Lai X., Liu Y., Yang G. et al. · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · 2017 · 9611-9617
Open a family to keep every result attached to its sample, method and conditions.
Paraphrased for this database from the authors’ stated interpretations — never quoted verbatim — and kept separate from reported measurements.
HPW can be selectively located in larger cages, smaller cages, or both cage types of MIL-101 by impregnation, one-pot loading, and leaching strategies.
Caveat: Some pore-size distribution and FTIR support is in SI rendered-page figures, but numerical values and interpretations are reported in the main text.
main p.4 · Results and discussion · Fig. S5 · Linked to 5 structured results
A linear HPW-mediated proton-conducting pathway in MIL-101 enables faster proton transport than the zigzag pathway.
Caveat: Primary conductivity values are exact main-text/table values; supporting matched-loading plot is in SI rendered-page Fig. S9.
main p.4 · Results and discussion · Linked to 4 structured results
TETA provides the optimum polyamine length/loading balance for sample 3, whereas longer TEPA is hindered in the confined pores.
Caveat: The steric explanation is inferred by the authors from conductivity trends and molecular sizes.
main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 · Linked to 5 structured results
Activation energies of the HPW/MIL-101 and polyamine@3 samples are interpreted as consistent with a Grotthuss proton-transport mechanism.
Caveat: Mechanism assignment is based on Arrhenius activation energies, not direct proton-motion observation.
main p.4 · Results and discussion · Fig. 4 · Linked to 4 structured results
The high conductivity of TETA@3 arises from synergy between polyamine hopping sites, HPW proton donors, and MIL-101 confinement.
Caveat: Mechanistic interpretation is author-proposed; direct microscopic dynamics data are not in the main article.
main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 · Linked to 4 structured results
Names and aliases are kept exactly within the paper’s own identity model.
| Material | Composition | Structure context | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| HPW-loaded MIL-101(Cr) | H3PW12O40 in MIL-101(Cr) poresMIL-101 chromium(III) clusters with Keggin-type HPW guests · Terephthalate | 3D · CompositeGuest-loaded MIL-101 with HPW selectively positioned in larger cages, smaller cages, or both cage types to form zigzag, linear, or multiple proton-conducting pathways. | main p.3 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| HPW/TETA blend (PT) | H3PW12O40/triethylenetetramine precipitated blendNone; non-MOF HPW/TETA comparison · Triethylenetetramine | 0D · CompositeNon-framework acid-base blend used to show that the MIL-101 pore environment is required for high conductivity. | main p.2 · Experimental |
| MIL-101(Cr) | MIL-101 chromium terephthalate frameworkTrimeric chromium(III) clusters · Terephthalic acid / benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate | 3D · PristineMIL-101 framework with smaller Cage A and larger Cage B forming linear Pore A and zigzag Pore B tunnel profiles. | main p.1 · Introduction · Fig. 1 |
| Polyamine-modified HPW-loaded MIL-101(Cr) | polyamine@HPW@MIL-101(Cr)MIL-101 chromium(III) clusters, HPW guests, and coordinated/protonated polyamines · Terephthalate plus ethylenediamine, diethylenetriamine, triethylenetetramine, or tetraethylenepentamine guests | 3D · CompositePost-modified HPW@MIL-101 sample 3 with flexible polyamines added as proton-hopping sites. | main p.4 · Results and discussion · Fig. 3 |
| TETA@MIL-101 | TETA-modified MIL-101(Cr)MIL-101 chromium(III) clusters with TETA at activated chromium sites · Terephthalate plus triethylenetetramine | 3D · CompositeTETA-modified MIL-101 without HPW proton donor, used as a comparison sample. | main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 |
Sample form, processing state and composition status define the context for measurements.
| Sample | Form and role | Processing and geometry | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| DETA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Sample 3 post-modified with diethylenetriamine in anhydrous toluene under reflux. | main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 |
| EN@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Sample 3 post-modified with ethylenediamine in anhydrous toluene under reflux. | main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 |
| MIL-101research_0522__mat__mil101_cr | Powder · Pristine Control · Pristine Framework | Hydrothermally prepared powder; dried at room temperature and degassed under vacuum at 150 C for 12 h before further treatment. | main p.1 · Introduction |
| PTresearch_0522__mat__hpw_teta_blend | Powder · Model System · Composite | White HPW/TETA precipitate formed from aqueous HPW solution by TETA addition. | main p.2 · Experimental |
| 1research_0522__mat__hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Dry MIL-101 impregnated with aqueous HPW; HPW selectively loaded into Cage B to form zigzag pathways. | main p.3 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| 2research_0522__mat__hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Prepared by lixiviating/leaching HPW from Cage B of sample 3 until almost no HPW was detected in filtrate; HPW remains in Cage A. | main p.3 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| 2 primeresearch_0522__mat__hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Lower-loading linear-pathway analogue prepared from 3 prime by the same water leaching procedure. | main p.4 · Results and discussion · Fig. S9 |
| 3research_0522__mat__hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | One-pot HPW incorporation during MIL-101 host formation; HPW loaded into both cage types. | main p.3 · Results and discussion · Table 1 |
| 3 primeresearch_0522__mat__hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Lower-HPW one-pot analogue used to prepare 2 prime. | main p.2 · Experimental |
| TEPA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Sample 3 post-modified with tetraethylenepentamine in anhydrous toluene under reflux. | main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 |
| TETA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Sample 3 post-modified with triethylenetetramine in anhydrous toluene under reflux. | main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 |
| 1.2TETA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Sample 3 post-modified with 1.2 mmol TETA per 1.0 g sample under the TETA@3 conditions. | main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 |
| 1.7TETA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | TETA-loading-series sample prepared with 1.7 mmol g^-1 TETA addition. | main p.6 · Results and discussion · Fig. S17 |
| 2.7TETA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | TETA-loading-series sample prepared with 2.7 mmol g^-1 TETA addition. | main p.6 · Results and discussion · Fig. S17 |
| 3.2TETA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | TETA-loading-series sample prepared with 3.2 mmol g^-1 TETA addition. | main p.6 · Results and discussion · Fig. S17 |
| 4.2TETA@3research_0522__mat__polyamine_hpw_mil101 | Powder · Target Sample · Guest Loaded | Sample 3 post-modified with 4.2 mmol TETA per 1.0 g sample under the TETA@3 conditions. | main p.6 · Results and discussion · Fig. S17 |
| TETA@MIL-101research_0522__mat__teta_mil101 | Powder · Pristine Control · Guest Loaded | Activated MIL-101 modified with TETA using the TETA@3 method but without HPW. | main p.5 · Results and discussion · Table 2 |