Computational Modelling — Strategies to enhance electrochemical performance of isoreticular 2d conjugated metal correlated organic frameworks via transition metals intercalation for battery-supercapacitor hybrids

2 measurement groups · 10 results

Reported values remain attached to the sample, method, conditions, extraction quality and source location that produced them.

Cu-MOF//AC hybrid supercapacitor · Electrode

Regression parameters k1 and k2 and separated capacitive/diffusive currents at scan rates including 3, 60 and 100 mV/s.

Geometry: Two-electrode asymmetric hybrid device
Context: MOF//AC composite device
Measurement source: 8 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 9

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Cu-MOF//AC capacitive contribution at 100 mV/s	approximately 72%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 9d	Figure Axis Approximate	8 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 9d
Cu-MOF//AC capacitive contribution at 3 mV/s	approximately 26%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 9d	Figure Axis Approximate	8 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 9d
Cu-MOF//AC diffusive contribution at 100 mV/s	approximately 53%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 9d	Figure Axis Approximate	8 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 9d
Cu-MOF//AC diffusive contribution at 3 mV/s	approximately 99%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 9d	Figure Axis Approximate	8 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 9d
Dunn k1/k2 stability interpretation	Cu-MOF//AC shows slower switching in k1/k2 and is interpreted as more stable.	—	—	Text Qualitative	7 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 7

Ni-MOF//AC hybrid supercapacitor · Electrode

Regression parameters k1 and k2 and separated capacitive/diffusive currents at scan rates including 3, 60 and 100 mV/s.

Geometry: Two-electrode asymmetric hybrid device
Context: MOF//AC composite device
Measurement source: 7 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 7 and Fig. 8

Property	Reported value	Normalised value	Uncertainty	Origin and quality	Source
Ni-MOF//AC capacitive contribution at 100 mV/s	approximately 47%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 8d	Figure Axis Approximate	7 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 8d
Ni-MOF//AC capacitive contribution at 3 mV/s	approximately 12%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 8d	Figure Axis Approximate	7 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 8d
Ni-MOF//AC diffusive contribution at 100 mV/s	approximately 64%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 8d	Figure Axis Approximate	7 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 8d
Ni-MOF//AC diffusive contribution at 3 mV/s	approximately 98%	—	visual estimate from rendered Fig. 8d	Figure Axis Approximate	7 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 8d
Dunn k1/k2 relative magnitude	Higher magnitude of both k1 and k2 for Ni-MOF//AC indicates high currents.	—	—	Text Qualitative	7 · 3.3. Evaluation of Ni-MOF and Cu-MOF based battery-supercapacitor hybrids · Fig. 7