Other — Bimetallic synergy significantly enhances the photocatalytic performance of lanthanide porphyrin-based MOFs: Efficient photocatalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol and benzylamine under mild conditions in air

6 measurement groups · 80 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Photocatalytic cycling stability with post-cycle XRD/FESEM/XPS

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy X-ray diffraction and scattering Scanning electron microscopy

Ni-Nd PMOFs · Powder

Five photocatalytic cycles for benzyl alcohol and benzylamine; post-cycle XRD, FESEM, and XPS in SI.

Temperature: room temperature
Atmosphere: air
Context: target mixed-metal PMOF
Measurement source: 10-11 · Figures S5-S7 · Fig. S5-S7

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Benzyl alcohol catalytic efficiency after 5 cycles	91% after 5 cycling cycles	—	—	Text Exact Reported	7 · 3.2.1 Photocatalytic oxidation of benzyl alcohol · Fig. S5a
Benzylamine catalytic efficiency after 5 cycles	91% after 5 photocatalytic cycles	—	—	Text Exact Reported	7 · 3.2.2 Photocatalytic oxidative coupling of benzylamine · Fig. S5b
Post-cycle crystal structure retention	original crystal structure retained after 5 cycles	—	—	Text Qualitative	7 · 3.2 Photocatalytic experiment · Fig. S6-S7

Photocatalytic aerobic oxidation of benzyl alcohol to benzaldehyde

All reported TCPP/PMOF samples · Unknown

5 mg catalyst, 2 mL solvent, 0.5 mmol benzyl alcohol in table conditions; air, 12 W white light, room temperature; GC-FID analysis.

Temperature: room temperature
Atmosphere: air unless control under N2
Geometry: closed reactor
Context: Ni-Nd PMOF target with Co-Nd and Nd PMOF controls
Measurement source: 6 · Table 1 · Table 1

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Benzyl alcohol blank conversion without catalyst	trace	—	—	Table Qualitative	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 1 benzyl alcohol conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, conversion 76%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 1 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, selectivity 85%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 2 benzyl alcohol conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, DMF, 6 h, conversion 35%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 2 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, DMF, 6 h, selectivity 60%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 3 benzyl alcohol conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, PhCH3, 6 h, conversion 30%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 3 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, PhCH3, 6 h, selectivity 46%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 4 benzyl alcohol conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3OH, 6 h, conversion 72%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 4 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3OH, 6 h, selectivity 81%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 5 benzyl alcohol conversionMarked as a best value within this paper	Ni-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 6 h, conversion 90%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 5 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 6 h, selectivity 94%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 6 benzyl alcohol conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 2 h, conversion 54%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 6 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 2 h, selectivity 70%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 7 benzyl alcohol conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 4 h, conversion 78%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 7 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 4 h, selectivity 82%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 8 benzyl alcohol conversion	Co-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 6 h, conversion 62%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 8 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Co-Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 6 h, selectivity 79%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 9 benzyl alcohol conversion	Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 6 h, conversion 43%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Table 1 entry 9 benzyl alcohol selectivity	Nd PMOFs, EtOH, 6 h, selectivity 58%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Benzyl alcohol conversion under N2	trace	—	—	Table Qualitative	6 · Table 1 · Table 1
Benzyl alcohol conversion without light	trace	—	—	Table Qualitative	6 · Table 1 · Table 1

Photocatalytic oxidative coupling of benzylamine

All reported TCPP/PMOF samples · Unknown

5 mg catalyst, 2 mL solvent, 0.5 mmol substrate in table footnote, air, 12 W white light, room temperature; GC-FID analysis.

Temperature: room temperature
Atmosphere: air unless control under N2
Geometry: closed reactor
Context: Ni-Nd PMOF target with Co-Nd and Nd PMOF controls
Measurement source: 7 · Table 2 · Table 2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Benzylamine blank conversion without catalyst	trace	—	—	Table Qualitative	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 1 benzylamine conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3OH, 6 h, conversion 33%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 1 benzylamine selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3OH, 6 h, selectivity 51%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 2 benzylamine conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, DMF, 6 h, conversion 27%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 2 benzylamine selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, DMF, 6 h, selectivity 45%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 3 benzylamine conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, H2O, 6 h, conversion 41%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 3 benzylamine selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, H2O, 6 h, selectivity 63%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 4 benzylamine conversionMarked as a best value within this paper	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, conversion 85%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 4 benzylamine selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, selectivity 83%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 5 benzylamine conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 2 h, conversion 44%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 5 benzylamine selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 2 h, selectivity 71%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 6 benzylamine conversion	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 4 h, conversion 70%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 6 benzylamine selectivity	Ni-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 4 h, selectivity 77%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 7 benzylamine conversion	Co-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, conversion 52%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 7 benzylamine selectivity	Co-Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, selectivity 68%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 8 benzylamine conversion	Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, conversion 38%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Table 2 entry 8 benzylamine selectivity	Nd PMOFs, CH3CN, 6 h, selectivity 61%	—	—	Table Exact Reported	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Benzylamine conversion under N2	trace	—	—	Table Qualitative	7 · Table 2 · Table 2
Benzylamine conversion without light	trace	—	—	Table Qualitative	7 · Table 2 · Table 2

Substituted benzyl alcohol photocatalytic oxidation substrate scope

Ni-Nd PMOFs · Powder

Ni-Nd PMOFs, 12 W white light, air, room temperature; values read from rendered SI Table S2.

Temperature: room temperature
Atmosphere: air
Context: target mixed-metal PMOF
Measurement source: 5 · Table S2 · Table S2

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Table S2 entry 1 benzyl alcohol conversion	unsubstituted benzyl alcohol conversion 90%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 1 benzyl alcohol selectivity	unsubstituted benzyl alcohol selectivity 94%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 2 p-methylbenzyl alcohol conversion	p-methylbenzyl alcohol conversion 91%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 2 p-methylbenzyl alcohol selectivityMarked as a best value within this paper	p-methylbenzyl alcohol selectivity 96%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 3 p-methoxybenzyl alcohol conversionMarked as a best value within this paper	p-methoxybenzyl alcohol conversion 93%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 3 p-methoxybenzyl alcohol selectivityMarked as a best value within this paper	p-methoxybenzyl alcohol selectivity 96%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 4 p-chlorobenzyl alcohol conversion	p-chlorobenzyl alcohol conversion 82%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 4 p-chlorobenzyl alcohol selectivity	p-chlorobenzyl alcohol selectivity 91%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 5 p-bromobenzyl alcohol conversion	p-bromobenzyl alcohol conversion 77%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 5 p-bromobenzyl alcohol selectivity	p-bromobenzyl alcohol selectivity 90%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 6 m-methylbenzyl alcohol conversion	m-methylbenzyl alcohol conversion 84%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 6 m-methylbenzyl alcohol selectivity	m-methylbenzyl alcohol selectivity 89%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 7 o-methylbenzyl alcohol conversion	o-methylbenzyl alcohol conversion 78%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 7 o-methylbenzyl alcohol selectivity	o-methylbenzyl alcohol selectivity 85%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 8 m-chlorobenzyl alcohol conversion	m-chlorobenzyl alcohol conversion 75%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 8 m-chlorobenzyl alcohol selectivity	m-chlorobenzyl alcohol selectivity 84%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 9 o-chlorobenzyl alcohol conversion	o-chlorobenzyl alcohol conversion 70%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2
Table S2 entry 9 o-chlorobenzyl alcohol selectivity	o-chlorobenzyl alcohol selectivity 82%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	5 · Table S2 · Table S2

Substituted benzylamine photocatalytic oxidative coupling substrate scope

Ni-Nd PMOFs · Powder

Ni-Nd PMOFs, 12 W white light, air, room temperature; values read from rendered SI Table S3.

Temperature: room temperature
Atmosphere: air
Context: target mixed-metal PMOF
Measurement source: 6 · Table S3 · Table S3

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Table S3 entry 1 benzylamine conversion	unsubstituted benzylamine conversion 85%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 1 benzylamine selectivity	unsubstituted benzylamine selectivity 83%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 2 p-methylbenzylamine conversion	p-methylbenzylamine conversion 87%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 2 p-methylbenzylamine selectivity	p-methylbenzylamine selectivity 84%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 3 p-methoxybenzylamine conversionMarked as a best value within this paper	p-methoxybenzylamine conversion 89%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 3 p-methoxybenzylamine selectivityMarked as a best value within this paper	p-methoxybenzylamine selectivity 87%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 4 p-chlorobenzylamine conversion	p-chlorobenzylamine conversion 80%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 4 p-chlorobenzylamine selectivity	p-chlorobenzylamine selectivity 82%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 5 p-fluorobenzylamine conversion	p-fluorobenzylamine conversion 71%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 5 p-fluorobenzylamine selectivity	p-fluorobenzylamine selectivity 75%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 6 m-methylbenzylamine conversion	m-methylbenzylamine conversion 78%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 6 m-methylbenzylamine selectivity	m-methylbenzylamine selectivity 80%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 7 o-methylbenzylamine conversion	o-methylbenzylamine conversion 72%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 7 o-methylbenzylamine selectivity	o-methylbenzylamine selectivity 75%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 8 m-chlorobenzylamine conversion	m-chlorobenzylamine conversion 75%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 8 m-chlorobenzylamine selectivity	m-chlorobenzylamine selectivity 78%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 9 o-chlorobenzylamine conversion	o-chlorobenzylamine conversion 70%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3
Table S3 entry 9 o-chlorobenzylamine selectivity	o-chlorobenzylamine selectivity 73%	—	—	Visual Estimate Rounded Reported	6 · Table S3 · Table S3

Thermogravimetric analysis

All reported TCPP/PMOF samples · Unknown

Air atmosphere, heating rate 10 C/min, TGA-8000 instrument.

Atmosphere: air
Context: PMOF series
Measurement source: 2 · Characterization procedures

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Crystal structure collapse onset	crystal structure started to collapse at 300 C	—	—	Text Rounded Reported	6 · 3.1 Material characterization · Fig. S2