Sensing Application — A Sensing Platform Based on Ni/Mn Bimetal-Organic Framework for Electrochemical Detection of Osimertinib

Measurement evidence

Sensing Application

A Sensing Platform Based on Ni/Mn Bimetal-Organic Framework for Electrochemical Detection of Osimertinib · Karazan Z.M., Roushani M. · Electrocatalysis · 2024 · 110-119

7 measurement groups · 34 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Amperometry calibration

Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE · Electrode

0.1 M NaOH with successive OSIM additions; constant potential +0.36 V; calibration over 0.5-800 uM and 800-1800 uM; n = 4.

Atmosphere
not reported
Geometry
Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE working electrode
Context
MOF-modified composite electrode
Measurement source
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6A-B
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
First amperometric linear range upper bound800 uMText
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
First amperometric linear range lower bound0.5 uMText
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Second amperometric linear range upper bound1800 uMText
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Second amperometric linear range lower bound800 uMText
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Amperometric operating potential+0.36 VCaption
Exact Reported
p008 · Figure caption · Fig. 6
Calibration intercept for 0.5-800 uM OSIM10.541 uAText
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Calibration intercept for 800-1800 uM OSIM99.15 uAText
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Calibration R2 for 0.5-800 uM OSIMR2 = 0.9985Text
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Calibration R2 for 800-1800 uM OSIMR2 = 0.9916Text
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Calibration slope for 0.5-800 uM OSIMMarked as a best value within this paperI (uA) = 0.1663 [OSIM] (uM) + 10.541Text
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
Calibration slope for 800-1800 uM OSIMI (uA) = 0.055 [OSIM] (uM) + 99.15Text
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B
OSIM limit of detectionMarked as a best value within this paperLOD = 0.16 uM (S/N = 3)S/N = 3Text
Exact Reported
p008 · Amperometric Sensing of OSIM on MOF/GCE · Fig. 6B

Cyclic voltammetry concentration series

Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE · Electrode

CV responses of Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE with OSIM additions from 0 to 0.05 mM in 0.1 M NaOH.

Atmosphere
not reported
Geometry
Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE working electrode
Context
MOF-modified composite electrode
Measurement source
p006-p007 · Cyclic Voltammetric Responses of OSIM · Fig. 5D
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
CV OSIM concentration-series maximum0 to 0.05 mM OSIM50 uMCaption
Exact Reported
p006-p007 · Cyclic Voltammetric Responses of OSIM · Fig. 5D

Amperometric repeatability

Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE · Electrode

Five consecutive amperometric measurements of 40 uM OSIM using one Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE at +0.36 V; n = 3.

Atmosphere
not reported
Geometry
single modified GCE
Context
MOF-modified composite electrode
Measurement source
p008-p009 · Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Stability of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 8B
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Number of repeatability measurementsfive repetitive OSIM amperometric signalsCaption
Exact Reported
p009 · Figure caption · Fig. 8B
Repeatability RSD on one electrodeRSD = 2.9%Text
Exact Reported
p008 · Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Stability of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 8B

Amperometric reproducibility

Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE · Electrode

Five separately prepared Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE electrodes tested toward 60 uM OSIM in NaOH at +0.36 V; n = 3.

Atmosphere
not reported
Geometry
five modified GCEs
Context
MOF-modified composite electrode
Measurement source
p008-p009 · Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Stability of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 8A
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Number of electrodes in reproducibility testfive Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE electrodesCaption
Exact Reported
p009 · Figure caption · Fig. 8A
Reproducibility RSD across five electrodesRSD = 2.7%Text
Exact Reported
p008-p009 · Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Stability of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 8A

Amperometric interference/selectivity test

Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE · Electrode

0.1 mM OSIM and tenfold concentrations of gefitinib, ibrutinib, vandetanib, apixaban, riboflavin and tryptophan in 0.1 M NaOH at +0.36 V; n = 3.

Atmosphere
not reported
Geometry
Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE working electrode
Context
MOF-modified composite electrode
Measurement source
p008 · Selectivity of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 7
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Interferent responseinterference analyte additions gave insignificant responses compared with OSIM oxidationText
Qualitative
p008 · Selectivity of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 7
Interferent concentration ratiotenfold concentration of GF, IB, VA, AP, RF and TrpText
Exact Reported
p008 · Selectivity of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 7
Selectivity-test OSIM concentration0.1 mM OSIM100 uM OSIMCaption
Exact Reported
p008 · Figure caption · Fig. 7

Standard addition amperometry in blood serum

Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE · Electrode

Blood serum ultrafiltered at 5000 rpm for 20 min; OSIM standards spiked every 50 s in 0.1 M NaOH; amperometry at +0.36 V; n = 3.

Atmosphere
not reported
Geometry
Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE working electrode
Context
MOF-modified composite electrode in real-sample matrix
Measurement source
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Fig. 9; Table 1
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Serum recovery range maximum101.71%Text
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum recovery range minimum98%Text
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum RSD upper boundRSD lower than 1.31%upper boundText
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 1 OSIM foundAdded 0.00 uM; found not detectedTable
Qualitative
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 2 OSIM foundAdded 0.50 uM; found 0.49 uM; recovery 98.00%; RSD 1.03%RSD 1.03%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 2 recovery98.00%RSD 1.03%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 3 OSIM foundAdded 2.00 uM; found 2.51 uM; recovery 100.40%; RSD 0.87%RSD 0.87%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 3 recovery100.40%RSD 0.87%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 4 OSIM foundAdded 5.00 uM; found 7.49 uM; recovery 99.86%; RSD 1.31%RSD 1.31%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 4 recovery99.86%RSD 1.31%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 5 OSIM foundAdded 10.00 uM; found 17.8 uM; recovery 101.71%; RSD 0.94%RSD 0.94%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1
Serum sample 5 recovery101.71%RSD 0.94%Table
Exact Reported
p009 · MOF/GCE Performance in the Actual Sample · Table 1

Amperometric long-term stability

Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE · Electrode

30 uM OSIM in NaOH at +0.36 V; current monitored for 35 min; n = 3.

Atmosphere
not reported
Geometry
Ni/Mn-MOF/GCE working electrode
Context
MOF-modified composite electrode
Measurement source
p008-p009 · Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Stability of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 8C
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
Current retained after long-term stability testalmost 96% after 35 minalmostText
Approximate
p008 · Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Stability of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 8C
Long-term stability duration35 minText
Exact Reported
p008 · Reproducibility, Repeatability, and Stability of the MOF/GCE · Fig. 8C