control MOF; details not reported | 2,7 · 2.2.1; 3.3 · Fig. 3F |