Microscopy Morphology — Drawing sensors with ball-milled blends of metal-organic frameworks and graphite

Measurement evidence

Microscopy Morphology

Drawing sensors with ball-milled blends of metal-organic frameworks and graphite · Ko M., Aykanat A., Smith M.K. et al. · Sensors (Switzerland) · 2017 · 2192

2 measurement groups · 4 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

SEM and EDS mapping

Scanning electron microscopy Elemental microanalysis and mapping

Cu3HHTP2/graphite blended pellet · Pellet

SEM and EDS comparison of pure Cu3HHTP2, graphite and Cu3HHTP2/graphite blend; broader blend-family morphology discussed

Atmosphere: vacuum/SEM
Geometry: powder/blend
Context: pristine and MOF/graphite composite comparison
Measurement source: 7 of 17 · Results 3.2 · Figure 2; Figures S5-S7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
M3HHTP2/graphite blended particle and sheet size range	0.1-8 um	—	—	Text Range	6 of 17 · Results 3.2 · Figure 2
graphite sheet lateral size before blending	6-12 um	—	—	Text Range	6 of 17 · Results 3.2 · Figure 2
MOF crystallite aggregate cluster size before blending	2-3 um	—	—	Text Range	6 of 17 · Results 3.2 · Figure 2

optical-image/ImageJ film-thickness calculation

paper chip with four M3HHTP2/graphite blends · Electrode

abraded layers on paper chips; areas, mass and density used in calculation according to Table S4 caption

Atmosphere: ambient
Geometry: paper chip with Au electrodes
Context: MOF/graphite composite devices
Measurement source: S15-S16 · X. Estimation of Thickness of the Abrasion Layer · Table S4; Figure S12

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
average abraded blend film thickness on paper chips	0.4 um	—	—	SI Table Exact Reported	S15-S16 · X. Estimation of Thickness of the Abrasion Layer · Table S4