Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) calibration for imidacloprid
Co-HHTQ-MOF/GCE · Electrode
Co-HHTQ-MOF/GCE in 0.1 M PBS pH 7.0 with increasing IMI concentration.
| Property | Reported value | Normalised value | Uncertainty | Origin and quality | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPV calibration intercept | 2.11 x 10^-7 A | 2.11e-7 A | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · Determination of IMI · Fig. 3B |
| DPV calibration R2 | R2 = 0.990 | 0.99 | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · Determination of IMI · Fig. 3B |
| DPV calibration slope | 5.45 x 10^-6 A/nM | 0.00000545 A nM^-1 | — | Text Exact Reported | 7 · Determination of IMI · Fig. 3B |
| Linear IMI detection rangeMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.4-30 nM | — | — | Text Range | 7 · Determination of IMI · Fig. 3A-B |
| Limit of detection for IMIMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.086 nM (S/N = 3) | 0.086 nM | S/N = 3 | Text Exact Reported | 7 · Determination of IMI · Fig. 3B |
| Sensor sensitivityMarked as a best value within this paper | 0.120 uA nM-1 cm-2 | 0.12 uA nM^-1 cm^-2 | — | Calculated From Reported Rounded Reported | 7 · Determination of IMI · Fig. 3B |
| SI Table S2 current-work method-comparison row | Co-HHTQ-MOF/GCE: LOD 0.086 nM; linear range 0.4-30 nM; measuring technique DPV; Ref. This work | 0.086 nM | — | SI Table Exact Reported | 5 · Comparison of Methods for Detecting Imidacloprid (IMI) · Table S2 |