Wang X., Shen X., Zhang Y.-J. et al. · Inorganic Chemistry Communications · 2013 · 45-49
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
Both compounds show high decomposition temperatures, which the authors describe as advantageous for semiconducting ability.
Caveat: Decomposition temperatures are reported in SI captions; additional DSC event labels are read from rendered SI figures without ramp-rate/atmosphere metadata.
2 · Structure discussion · Linked to 4 structured results
No porosity, thermoelectric figure-of-merit, Seebeck coefficient, electrochemical result values, gas sorption measurements, or application-device performance values were reported for the conductive frameworks in the supplied documents.
Caveat: The main text mentions electrochemical measurements on discrete compounds only as indirect analysis, without extractable values.
2 · Conductivity discussion
The face-to-face/back-to-back stacked tmtaa arrangement and short bridging ligands are proposed to support the notable conductivities.
Caveat: The conductivity is measured on pellets, while the detailed stacking analysis comes from single-crystal structures.
3 · Structure-property discussion · Fig. 1 · Linked to 4 structured results
The roughly three-order higher conductivity of compound 2 is attributed to protonic conduction associated with hydroxyl groups on the bridging ligand.
Caveat: The claim is inferential; the paper does not report separate humidity-dependent or isotope-effect proton-conduction experiments.
3 · Conductivity discussion · Linked to 2 structured results
Compounds 1 and 2 show semiconductor-like charge transport because conductivity rises with increasing temperature over 200-300 K.
Caveat: Device geometry and environmental details are sparse; trend is from pressed-pellet powder compactions.
2 · Conductivity discussion · Fig. 4 · Linked to 4 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| compound 1, [Ge(tmtaa)(1,4-bdc)]n | [Ge(tmtaa)(1,4-bdc)]n; C32H30GeN4O5 including 0.5 ethyl acetate per tmtaa unit in the reported crystal formulaGe(IV) centres in Ge(tmtaa) units · tmtaa = tetraaza[14]annulene; 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate (1,4-bdc) | 1D · PristineTriclinic P-1 one-dimensional stepwise coordination polymer chain. | 1 · Abstract |
| compound 2, [Ge(tmtaa)(2,5-dh-1,4-bdc)]n | [Ge(tmtaa)(2,5-dihydroxyl-1,4-bdc)]n; C34H34GeN4O8 including one ethyl acetate per tmtaa unit in the reported crystal formulaGe(IV) centres in Ge(tmtaa) units · tmtaa = tetraaza[14]annulene; 2,5-dihydroxyl-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate | 1D · PristineTriclinic P-1 one-dimensional stepwise coordination polymer chain. | 1 · Abstract |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| pressed-pellet powder compaction of compound 1research_0307__mat__mat_1_ge_tmtaa_bdc | Pellet · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Bulk powder pressed into pellet for four-probe DC conductivity. | 2 · Conductivity discussion · Fig. 4 |
| compound 1 orange single crystalsresearch_0307__mat__mat_1_ge_tmtaa_bdc | Single Crystal · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | As-synthesised by solution layering; crystals contain ethyl acetate solvate. | 4 · Reference 31 |
| pressed-pellet powder compaction of compound 2research_0307__mat__mat_2_ge_tmtaa_dhbdc | Pellet · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | Bulk powder pressed into pellet for four-probe DC conductivity. | 2 · Conductivity discussion · Fig. 4 |
| compound 2 orange single crystalsresearch_0307__mat__mat_2_ge_tmtaa_dhbdc | Single Crystal · Target Sample · Pristine Framework | As-synthesised by method similar to compound 1; crystals contain ethyl acetate solvate. | 4 · Reference 32 |