Spectroscopy — Discovery of Dual Ion-Electron Conductivity of Metal-Organic Frameworks via Machine Learning-Guided Experimentation

Measurement evidence

Spectroscopy

Discovery of Dual Ion-Electron Conductivity of Metal-Organic Frameworks via Machine Learning-Guided Experimentation · Bashiri R., Lawson P.S., He S. et al. · Chemistry of Materials · 2025 · 1143-1153

6 measurement groups · 12 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) with Tauc-plot band-gap extraction

MOF 1 as-synthesised crystals/pellet · Pellet

ASD Quality Spec Pro UV-vis, 350-2500 nm; Eg extrapolated from (F(R) hv)^2 versus hv.

Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
1148 · 4.2.2 Optical and Electrical Properties · Figure 5a
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
MOF 1 optical band gap1.4 eVText
Rounded Reported
1148 · 4.2.2 Optical and Electrical Properties · Figure 5a

FTIR spectroscopy

MOF 1 as-synthesised crystals/pellet · Pellet

ThermoFisher Nicolet FTIR, 4000-400 cm-1.

Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figure S6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
FTIR C=O and N-H bands vanish on MOF formationC=O 1680 cm-1 and N-H 3270 cm-1 vanishText
Exact Reported
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figure S6

XPS with Al Kalpha source and CasaXPS fitting

MOF 1 as-synthesised crystals/pellet · Pellet

Binding energies calibrated to C 1s at 285.0 eV; Shirley background and mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian line shapes.

Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figures S7-S8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
MOF 1 Cu(0) deconvolution area54.12 %AreaVisual Estimate
Approximate
S10-S11 · FTIR and XPS of 1 and 2 · Figures S7-S8
MOF 1 XPS Cu(0) 2p3/2 peak932.88 eVText
Exact Reported
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figure S8
MOF 1 XPS Cu atomic percent8.65 at%Visual Estimate
Approximate
S10-S11 · FTIR and XPS of 1 and 2 · Figures S7-S8
MOF 1 Cu(II) deconvolution area45.88 %AreaVisual Estimate
Approximate
S10-S11 · FTIR and XPS of 1 and 2 · Figures S7-S8

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) with Tauc-plot band-gap extraction

MOF 2 as-synthesised crystals/pellet · Pellet

ASD Quality Spec Pro UV-vis, 350-2500 nm; Eg extrapolated from (F(R) hv)^2 versus hv.

Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
1148 · 4.2.2 Optical and Electrical Properties · Figure 5a
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
MOF 2 optical band gap1.38 eVText
Exact Reported
1148 · 4.2.2 Optical and Electrical Properties · Figure 5a

FTIR spectroscopy

MOF 2 as-synthesised crystals/pellet · Pellet

ThermoFisher Nicolet FTIR, 4000-400 cm-1.

Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figure S6
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
FTIR C-O and C-N aromatic stretching bands1050 and 1280 cm-1Text
Exact Reported
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figure S6

XPS with Al Kalpha source and CasaXPS fitting

MOF 2 as-synthesised crystals/pellet · Pellet

Binding energies calibrated to C 1s at 285.0 eV; Shirley background and mixed Gaussian-Lorentzian line shapes.

Context
pristine framework
Measurement source
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figures S7-S8
PropertyReported valueNormalised valueUncertaintyOrigin and qualitySource
MOF 2 Cu(0) deconvolution area10.41 %AreaVisual Estimate
Approximate
S10-S11 · FTIR and XPS of 1 and 2 · Figures S7-S8
MOF 2 XPS Cu(0) 2p3/2 peak932.70 eVText
Exact Reported
1148 · 4.2.1 Structural and Compositional Characterization · Figure S8
MOF 2 XPS Cu atomic percent7.76 at%Visual Estimate
Approximate
S10-S11 · FTIR and XPS of 1 and 2 · Figures S7-S8
MOF 2 Cu(II) deconvolution area89.59 %AreaVisual Estimate
Approximate
S10-S11 · FTIR and XPS of 1 and 2 · Figures S7-S8