Conductivity in MOFs
2-3Summarises electronic charge carriers, band versus hopping transport, and conductivity pathways available in conductive MOFs.
Relevance: Core · 2 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs
Bandhana Devi, Sreekumar Kurungot · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · 2024
To review electronic conductivity mechanisms and design strategies for conductive MOFs, summarise ZAB configuration and oxygen electrocatalysis requirements, compare reported cMOF ZAB benchmarks, and identify research gaps for cMOF-based zinc-air batteries.
The review’s argument is preserved as a navigable set of section summaries.
Summarises electronic charge carriers, band versus hopping transport, and conductivity pathways available in conductive MOFs.
Relevance: Core · 2 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs
Frames ZABs as promising aqueous energy-storage devices limited by sluggish ORR/OER kinetics, and positions conductive MOFs as multifunctional porous electrocatalyst candidates.
Relevance: Core · 1-2 · 1. Introduction
Contrasts two-probe, four-probe, van der Pauw, pellet, film and single-crystal approaches and warns that technique choice strongly affects reported conductivity.
Relevance: Core · 4 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs · Table 1
Traces early conductive MOFs from pdt dithiolene networks through M-CAT, BHT, HITP and HHTP systems, with emphasis on conductivity, structure and emerging energy applications.
Relevance: Core · 3 · 3. Recent progress in the development of conductive MOFs · Fig. 1
Identifies synthesis, structural characterisation, material flexibility, binder-free electrodes, anodic issues and mechanism elucidation as main improvement areas.
Relevance: Core · 10-12 · 7. Prospects or areas which need to be highlighted/explored · Fig. 7
Concludes that cMOF ZAB research is still at an initial stage and needs dedicated work to expand and improve the field.
Relevance: Supporting · 12-13 · 8. Summary and future perspectives
Reviews cMOF-based ZAB cathode reports, including Co/Ni-HITP, Co3O4/Ni-Co-HITP, Ru-doped Ni-HHTP, Fe/Ni-BTC, Mn/Fe-HIB, HCF-MOF, Co-CAT/NiFe-LDH/CNFs and CuCo-HITP.
Relevance: Core · 6-10 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2
Defines liquid and solid-state ZAB configurations, primary versus rechargeable cathode requirements, air-cathode architecture, and ORR/OER reaction constraints.
Relevance: Core · 5 · 5. ZAB configuration and mechanism · Fig. 3
Classification systems are attributed to this review and are not treated as a global material registry.
The air cathode is framed as a layered interface combining catalytic, hydrophobic gas access and electronic-current-collection functions.
Categories: Bifunctional catalyst layer · Gas diffusion layer · Conductive current collector
5 · 5. ZAB configuration and mechanism · Fig. 3
Conductive-MOF strategies are organised by charge delocalisation through metal-ligand bonding, extended ligand conjugation, non-covalent pi-pi contact, redox hopping or guest-assisted conduction.
Categories: Bond pathways · Prolonged conjugation · Space pathways · Redox hopping · Guest promoted pathways
2 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs
Fig. 7 explicitly groups the review's outlook into six improvement areas for cMOF application in zinc-air batteries.
Categories: Synthesis · Characterization techniques · Variety or flexibility · Binder free electrode design · Anodic challenges · Mechanism elucidation
12 · 7. Prospects · Fig. 7
Fig. 1 and the associated text arrange conductivity enhancement into intrinsic design before framework formation and extrinsic incorporation after synthesis.
Categories: Pre-synthesis mixed-valence metal ions · Pre-synthesis conductive ligands · Post-synthesis metal clusters · Post-synthesis conducting polymers · Post-synthesis organic molecules · Post-synthesis small conductive species
3 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs · Fig. 1
The review distinguishes delocalised transport through continuous energy bands from hopping between localised neighbouring sites.
Categories: Band transport · Hopping transport
2 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs
The review separates ZABs by electrolyte state and by whether the air cathode is monofunctional or bifunctional.
Categories: Liquid ZABs · Solid-state ZABs · Primary ZABs · Rechargeable ZABs
5 · 5. ZAB configuration and mechanism · Fig. 3
Review-defined families retain their representative materials and conduction descriptions.
Sulfur-rich conductive MOFs based on benzenehexathiol ligands, including Ni and Cu BHT frameworks.
Conduction: Soft sulfur donors are consistent with through-bond conductivity where metal and ligand energy levels are well matched.
Representative materials: Ni3(BHT)2 · Cu3BHT · Cu3(BHT)2 · Pd3(BHT)2
Nodes / linkers: Ni · Cu · Pd · BHT · benzenehexathiol
3 · 3. Recent progress · Table 1
Bimetallic conductive MOFs using smaller or hybrid ligands, including Fe/Ni-BTC and Co/Fe HCF-MOF cathode materials.
Conduction: The review attributes activity to high intrinsic conductivity, redox-active sites, efficient transport routes and cooperative bimetallic interactions.
Representative materials: Fe/Ni-BTC · HCF-MOF
Nodes / linkers: Fe · Ni · Co · benzene tricarboxylic acid · HCF hybrid cobalt and iron based linker set
8-10 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2
Hexaiminobenzene-based conductive MOFs with dual metal centres such as Mn/Fe for flexible solid-state ZABs.
Conduction: The review links quaternary nitrogen to conductivity enhancement and pyridinic/graphitic nitrogen to oxygen-electrocatalysis metrics.
Representative materials: Mn/Fe-HIB-MOF · Cu3(HIB)2 · Ni3(HIB)2
Nodes / linkers: Mn · Fe · Cu · Ni · HIB · hexaiminobenzene
9 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Fig. 5
Conjugated 2D MOFs and coordination polymers based on hexaiminotriphenylene linkers with Ni, Co, Cu or mixed metals.
Conduction: Conduction is discussed through metal-ligand orbital overlap plus pi-pi stacking; active-site identity depends on metal and ligand electronic states.
Representative materials: Ni3(HITP)2 · Co3(HITP)2 · Co3O4/Ni-Co-HITP · CuCo-HITP
Nodes / linkers: Ni · Co · Cu · HITP · hexaiminotriphenylene
6-7 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2
2D layered MOFs containing Ni, Co or Cu and 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexahydroxytriphenylene/catecholate-type linkers.
Conduction: The review attributes conductivity to pi-d conjugation and additional pi-pi interactions between layers.
Representative materials: Cu-CAT · Ni-CAT · Co-CAT · Co-CAT/NiFe-LDH/CNFs · Ni5.7Ru0.3(HHTP)3(H2O)x
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · Co · Ru · HHTP · catecholate
3 · 3. Recent progress
Early conductive frameworks based on 2,3-pyrazinedithiolate units with Cu or mixed Cu/Ni metal sites.
Conduction: Cu(II) d9 sites are interpreted as supporting charge delocalisation better than Ni(II) substitution.
Representative materials: Cu[Cu(pdt)2] · Cu[Ni(pdt)2]
Nodes / linkers: Cu · Ni · 2,3-pyrazinedithiolate
3 · 3. Recent progress · Table 1
Review-level synthesis principles remain separate from primary-study recipes.
Move from powder electrocatalysts fixed with binders toward directly integrated or binder-free cMOF electrodes.
Claimed effects: Would avoid binder-induced conductivity loss, electrode weight increase, energy-density decrease and alkaline binder degradation.
Controlling variables: Electrode-substrate adhesion · Catalyst loading · Electronic contact · Alkaline stability
Representative materials: cMOF-based bifunctional electrocatalysts
Caveat: Presented as an outlook target rather than a demonstrated strategy for most reviewed cMOF ZABs.
12 · 7.4. Binder-free electrode design for the ZAB application · Fig. 7
Select soft donor or fully conjugated linkers such as HHTP, HITP, HIB and BHT to support metal-ligand orbital overlap and extended conjugation.
Claimed effects: Supports through-bond and prolonged-conjugation pathways and can maintain MOF structural features while improving electronic conductivity.
Controlling variables: Donor atom identity · Ligand conjugation length · Chelating functional group · Layer stacking
Representative materials: M-CAT · Ni3(HITP)2 · Cu3BHT · Mn/Fe-HIB-MOF
Caveat: Costly large conjugated ligands and difficult single-crystal synthesis remain explicit limitations.
2-3 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs · Fig. 1
Grow bimetallic MOFs electrochemically on conductive supports as a faster and more scalable alternative to solvothermal synthesis.
Claimed effects: The review presents cathodic electro-synthesis of Fe/Ni-BTC as faster, easier, scalable and less expensive than common hydrothermal routes.
Controlling variables: Metal salt selection · Ligand selection · Current density · pH · Substrate
Representative materials: Fe/Ni-BTC
Caveat: The review gives this as a promising example rather than a generally established synthesis standard.
8 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application
Introduce redox-active or conductive guests into MOF pores after framework formation to enhance electronic transport.
Claimed effects: Can tune conductivity in otherwise poorly conducting frameworks, as illustrated by TCNQ infiltration of HKUST-1.
Controlling variables: Guest molecule redox activity · Pore accessibility · Guest loading · Framework stability
Representative materials: TCNQ@Cu3(BTC)2 · HKUST-1
Caveat: The review separately warns that incorporating conductive additives may block pores and impede electrochemical applications.
2-3 · 1. Introduction; 3. Recent progress · Fig. 1
Use multiple or mixed metal centres to tune electronic states, conductivity and bifunctional catalytic active sites.
Claimed effects: Can improve active-site exposure and tune ORR/OER behaviour, but may reduce conductivity when secondary phases aggregate or disrupt ordered stacking.
Controlling variables: Metal identity · Metal oxidation/electronic state · Metal mixing ratio · Coordination geometry
Representative materials: Co3HITP2 · Ni3HITP2 · Co3O4/Ni-Co-HITP · CuCo-HITP
Caveat: Activity and conductivity are not monotonic with metal content; the review notes detrimental conductivity effects at higher Co content in Co3O4/Ni-Co-HITP.
7 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application
Grow 2D conductive MOFs in situ on conductive or catalytic supports to create hierarchical 3D catalysts with improved electron and mass transfer.
Claimed effects: Combining conductive MOFs with NiFe-LDH/CNF is described as improving active-site exposure and forming better conducting pathways for ZAB cathodes.
Controlling variables: Support morphology · MOF loading · Interfacial contact · Porosity · Active-site exposure
Representative materials: Co-CAT/NiFe-LDH/CNFs
Caveat: Hybrid supports complicate attribution of activity to the MOF itself and may move beyond intrinsic cMOF behaviour.
10 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Fig. 6
These are the review authors’ synthesis, not newly measured results.
The review highlights Fe/Ni-BTC as an example where smaller ligands and metal ions may give more metallic bonding via better electronic wavefunction overlap.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: This is justified by theoretical arguments within the reviewed primary study, not by the review's own calculation.
9 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application
This review limits itself to electronically conductive MOFs rather than proton-conductive MOFs.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: The scope distinction should be preserved when using this source in a broader mixed-conduction chapter.
2 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs
For Co3O4/Ni-Co-HITP, the review attributes bifunctional activity to conductive Ni-HITP plus catalytically active Co-Nx and Co3O4 sites, with acid-washing evidence supporting the Co3O4 role.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The role assignment is review-level synthesis of one report; primary EXAFS/XANES and poisoning data should be consulted for detailed evidence.
7 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application
The review repeatedly characterises cMOF use in ZABs as early-stage, with substantial scope for expansion.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: Reflects the literature state as reviewed in 2023.
10 · 7. Prospects
The review identifies the 2020 Ni/Co-HITP conductive coordination polymer report as the first conductive coordination polymer/MOF ZAB application.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: This is the review authors' historical framing.
6-7 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application
For Mn/Fe-HIB-MOF, the review separates nitrogen roles: quaternary N for conductivity enhancement and pyridinic/graphitic N for onset potential and diffusion-limited current improvement.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: The review does not independently validate nitrogen speciation-function relationships.
9 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Fig. 5
In the Co/Ni-HITP discussion, the review links higher Ni3HITP2 conductivity to ordered stacking and metal-ligand overlap, while Co-rich compositions provide stronger ORR activity but lower conductivity.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: This is a secondary interpretation of one primary study's experimental and DFT results.
7 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application
The review cautions that conductivity values should not be interpreted without considering contact geometry, sample form and complementary electrochemical measurements.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: This caution is especially important for comparing Table 1 values across different measurement techniques.
5 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs
Single-crystal conductivity measurements are treated as more accurate than pellet or film measurements because they avoid grain-boundary and anisotropy complications.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: Single crystals are difficult to grow, so many reported values remain pellet- or film-based and method-dependent.
4 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs
For bifunctional cMOF ZAB cathodes, the review adopts the view that metal-N motifs are mainly linked to ORR activity while metal-O bonds mainly account for OER activity.
Evidence basis: single_reference
Caveat: Presented as a postulate; active-site assignments should be checked in primary studies.
6 · 5.1. Air cathode
Using MOFs as sacrificial templates can improve conductivity and electrocatalytic activity, but pyrolysis destroys or obscures metal-ligand coordination and active-site assignment.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: Useful as a conceptual caveat; primary evidence should be used for individual pyrolysed MOF systems.
2 · 1. Introduction
The review calls for in situ spectroscopy/microscopy and computational studies to clarify ORR/OER mechanisms and guide materials design.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: This is an agenda-setting claim rather than a resolved controversy.
12 · 7.6. Mechanism elucidation · Fig. 7
Key synthesis limitations for cMOF ZAB research include costly ligands, tedious solvothermal methods, low yield, low conductivity and the narrow dominance of 2D cMOFs.
Evidence basis: review_reasoning
Caveat: These are review-level research gaps, not quantitative failure rates.
10 · 7.1. Synthesis
Conductivity enhancement can be approached through pre-synthesis design and post-synthesis incorporation, including mixed-valence ions, conductive ligands, metal clusters, conducting polymers, organic molecules and small conductive species.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review presents strategy classes rather than ranking them for all applications.
3 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs · Fig. 1
The review frames MOF electronic transport in terms of band transport through delocalised continuous bands and hopping transport between localised sites.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: This is a high-level mechanism framing; it does not resolve the transport mechanism of every individual cMOF.
2 · 2. Conductivity in MOFs
Rechargeable ZAB performance is limited by sluggish ORR/OER kinetics at the air cathode, which drives high overpotential and low round-trip efficiency.
Evidence basis: multi_reference
Caveat: The review states this as application context rather than reporting a new electrochemical study.
1 · 1. Introduction
Every row remains visibly secondary and links to a primary dossier only where the mapping is verified.
| Material | Property | Reported value | Context and quality | Primary evidence | Review source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SecondaryCo3(HITP)2 | ZAB specific capacity | 784 mA h g-1 | Table 2; narrative reports 5 mA cm-2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryCo3(HITP)2 | ZAB power density | 164 mW cm-2 | 6 M KOH + 0.2 M Zn(Ac)2 electrolyte; Table 2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryCo3O4/Ni-Co-HITP | ZAB open-circuit voltage | 1.45 V | Rechargeable ZAB; Table 2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryCo3O4/Ni-Co-HITP | ZAB power density | 143.1 mW cm-2 | Table 2; narrative reports 252.8 mA cm-2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryCo-CAT/NiFe-LDH/CNFs | ZAB power density | 112.04 mW cm-2 | PVA-KOH solid-state ZAB; Table 2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryCu3BHT | Electronic conductivity | 1580 S cm-1 | Film; four-probe measurement Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 5 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu[Cu(pdt)2] | Electronic conductivity | 6 x 10-4 S cm-1 | 300 K; measuring technique not specified in Table 1 Table · Exact Reported | research_0201 | 5 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu3(HHTP)2 | Electronic conductivity | 2.1 x 10-1 S cm-1 | Single crystal; four-probe measurement Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 5 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu3(HIB)2 | Electronic conductivity | 13 S cm-1 | Pellet; four-probe measurement Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 5 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCu[Ni(pdt)2] | Electronic conductivity | 10-8 S cm-1 | Film; two-probe measurement; room temperature in narrative Table · Exact Reported | research_0203 | 5 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs · Table 1 |
| SecondaryCuCo-HITP | OER activity E10 | 0.60 V | Table 2; electrolyte not listed Table · Exact Reported | research_0080 | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryFe/Ni-BTC | ZAB specific capacity | 775 mA h g-1 | 6 M KOH electrolyte; Table 2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryFe/Ni-BTC | ZAB power density | 182 mW cm-2 | 6 M KOH electrolyte; Table 2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryHCF-MOF | ZAB power density | 113.5 mW cm-2 | Alkaline polyacrylate hydrogel electrolyte; Table 2 Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryMn/Fe/HIB-MOF | ORR half-wave potential | 0.88 V | Table 2; electrolyte listed as FBN membrane Table · Exact Reported | No verified corpus mapping | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
| SecondaryNi3(HITP)2 | Electronic conductivity | 150 S cm-1 | Single crystal; four-probe measurement Table · Exact Reported | research_0005 | 5 · 4. Conductivity measurement techniques in MOFs · Table 1 |
| SecondaryNi5.7Ru0.3(HHTP)3(H2O)x | ZAB specific capacity | 654 mA h g-1 | Solid-state ZAB; Table 2 Table · Exact Reported | research_0796 | 11 · 6. Conductive MOFs for ZAB application · Table 2 |
Open questions are presented as review-author priorities, not conclusions from the primary database.
Most ZAB-oriented cMOF reports are 2D, while 3D cMOFs with diverse topologies are underexplored.
Proposed direction: Develop 3D cMOFs with high surface area and abundant active sites for multifunctional electrocatalysis.
10-12 · 7.1. Synthesis; 7.2. Structural characterization
Most MOF/cMOF ZAB work targets the cathode, while Zn dendrite, passivation and hydrogen evolution issues remain critical.
Proposed direction: Develop standard protocols and conditions for Zn-anode improvement alongside cathode catalyst optimisation.
12 · 7.5. Consideration of anodic challenges · Fig. 7
Powder-form MOF electrocatalysts require binders that can reduce electrode conductivity, add weight and degrade under alkaline oxidising conditions.
Proposed direction: Design binder-free cMOF-based bifunctional electrodes with robust electronic contact and alkaline stability.
12 · 7.4. Binder-free electrode design for the ZAB application · Fig. 7
Many reported cMOFs still have low conductivity and require better understanding of electron charge transport.
Proposed direction: Use design studies that connect metal/linker selection, stacking and measured conductivity.
10 · 7.1. Synthesis
Conductive MOF synthesis often relies on tedious processes and costly ligands.
Proposed direction: Explore cost-effective ligand choices and user-friendly methods such as mechanochemical synthesis.
10 · 7.1. Synthesis · Fig. 7
Reaction mechanisms and catalyst design principles require better direct monitoring and interpretation.
Proposed direction: Use in situ Raman, X-ray absorption, infrared spectroscopy, in situ TEM and computational studies.
12 · 7.6. Mechanism elucidation · Fig. 7
The ZAB literature has focused on intrinsically conductive MOFs that are difficult to synthesise as well-defined single crystals.
Proposed direction: Explore post-synthetic guest doping and multi-metal MOFs to broaden the cMOF design space.
12 · 7.3. More flexibility in the use of conductive MOFs for ZABs
Single-crystalline structures of most conductive MOFs are not clearly understood, limiting atomic-level structure-property arguments.
Proposed direction: Develop ligands and synthesis methods that produce well-diffracting cMOF single crystals.
12 · 7.2. Structural characterization
Mappings show which printed review references have a verified counterpart in the frozen primary corpus.
| Reference | Study | Role and context | Corpus mapping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. 432020 | Title unavailable | transport_mechanism · measurement_contextCited for broad conductive-MOF transport and measurement framing. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 492021 | Title unavailable | transport_mechanism · review_contextCited as previous review context for cMOF transport and applications. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 582019 | Title unavailable | conductivity_benchmark · conductive_linkerSource of the selected high single-crystal Ni3(HITP)2 conductivity benchmark in Table 1. | research_0005 |
| Ref. 642013 | Title unavailable | conductivity_benchmark · conductive_linkerEarly BHT nanosheet cMOF cited in the progress discussion and Table 1. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 762009 | Title unavailable | historical_development · conductivity_benchmarkCited as the first conductive MOF example and used for a Table 1 conductivity benchmark. | research_0201 |
| Ref. 772010 | Title unavailable | conductivity_benchmark · structure_property_relationshipCited for the mixed Cu/Ni pdt MOF conductivity and the review's Cu(II)/Ni(II) electronic-state interpretation. | research_0203 |
| Ref. 782012 | Title unavailable | conductivity_benchmark · conductive_linkerCited for HHTP/CAT 2D layered MOFs and the selected Cu3(HHTP)2 conductivity benchmark. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 812014 | Title unavailable | guest_promoted_conductivity · synthesis_strategyCited for post-synthetic TCNQ guest tuning of HKUST-1 conductivity. | research_0088 |
| Ref. 852020 | Title unavailable | measurement_contextCited for specialised review discussion of conductivity measurement techniques and method limitations. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 892017 | Title unavailable | conductivity_benchmarkReference for multiple pellet four-point HHTP family conductivities in Table 1. | research_0079 |
| Ref. 902017 | Title unavailable | conductivity_benchmarkReference for HIB-family conductivity values in Table 1. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 912020 | Title unavailable | conductivity_benchmark · conductive_linkerSource of the very high Cu3BHT film conductivity listed in Table 1. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1062023 | Title unavailable | binder_free_electrode_context · anode_contextCited in the review's outlook on anodic challenges and binder-related electrode issues. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1102020 | Title unavailable | zab_benchmark · historical_development · structure_property_relationshipFirst cMOF/conductive coordination polymer ZAB application as framed by the review, with Table 2 power and capacity benchmarks. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1112022 | Title unavailable | zab_benchmark · active_site_assignmentSource for Co3O4/Ni-Co-HITP bifunctional activity, active-site interpretation and ZAB device metrics. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1122020 | Title unavailable | zab_benchmark · doped_cmoFRu-doped HHTP conductive MOF used for bifunctional electrocatalysis and solid-state ZAB in Fig. 4 and Table 2. | research_0796 |
| Ref. 1132020 | Title unavailable | zab_benchmark · synthesis_strategyElectrochemical synthesis example and high-performing Fe/Ni-BTC ZAB benchmark in Table 2. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1142019 | Title unavailable | zab_benchmark · solid_state_zab · structure_property_relationshipFlexible solid-state ZAB example using Mn/Fe-HIB-MOF and a bio-cellulose electrolyte. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1152020 | Title unavailable | zab_benchmark · bimetallic_cmoFBimetallic Co/Fe HCF-MOF ZAB example with hydrogel electrolyte power-density benchmark. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1162022 | Title unavailable | zab_benchmark · hybrid_3d_catalyst · synthesis_strategyHybrid 3D cMOF/NiFe-LDH/carbon-nanofibre catalyst for OER and solid-state rechargeable ZAB benchmarking. | Unmapped |
| Ref. 1202023 | Title unavailable | orr_oer_benchmark · bimetallic_cmoFRecent CuCo-HITP ORR/OER electrocatalysis example included for ZAB application scope. | research_0080 |