Microscopy Morphology — The Growth Mechanism of a Conductive MOF Thin Film in Spray-based Layer-by-layer Liquid Phase Epitaxy

Measurement evidence

Microscopy Morphology

The Growth Mechanism of a Conductive MOF Thin Film in Spray-based Layer-by-layer Liquid Phase Epitaxy · Zheng R., Fu Z.-H., Deng W.-H. et al. · Angewandte Chemie - International Edition · 2022 · e202212797

3 measurement groups · 11 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

AFM topography and statistical grain/roughness analysis

Cu3(HHTP)2-xC spray LBL-LPE thin-film growth-cycle series, x = 1-60 · Thin Film

Bruker Dimension ICON AFM, ScanAsyst in air mode; cantilever spring constant 0.4 N/m; setpoint 0.02 +/- 0.005 V; scan rate 1 Hz; 256 lines.

Atmosphere
air
Geometry
500 nm x 500 nm AFM images in Figures 1 and S4; cross-sectional AFM in Figure S5
Context
pristine Cu3(HHTP)2-xC growth-cycle series
Measurement source
p003 · 1.1 Materials and General Methods · Figures 1, 2a-b, S4, S5
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Cu3(HHTP)2-1C average roughness Raapproximately 0.7 nm7e-10 mapproximatelyText
Approximate
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1b; Figure 2a
Cu3(HHTP)2-2C average roughness Ra2.47 nm2.47e-9 mText
Exact Reported
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1c; Figure 2a
surface grain transverse diameter during growthmost grain size < 40 nm; surface grain restricted to < 40 nm in each cycle4e-8 mupper-bound descriptorText
Approximate
p002-p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 1; Figure 2b
Cu3(HHTP)2-xC roughness for x = 4-20approximately 2.2 nm with little fluctuation2.2e-9 mapproximatelyText
Approximate
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2a
blank substrate average roughness Ra0.3 nm3e-10 mText
Rounded Reported
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2a
Cu3(HHTP)2-1C thickness from S5 labelslabels 2.06, 2.01, 2.27, 2.42 and 2.15 nm; average about 2.18 nm2.18e-9 mspread across five labelled line profilesVisual Estimate
Approximate
p008 · 2. Figures · Figure S5
Cu3(HHTP)2-20C thickness from S5 labelslabels 38.0, 38.8, 38.2, 38.5 and 38.3 nm; average about 38.4 nm3.84e-8 mspread across five labelled line profilesVisual Estimate
Approximate
p008 · 2. Figures · Figure S5
homogeneous thickness growth rateapproximately 2 nm per cycleapproximatelyText
Approximate
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2a; Figure S5

SEM cross-sectional imaging

Cu3(HHTP)2-xC spray LBL-LPE thin-film growth-cycle series, x = 1-60 · Thin Film

Zeiss Sigma 300 field-emission SEM at 3 kV; cross-sectional views for x = 10, 20, 30 and 50 in SI.

Geometry
thin-film cross sections; Figure 2c shows 20C, Figure S7 shows 10C/20C/30C/50C
Context
pristine Cu3(HHTP)2-xC thin films
Measurement source
p003 · 1.1 Materials and General Methods · Figure 2c; Figure S7
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
cross-sectional morphologydense bottom and rough top profile; dense-bottom proportion increases with growth cycleText
Qualitative
p003 · Results and Discussion · Figure 2c; Figure S7

HR-TEM imaging with FFT analysis

Cu3(HHTP)2-30C peeled-film TEM slice · Thin Film

FEI TALOS F200X G2 field-emission TEM at 200 kV and 200 pm electron beam current; beam perpendicular to peeled slices.

Geometry
peeled Cu3(HHTP)2-30C thin-film slices; thicker rough top and thinner smooth bottom regions
Context
pristine 30-cycle Cu3(HHTP)2 film
Measurement source
p004 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3d-f; Figures S11-S12
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
30C thinner slice bottom-region orientationbright FFT diffraction points divided into a few hexagonal lattice point sets; bottom part has preferred orientation in the ab plane and fused mesocrystal structureText
Qualitative
p004 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3e-f; Figure S12
30C thicker slice top-region FFT assignmentdiffraction cycles/rings of (hk0); none of (00l) found; polycrystal nature and oriented growth along (00l) directionText
Qualitative
p004 · Results and Discussion · Figure 3d; Figure S11